---
title: "Federal Reserve Governor Michelle Bowman: This year, we need to cut interest rates by more than 100 basis points, and I look forward to seeing how Waller performs next"
description: "In his speech, Milan clearly stated that potential inflation is not a problem, and there is not much strong price pressure seen in the economy. He pointed out that the rise in long-term yields is part"
type: "news"
locale: "en"
url: "https://longbridge.com/en/news/274661483.md"
published_at: "2026-02-03T13:10:12.000Z"
---

# Federal Reserve Governor Michelle Bowman: This year, we need to cut interest rates by more than 100 basis points, and I look forward to seeing how Waller performs next

> In his speech, Milan clearly stated that potential inflation is not a problem, and there is not much strong price pressure seen in the economy. He pointed out that the rise in long-term yields is partly due to improved growth expectations rather than heightened inflation concerns

Stephen Miran, a director appointed by Trump, stated on Tuesday that **the Federal Reserve needs to cut interest rates by more than 100 basis points this year and is looking forward to Kevin Warsh's performance as the Fed Chair.**

Miran clearly expressed during a speech on Fox Business Network that the current interest rate level is too restrictive, potential inflation is not a problem, and he does not see much strong price pressure in the economy. This judgment provides a basis for his advocacy of significant rate cuts.

He emphasized that better economic growth in the future does not require higher interest rates. He pointed out that the rise in long-term yields is partly due to improved growth expectations rather than heightened inflation concerns.

Miran expressed anticipation for Warsh's performance as Fed Chair. Wall Street Insight previously mentioned that Trump nominated former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh as the next Fed Chair, leading the market to bet on a more hawkish balance sheet policy.

## Consistent Opposition to Support Larger Scale Easing

**Miran has consistently shown a dovish stance in Fed policy decisions.** Last week, when the Fed decided to keep interest rates unchanged, he voted against it, advocating for a 25 basis point cut. When the Fed implemented a series of 25 basis point cuts at the end of last year, Miran also cast a dissenting vote, but at that time he supported a larger cut of 50 basis points.

Miran raised objections to the current interpretation of inflation data. He stated:

> "When I look at potential inflation, I really don't see a lot of very strong price pressures in the economy. I don't see a lot of strong supply-demand imbalances that require monetary policy to address."

**He believes that the reason the Fed maintains interest rates at excessively high levels is mainly due to technical flaws in the measurement of inflation, rather than actual price pressures themselves.** This viewpoint challenges the rationale for the Fed's current policy stance and provides a basis for a more aggressive rate-cutting path

### Related Stocks

- [IAI.US - ISHRS Us Brokers & Sec Exchg](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/IAI.US.md)
- [XLF.US - Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/XLF.US.md)
- [FNCL.US - Fidelity MSCI Financials Index](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/FNCL.US.md)
- [159842.CN - Yinhua CSI All Share Investment Banking & Brokerage ETF](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/159842.CN.md)

## Related News & Research

| Title | Description | URL |
|-------|-------------|-----|
| 美高院推翻 “对等关税”，接下来会发生什么？ | 美国最高法院裁定特朗普政府依据《国际紧急经济权力法案》加征关税违法，市场关注后续影响。特朗普将签署行政令实施 10% 全球统一关税。虽然 IEEPA 的法律基础被推翻，但 232、301 和 201 条款的关税不受影响。汇丰和瑞银分析认为， | [Link](https://longbridge.com/en/news/276508668.md) |
| 华尔街深度解读 “特朗普 IEEPA 关税被否”：下半年关税或下调，退税或变全面刺激，潜在的行业利好 | 华尔街分析认为，尽管政府迅速启动替代关税，但有效税率小幅下降，且 7 月后政策趋向温和。裁决的核心变量在于高达 1800 亿美元的潜在退税，其中约 1200 亿美元或转化为中期选举前的中产阶级刺激款项。由于通胀传导已基本完成，该裁决对经济增 | [Link](https://longbridge.com/en/news/276554085.md) |
| 特朗普阵营的坚定降息派动摇了？美联储理事米兰：劳动力市场改善可令今年少些降息 | 坚定降息派、特朗普亲信美联储理事米兰：美国劳动力市场的改善可以令今年少些降息。风险提示及免责条款 市场有风险，投资需谨慎。本文不构成个人投资建议，也未考虑到个别用户特殊的投资目标、财务状况或需要。用户应考虑本文中的任何意见、观点或结论是否符 | [Link](https://longbridge.com/en/news/276386713.md) |
| 科技经济 v.s.地产经济：有何不同？ | 研究表明，从地产经济转向科技经济涉及产业结构调整、发展模式变革和体制机制改革，显著影响宏观经济的生产、通胀、就业、财政和货币等关键变量。新兴产业的生产力对总产出的影响已超越地产建筑链，且新兴产业的就业特性可能导致收入与就业压力。科技经济时代 | [Link](https://longbridge.com/en/news/276679648.md) |
| 华尔街怎么看 1 月 CPI？通胀担忧暂歇，今年三次降息几率升至五成 | 因为企业经常年初涨价，CPI 往往 1 月走高，但今年 1 月核心 CPI 增速创将近五年新低。虽然住房价格持续上涨，服装、电脑等消费品显示关税影响迹象，但汽油、牛肉和鸡蛋等政治敏感类别价格下跌，去通胀压力预计未来几个月占主导。高盛认为，美 | [Link](https://longbridge.com/en/news/275938120.md) |

---

> **Disclaimer**: This article is for reference only and does not constitute any investment advice.