--- title: "\"Roughly Neutral\" or \"Slightly Tight\"? Citigroup Interprets Powell's Speech: The Threshold for Rate Cuts is Already Low, Expected to Cut Rates Three Times This Year" description: "Powell stated that the monetary policy stance \"may be roughly neutral or slightly tight,\" a statement interpreted by Citigroup as indicating that while policy remains unchanged in the short term, ther" type: "news" locale: "en" url: "https://longbridge.com/en/news/274130216.md" published_at: "2026-01-29T10:06:14.000Z" --- # "Roughly Neutral" or "Slightly Tight"? Citigroup Interprets Powell's Speech: The Threshold for Rate Cuts is Already Low, Expected to Cut Rates Three Times This Year > Powell stated that the monetary policy stance "may be roughly neutral or slightly tight," a statement interpreted by Citigroup as indicating that while policy remains unchanged in the short term, there is still a tendency towards easing. Citigroup believes that the threshold for rate cuts is actually very low, and either a rise in the unemployment rate or a sustainable slowdown in inflation could trigger a rate cut, predicting that the Federal Reserve will cut rates by 25 basis points in March, July, and September of this year At the January FOMC meeting, Jerome Powell made every effort to maintain a stance of "not providing new guidance," trying to convince the market that the Federal Reserve is currently in a wait-and-see mode. However, for astute investors, the signals released at this meeting are far more dovish than they appear on the surface. **Although the Federal Reserve kept interest rates unchanged, Powell acknowledged that the current policy rate is in a "slightly restrictive" range and expressed caution regarding the so-called signs of stabilization in the labor market.** This actually exposes the Federal Reserve's internal concerns about an economic slowdown. According to Chase Trading Desk, on January 28, Citibank pointed out in its latest research report: **Although the Federal Reserve is currently holding steady, the threshold for rate cuts is actually very low.** Whether it is the rising unemployment rate or signs of continued easing inflation, either could quickly trigger the rate cut trigger. Based on this, Citibank maintains its aggressive forecast, believing that the Federal Reserve will cumulatively cut rates by 75 basis points by 2026. For investors, this means that the liquidity inflection point is not far away, and the current "pause" is merely a prelude to the next round of easing. **Key trading points may be in March, July, and September—these are the rate cut windows predicted by Citibank.** Do not be deceived by Powell's apparent calm; the real game lies in his characterization of "restrictive" rates, which leaves ample runway for subsequent policy shifts. ## Ambiguous "Neutral" vs. Clear "Restrictive" The most intriguing detail of this meeting is Powell's description of the current interest rate level. He continues to describe the policy rate as being at the top of the neutral range, stating that the policy rate "may be roughly neutral or slightly tight." This subtle semantic difference is crucial. If it is "accommodative neutral," it means the Federal Reserve can maintain the status quo for a long time; but if it is "slightly restrictive," it means that if inflation continues to decline, real interest rates will effectively rise, thereby excessively suppressing the economy. Powell reiterated that most officials expect further rate cuts this year, and currently, no officials have included the option of rate hikes in their baseline assumptions. This statement effectively eliminates the risk of rate hikes and establishes a one-way downward trend for rates, with the only uncertainty being the timing. ## Labor Market: Surface Stabilization vs. Underlying Weakness The Federal Reserve made slight adjustments in its policy statement regarding the labor market, changing the previous wording of "gradually rising unemployment rate" to "showing some signs of stabilization," and removing the phrase "the risks to employment have increased in recent months." On the surface, this seems to endorse a hawkish stance. However, Citibank points out that investors should not overinterpret this change. Powell explicitly downplayed this modification