--- title: "China’s new quantum computer hits stability milestone, beating Google on efficiency" type: "News" locale: "en" url: "https://longbridge.com/en/news/270808550.md" description: "Chinese researchers, led by Pan Jianwei, have achieved a milestone in quantum computing with their superconducting quantum computer, Zuchongzhi 3.2, reaching the fault-tolerant threshold. This makes them the first team outside the US to achieve this, following Google. Their method, using microwave-based control, offers a potentially more efficient path to building large, fault-tolerant quantum computers. This advancement addresses the challenge of qubits drifting and spreading errors, marking a significant step in the global quantum computing race." datetime: "2025-12-26T01:05:51.000Z" locales: - [zh-CN](https://longbridge.com/zh-CN/news/270808550.md) - [en](https://longbridge.com/en/news/270808550.md) - [zh-HK](https://longbridge.com/zh-HK/news/270808550.md) --- # China’s new quantum computer hits stability milestone, beating Google on efficiency Chinese researchers have taken a major step in the global race to build practical quantum computers, becoming the first team outside the United States – and the second in the world after Google – to cross a key threshold that determines whether these machines can work reliably at scale.\\nA team led by Pan Jianwei at the University of Science and Technology of China said their superconducting quantum computer, Zuchongzhi 3.2, had reached the fault-tolerant threshold – a point where fixing errors made the system more stable rather than less, overcoming a long-standing problem in which the very process of error correction introduces new mistakes.\\nTheir research, published last week in the journal Physical Review Letters, relied on microwave-based control rather than the hardware-intensive error-suppression methods used by Google. The Chinese approach “could offer a more efficient route than Google’s” to building large, fault-tolerant quantum computers, the team said in a statement on Monday.\\nJoseph Emerson, a physicist at the University of Waterloo in Canada who was not involved in the research, said the study tackled one of quantum computing’s most difficult problems: qubits drifting out of their intended states and quietly spreading errors through the system.\\nWriting in the American Physical Society’s Physics magazine, Emerson described the experiment as “an impressive feat”, while cautioning that it remained far from the scale needed for practical, real-world applications.\\n\\n\\nQuantum computers work by harnessing the laws of quantum physics rather than the simple on-off logic used by ordinary computers. In theory, this allows them to tackle certain tasks – such as optimising complex systems or simulating molecules – in minutes that would take today’s machines thousands of years to complete.\\nIn practice, however, quantum computers face a fundamental obstacle: instability. Their building blocks, known as qubits, are extremely sensitive to heat, noise and tiny disturbances from their surroundings, causing errors to appear constantly during normal operation.\\nTo manage this, scientists developed quantum error correction, which spreads information across many qubits and repeatedly checks for problems. But this creates a paradox: each extra qubit and each additional check also introduces new sources of error.\\nFor years, attempts to correct mistakes made systems less reliable, not more.\\nThat is why researchers focused on a critical tipping point known as the error-correction threshold. Below this threshold, error correction backfires and creates more mistakes than it removes. Above it, the balance flips and error correction delivers a net benefit, allowing systems to become more stable as they grow.\\nChina and the US both began investing early in surface code quantum error correction, one of the most widely studied methods for protecting quantum information. In 2022, Pan’s team used an earlier processor, Zuchongzhi 2, to achieve a minimal error-correcting unit, known as a distance-3 surface code logical qubit, as an initial proof of principle.\\nThe following year, Google pushed the technique further by achieving distance-5 surface code error correction. But in both cases, relatively high error rates in the underlying qubits prevented the systems from truly crossing the threshold.\\nThat changed in February, when Google reported a breakthrough using its Willow quantum processor. By suppressing a particularly harmful class of errors known as leakage using direct current pulses, Google became the world’s first team to achieve a distance-7 surface code logical qubit operating below the threshold.\\nThis approach, however, places tight constraints on chip design and requires increasingly complex wiring in ultra-low-temperature environments as systems scale up, according to Pan’s team.\\nIn the new study, the Chinese researchers took a different path. Working with the 107-qubit Zuchongzhi 3.2 processor, they developed an all-microwave method to suppress leakage errors, using carefully timed microwave signals instead of additional hardware controls.\\nCombining this approach with surface code error correction, Pan and coworkers were able to build a distance-7 logical qubit, matching the scale of Google’s most advanced demonstrations. They found that as the system grew larger, the overall error rate fell rather than rose.\\nThe researchers measured an error-suppression factor of 1.4, meaning each increase in the size of the error-correction code reduced errors instead of amplifying them, which was clear evidence that the system was operating below the threshold.\\nThey said that the all-microwave approach could offer practical advantages as quantum computers grow larger. Because microwave signals can be multiplexed, allowing multiple signals to travel along a single wire, the method might reduce wiring complexity and hardware overhead, two major obstacles to scaling quantum processors.\\nTaken together, they said, the results pointed to a more flexible and potentially more scalable route towards fault-tolerant quantum computers with hundreds of thousands or even millions of qubits.\\n ## Related News & Research - [Broadcom Says AI Demand Is 'Insatiable'](https://longbridge.com/en/news/288720075.md) - [Why Tempus AI Stock Is Surging On Thursday?](https://longbridge.com/en/news/288752450.md) - [Wall Street banks and CEOs promote SpaceX in flashy events with BofA, Morgan Stanley, JPM events planned](https://longbridge.com/en/news/288753814.md) - [IONQ vs. RGTI: Analysts See Big Upside for One Quantum Computing Stock, Downside for the Other. Here's Why](https://longbridge.com/en/news/288694066.md) - [Why Is Redwire Stock Soaring Thursday?](https://longbridge.com/en/news/288750924.md)