---
title: "New investors become \"straw buyers,\" continuously earning \"management fees\" – the \"Ponzi scheme\" of American private equity giants"
description: "American private equity giants are conducting \"internal takeover\" transactions on a record scale, selling assets from old funds to new funds through \"continuation funds,\" with transaction volumes expe"
type: "news"
locale: "en"
url: "https://longbridge.com/en/news/271407194.md"
published_at: "2026-01-04T04:12:54.000Z"
---

# New investors become "straw buyers," continuously earning "management fees" – the "Ponzi scheme" of American private equity giants

> American private equity giants are conducting "internal takeover" transactions on a record scale, selling assets from old funds to new funds through "continuation funds," with transaction volumes expected to exceed $100 billion by 2025. Although this operation can create an illusion of "liquidity" and indefinitely reset management fees, it raises serious concerns about conflicts of interest and valuation manipulation, as institutions simultaneously act as both buyers and sellers, and is seen as a "circular game" that maintains industry bubbles

According to ZeroHedge, in the most blatant act of self-interest since the last crisis, American private equity giants are selling assets to themselves at a record pace.

To support their crumbling empires, these firms are adopting a strategy criticized by outsiders as desperate and reminiscent of a Ponzi scheme: not only making new investors "the bag holders," but also locking in management fee income indefinitely.

Data from Raymond James indicates that by 2025, transactions involving private equity firms raising funds from new investors to purchase their own old fund portfolios are expected to reach an astonishing $107 billion, far exceeding last year's $70 billion. These tools, known as "continuation vehicles," allow private equity giants to return funds to limited partners of old funds in desperate need of cash while maintaining control over the assets. More critically, this resets the timer on management fees and carried interest.

This operational model has sparked strong concerns in the market about conflicts of interest. Private equity firms act as both buyers and sellers in these transactions, effectively controlling the pricing power of assets as they shift from one "pocket" to another. Limited partners, such as pension funds, worry that managers may intentionally undervalue assets to harm the interests of exiting investors, paving the way for high returns for new funds.

Despite institutions like Jefferies predicting that global related transaction volumes will approach $100 billion, and the industry internally beautifying it as a "win-win liquidity solution," a Bain & Company survey shows that nearly two-thirds of limited partners still prefer traditional exit methods—namely, selling to external parties or IPOs. As this "recycling of funds game" becomes the new normal, the market questions whether this is merely a means to prolong the private equity bubble until the music finally stops.

## Surge in Continuation Funds: The "Hot Potato" of Internal Digestion

Against the backdrop of genuine market exit channels remaining frozen, private equity firms are using "continuation funds" as their preferred tool. According to the Financial Times, about one-fifth of private equity exit cases this year involved such operations, a significant increase from the 12-13% in previous years. Sunaina Sinha Haldea of Raymond James predicts that transaction volumes will exceed $100 billion by 2025.

The core of this mechanism is that when private equity giants cannot find external buyers, they establish new funds and pass the "hot potato" internally. Sunaina Sinha Haldea describes it as a "popular and effective multi-win liquidity solution" in the current environment. However, **critics point out that this is essentially the ultimate "want it both ways" scheme: cashing out old funds, locking in new funds, and indefinitely extracting management fees from the same assets.**

## Giants Entering the Scene: From Last Resort to Preferred Tool

The Financial Times notes that the list of participants in such operations reads like a "who's who" of the private equity industry. PAI Partners transferred part of its stake in the ice cream giant Froneri (a Häagen-Dazs affiliate) back into a continuation fund, with a transaction valuation of €15 billion In addition, companies such as Vista Equity, New Mountain Capital, and Inflexion have deployed billions of dollars in follow-on funds to retain their core assets, rather than pushing them to the public market or seeking genuine third-party buyers.

Even EQT CEO Per Franzén, who has not yet ventured into this field, recently acknowledged the intention to join, **with motives that are obvious—generating additional fees on existing holdings. What was once seen as a "last resort" for dealing with neglected assets has now transformed into a preferred tool for hoarding quality assets.**

## Conflicts of Interest and Legal Risks: The Pricing Power of Mutual Struggle

This self-dealing model hides significant conflicts of interest. Since private equity firms sit on both sides of the transaction table, they determine the price of asset transfers. This has led to lawsuits from institutional investors such as the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority.

The Abu Dhabi Investment Authority has sued the U.S. company Energy & Minerals Group (EMG), accusing it of attempting to undervalue the natural gas driller Ascent Resources in a self-sale.

The lawsuit claims that EMG attempted to increase its ownership by underpricing and restarting fee collection. The deal ultimately fell apart due to the lawsuit, and external bidders are now intervening. Such cases highlight the anger of limited partners: they are concerned that managers are using valuation manipulation to "harvest" exiting investors while paving the way for the returns of new funds

## Related News & Research

| Title | Description | URL |
|-------|-------------|-----|
| 游戏业务遇冷，网易 Q4 营收、盈利双双不及预期 \| 财报见闻 | 网易第四季度业绩不及预期：调整后每股收益 10.95 元，低于预估的 14.07 元；营收 275.5 亿元亦未达预期。游戏业务收入 219.7 亿元，增长显疲软。管理层强调 AI 已深度融入游戏开发全流程，成为 “基础能力”。公司维持股东 | [Link](https://longbridge.com/en/news/275582885.md) |
| 最热门的独立游戏是关于繁育患有多动症和阅读障碍的猫 | 独立游戏《Mewgenics》由 Edmund McMillen 开发，因其将自闭症纳入猫咪可能遗传的疾病中而引起了广泛关注。2024 年的公告在 Reddit 和 TikTok 等平台上获得了极为积极的反馈，粉丝们对自闭症的表现表示感谢。 | [Link](https://longbridge.com/en/news/275904781.md) |
| Varsav 游戏工作室获得 10 万兹罗提资金用于游戏本地化 | Varsav Game Studios SA：获得 118,795 波兰兹罗提的游戏本地化资金，用于将《Barkour》游戏本地化为八种语言 | [Link](https://longbridge.com/en/news/276046402.md) |
| Steam 测试版让用户可以在评论中添加他们的电脑配置 | Steam 在其客户端测试版中推出了一项新功能，允许用户在游戏评论中附加他们的 PC 硬件规格。此更新旨在增强评论的信息性，因为用户现在可以自动包含他们的规格，从而更容易识别与硬件相关的性能问题，而不是游戏本身。这一变化可能会为玩家和开发者 | [Link](https://longbridge.com/en/news/275935594.md) |
| 22:10 ET Dowinx 通过用户导向的设计推动人体工学游戏椅的创新 | Dowinx 正在通过以用户为驱动的设计方法创新人体工学游戏椅，专注于为游戏玩家和家庭办公室用户提供舒适性和耐用性。他们的椅子具有先进的人体工学结构、按摩支持、多方向扶手和优化的座椅缓冲。Dowinx 强调真实用户反馈以实现持续改进，并获得 | [Link](https://longbridge.com/en/news/275962238.md) |

---

> **Disclaimer**: This article is for reference only and does not constitute any investment advice.