during the press conference, warning that he "would not overinterpret this." Although he acknowledged that this could be early signs of stabilization, he also cited evidence that the labor market remains weak. He specifically referenced consumer survey data from the Conference Board, noting that the number of people who believe jobs are "plentiful" is declining, while the number of those who find jobs "hard to get" is increasing This indicates that the Federal Reserve Chairman himself does not believe that the labor market has escaped danger, and this "picky" attitude towards data suggests his tendency to look for reasons to cut interest rates. ## Inflation Path: Tariff Disturbances Do Not Change Downward Trend Regarding inflation, Powell maintained a constructive attitude, believing that inflation will continue to return to the 2% target. The current core inflation is slightly above the target mainly due to the impact of rising prices of goods related to tariffs. Powell clearly stated, **this tariff-driven strength in commodity prices is expected to fade by mid-year.** Meanwhile, prices in the service sector are slowing down. This means that the Federal Reserve views the current inflation rebound as a temporary supply-side shock rather than overheating demand. **As long as service sector inflation continues to decline, the Federal Reserve is confident in achieving its inflation target later this year. This qualitative assessment of the causes of inflation further clears the obstacles to interest rate cuts.** ## Internal Discrepancies Emerge: Waller Casts Dissenting Vote This meeting was not unanimous, and the voting results revealed divisions within the Federal Reserve. While most supported keeping interest rates unchanged, Miran and Waller voted against, leaning towards a 25 basis point cut at this meeting. Especially Waller's dissent, although anticipated by the market, merely confirmed his known dovish stance. In contrast, Goolsbee and Schmid preferred to maintain the status quo. This internal division indicates that even during a period of inaction, the forces supporting easing remain strong and have not been completely convinced by the so-called "robust" economic data ### Related Stocks - [XLF.US - Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/XLF.US.md) - [.IXIC.US - NASDAQ Composite Index](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/.IXIC.US.md) - [IAI.US - ISHRS Us Brokers & Sec Exchg](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/IAI.US.md) - [NDAQ.US - Nasdaq](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/NDAQ.US.md) - [FNCL.US - Fidelity MSCI Financials Index](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/FNCL.US.md) - [VFH.US - VG Financial](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/VFH.US.md) - [.SPX.US - S&P 500](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/.SPX.US.md) - [CBOE.US - Cboe Global Markets](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/CBOE.US.md) - [.DJI.US - Dow Jones Industrial Average](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/.DJI.US.md) ## Related News & Research | Title | Description | URL | |-------|-------------|-----| | 公开和沃什 “唱反调”？多位美联储高官称：AI 提升生产力或意味着 “更高的中性利率” | 美联储年内降息空间或进一步收窄，目前期货市场已将首次降息预期推迟至年中之后。 | [Link](https://longbridge.com/en/news/276190662.md) | | “硬件防御” 对冲 AI 焦虑，苹果与纳指相关性创 20 年新低 | AI 浪潮下，苹果因未深度卷入军备竞赛，与纳指相关性创 20 年新低，成为科技股动荡中的 “避风港”。在 AI 投资回报存疑及软件业面临颠覆的焦虑中，苹果凭借不易受冲击的硬件生态逆势突围。尽管存在估值偏高及增长放缓压力，其独特的 “AI 中 | [Link](https://longbridge.com/en/news/276301841.md) | | 贝森特和沃什的 “导师”，德鲁肯米勒 Q4“精准” 开仓金融股 ETF、标普等权重 ETF 和巴西 ETF | 科技股方面，德鲁肯米勒 Q4 清仓了 Meta，加仓了谷歌与 Sea。德鲁肯米勒与贝森特、沃什的 “师徒” 关系让市场推测，“德鲁肯米勒经济学”——即反赤字、反通胀、反关税——可能通过贝森特和沃什渗透至政策制定中。 | [Link](https://longbridge.com/en/news/276214511.md) | | 瑞银集团 - 稳定化后公告 RBI PerpNC6.9 AT1 | 瑞士银行（UBS AG）已发布关于 Raiffeisen Bank International AG 发行的 6.9% 永久性无到期日 AT1 证券（总额为 6.5 亿欧元）的后稳定通知。通知指出，瑞士银行欧洲子公司（UBS Europe | [Link](https://longbridge.com/en/news/276321485.md) | | 高盛：美国移民骤降 80% 重塑就业 “盈亏平衡点”，AI 成劳动力市场最大变数 | 高盛指出，受特朗普政府移民限制政策影响，美国净移民人数骤降 80%，预计 2026 年将进一步降至 20 万人。劳动力供给的急剧收缩，已将从现在到年底维持失业率稳定所需的月均就业增长门槛，从 7 万人大幅压低至约 5 万人。招聘不再需要像以 | [Link](https://longbridge.com/en/news/276297381.md) | --- > **Disclaimer**: This article is for reference only and does not constitute any investment advice.