---
title: "Vote for a rate cut! Waller \"wants to progress too much\""
description: "Federal Reserve Governor Waller teamed up with Trump confidant Milan to cast one of the two dissenting votes in support of a rate cut during the overnight interest rate decision. Waller has been accus"
type: "news"
locale: "en"
url: "https://longbridge.com/en/news/274063299.md"
published_at: "2026-01-29T00:23:55.000Z"
---

# Vote for a rate cut! Waller "wants to progress too much"

> Federal Reserve Governor Waller teamed up with Trump confidant Milan to cast one of the two dissenting votes in support of a rate cut during the overnight interest rate decision. Waller has been accused of showing loyalty to Trump in a bid for the next chair position. Although this move has increased Waller's chances of succeeding to 15%, experts criticize him for engaging in "political calculations" without data support, aiming to pass Trump's "loyalty test," which has severely damaged his personal reputation and the independence of the Federal Reserve

Overnight, Federal Reserve policymakers decided to maintain interest rates unchanged with a vote of 10 to 2. Governor Christopher Waller aligned with another "Trump loyalist," Governor Stephen Miran, both casting dissenting votes advocating for a 25 basis point rate cut.

According to Bloomberg columnist Jonathan Levin's latest analysis, Waller's move, as one of the final candidates for the next Federal Reserve Chair, may cater to President Trump's preference for low rates, but it forces this supposed "honorable public servant" to undergo a "loyalty test," potentially incurring a heavy reputational cost.

The market reacted swiftly to this dynamic. On the betting site Kalshi, the odds of Waller succeeding the Federal Reserve Chair surged from 8% on Tuesday to 15% on Wednesday. Trump has previously made it clear that he would prioritize a candidate who could deliver lower rates. Levin points out that Waller's dovish dissenting vote was aimed at pleasing the president, **but this not only undermines his image as a technocrat who bases policy on economic data but may also harm the Federal Reserve's institutional independence.**

Levin bluntly states, **Waller's decision is seen as a form of "political calculation" or "grandstanding," rather than being strictly rooted in economics.** Although Levin has long supported Waller, considering him the best candidate to defend institutional independence, he must admit that Waller's current image will certainly take a hit. Levin laments, "It's unfortunate that Trump has put him in this position."

## **Economic Justifications Are Insufficient**

From a purely economic perspective, Waller's dissent appears unconvincing. Levin notes, "It is currently unclear why further rate cuts are so urgent as to warrant dissent." Although Waller tends to use an index adjusted for tariffs, inflation remains slightly above target.

Meanwhile, strong GDP data and a stabilizing labor market have "eliminated the urgency for rate cuts."

Additionally, the committee's current policy stance is at a reasonable "neutral" level. The estimated neutral policy interest rate range is between 2.6% and 3.9%, while the current rate range, after three rate cuts, is 3.5% to 3.75%, which falls within this range.

Levin recalls Waller's stance in July, when he believed tariffs were a one-time price increase and inflation was close to target. However, with subsequent data releases, many of the assumptions at that time (such as weak GDP growth) have proven to be no longer valid.

## **Contradicting the Intent of Cautious Dissent**

Waller's actions seem to contradict the standards he himself set.

Levin quotes Waller's original words during a July Bloomberg TV interview: "Generally speaking, if you are going to dissent, you have to be very clear that you believe this is an important matter at this moment." Waller also warned against becoming a "serial dissenter," stating, "If you are dissenting at every meeting like a 'crusader' regardless of what happens, then you might as well not attend." "Everyone knows what you will do."

However, the reality is that Waller is approaching the image he warned about. Levin wrote, "Waller is not yet a 'serial dissenter,' but in the last two meetings where he (and Trump) did not get their way, he has been two for two."

**Unlike Milan, who has long been seen as a 'hardcore dove' and has voted against every time, this is Waller's first dissenting vote, and this shift deepens the outside world's doubts about his motives.** Levin believes that while the intense debate within the Federal Reserve has its value, the premise is that dissent must be "strictly rooted in economics," otherwise it appears more like "political calculation."

Levin believes that while the intense debate within the Federal Reserve has its value, the premise is that dissent must be "strictly rooted in economics," otherwise it appears more like "political calculation."

## **The Cost of Institutional Independence**

Despite his critical stance on this vote, Levin still insists that Waller is the best candidate for the position of Federal Reserve Chair. He praised Waller as "an outstanding communicator" and noted that since joining the Federal Reserve in 2020, he has had "an excellent track record in judging the economy." Waller identified the risk of persistent inflation in 2021 and suggested in 2022 that the Federal Reserve could combat inflation with high interest rates without triggering a recession.

But Levin emphasized that this particular action "does not seem like one of Waller's more glorious moves." This indicates that even if the Federal Reserve's independence is ultimately maintained, the institution will "not emerge unscathed."

Levin concluded, "Trump's ugly pressure campaign and unorthodox hiring practices—forcing Federal Reserve Chair candidates to essentially bow before him—will not be easily forgotten, even if this circus ultimately places the right candidate in the top position of the central bank."

### Related Stocks

- [XLF.US - Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/XLF.US.md)

## Related News & Research

| Title | Description | URL |
|-------|-------------|-----|
| 美国众议院投票否决特朗普对加拿大加征关税 | 美国众议院以 219 票对 211 票通过一项决议，该决议将终止特朗普实施的对加拿大关税措施。 | [Link](https://longbridge.com/en/news/275673092.md) |
| 摩根大通正洽谈担任特朗普旗下和平委员会合作银行 | 摩根大通正在洽谈为特朗普政府主导的加沙和平委员会提供银行服务，该委员会旨在重建加沙，并被视为联合国的替代机制。尽管摩根大通与特朗普政府的关系复杂，因特朗普起诉该银行及其 CEO，但摩根大通仍在推动与和平委员会的合作。美国政府对此事未作评论， | [Link](https://longbridge.com/en/news/276304171.md) |
| 特朗普提名的美联储主席人选主张降息：主要理由是 AI | 特朗普提名的美联储主席候选人凯文・沃什主张降息，理由是人工智能可能带来生产力提升。他认为，AI 的影响类似于互联网，可能导致结构性通缩。尽管美国生产率增长强劲，经济学家对降息的直接关联仍存疑。沃什需说服美联储委员会成员，尤其是对通胀仍有顾虑 | [Link](https://longbridge.com/en/news/276054582.md) |
| 美国副总统万斯：特朗普在伊朗问题上有很多选项 | 美国副总统 JD·万斯在福克斯新闻采访中表示，与伊朗的谈判中一切都在考虑之列。他提到，尽管日内瓦的谈判进展顺利，但伊朗仍未承认特朗普划定的红线。万斯强调，特朗普在伊朗问题上有多种选择，并透露他刚与库什纳和威特科夫讨论过此事。 | [Link](https://longbridge.com/en/news/276169867.md) |
| 白宫新闻秘书莱维特：伊朗若与特朗普达成协议将是明智之举 | 白宫新闻秘书卡罗琳·莱维特表示，伊朗若与总统特朗普达成协议，将是明智之举。 莱维特在白宫向记者通报情况。 莱维特表示，有 “许多理由” 和论据支持对伊朗发动打击，但她补充称，外交仍是特朗普总统的首选。 | [Link](https://longbridge.com/en/news/276264324.md) |

---

> **Disclaimer**: This article is for reference only and does not constitute any investment advice.