--- title: "Hong Hao: After Trump Spoke, the Market Was Speechless" type: "News" locale: "en" url: "https://longbridge.com/en/news/281481382.md" description: "In a prime-time address, Trump announced an escalation of the war with Iran, triggering sharp market reactions with crude oil surging 5% and U.S. stock futures falling. Despite Trump's earlier pledge to withdraw U.S. troops from the Middle East within two to three weeks, the market's response failed to fully account for the reality of ongoing tolls in the Strait of Hormuz. The decline in oil prices reflects hopes for a turning point, yet a power vacuum in the region could lead to geopolitical instability. Iran's president stated the war could end under specific conditions" datetime: "2026-04-02T07:17:30.000Z" locales: - [zh-CN](https://longbridge.com/zh-CN/news/281481382.md) - [en](https://longbridge.com/en/news/281481382.md) - [zh-HK](https://longbridge.com/zh-HK/news/281481382.md) --- > Supported Languages: [简体中文](https://longbridge.com/zh-CN/news/281481382.md) | [繁體中文](https://longbridge.com/zh-HK/news/281481382.md) # Hong Hao: After Trump Spoke, the Market Was Speechless Just now, Trump delivered a prime-time televised speech, which global markets had been eagerly awaiting. During the speech, Trump claimed that the war was "very close to being finished ... we will complete the mission very soon." However, before concluding his speech, Trump announced that the U.S. would carry out "extremely powerful strikes on Iran ... if no agreement is reached, we will strike Iran's power facilities." In other words, Trump announced an escalation of the war with Iran. The world fell silent; crude oil surged 5%, U.S. stock index futures dropped, and Asia-Pacific markets turned from gains to losses. Two days ago, Trump announced that U.S. military forces would begin withdrawing from the Middle East within two to three weeks. This statement immediately impacted global financial markets. Crude oil prices, which had soared significantly after the outbreak of war in late February, dropped below $100 per barrel. The U.S. market also recorded its best single-day performance in over a year; investors expected lower energy costs and reduced geopolitical risks, leading to a rise in the S&P 500. However, a realistic analysis of the situation shows that while the risk of a protracted U.S. war may decrease, the root causes of geopolitical instability and disruptions to global trade remain unresolved. The market reacted to the prospect of withdrawal, but it has not yet fully factored in the reality that the Strait of Hormuz will likely continue to impose tolls, nor has it fully reflected the specific demands made by the Iranian government. The current drop in oil prices reflects a "relief trade" based on hopes for a turning point in the conflict. For most of March 2026, oil tanker traffic plummeted 90% due to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz to most international shipping, keeping oil prices high and volatile. Reopening these shipping lanes is critical for global energy supplies, as roughly 20% of the world's oil passes through this chokepoint. While Trump stated the U.S. no longer needs to defend the strait and that other countries should manage their own maritime security, a U.S. withdrawal will create a power vacuum in the Middle East. In the absence of U.S. naval power, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has begun formalizing its control over the waterway. This shift is not a return to the previous status quo of free navigation, but rather the start of a regulated maritime shipping regime where passage depends on political alignment and the payment of specific fees. The Iranian President has publicly stated that the war can end if two conditions are met: first, compensation for losses incurred during the conflict, and second, formal guarantees that Iran will no longer be attacked. Realistically, while these demands reflect Iran's current posture, they remain far from U.S. requirements and pose significant hurdles to a lasting peace treaty. Direct payments to Iran are politically impossible in the U.S. and would likely be viewed as capitulation rather than a diplomatic resolution. Furthermore, once U.S. forces withdraw from the region, guarantees against future attacks become difficult to enforce. Without a substantial military presence as a deterrent or buffer, the risk of direct conflict between Iran and Israel remains high. Iran is using these demands as bargaining chips, but the gap between Tehran's requests and Washington's bottom line remains vast. The stance of the IRGC is far more hardline than that of the President. Through official media channels, the IRGC stated that they will decide when the war ends, regardless of when the U.S. withdraws. Recently, the IRGC expanded its target list to include U.S. tech companies, specifically naming Google, Apple, and Tesla. The IRGC claims that AI and tracking technologies provided by these firms were used to facilitate the assassination of Iranian leaders. They threatened to destroy the physical infrastructure and facilities of these companies if the current strikes against Iranian leadership continue. This indicates that the conflict is entering an asymmetrical phase where corporate assets and digital infrastructure will face risks even as traditional military engagement decreases. The current rally likely underestimates this factor. Logistics in the Strait of Hormuz have fundamentally changed. Before the conflict, daily vessel transits averaged about sixty. According to the latest data from satellite tracking and the IMF PortWatch system, this has dropped to an average of approximately three ships per day. Most vessels currently navigating the strait use a designated "safe corridor" within Iranian territorial waters. To use this corridor, shipping companies must provide the IRGC with detailed cargo manifests, crew lists, and identification codes. No one can pass without IRGC approval. Additionally, the Iranian Parliament recently passed the "Strait of Hormuz Management Plan," imposing formal tolls on commercial vessels. Market participants describe these as "tolls" for passage. The cost of these tolls directly impacts oil prices per barrel. For example, for a Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC) typically carrying two million barrels, a $2 million toll adds exactly $1 per barrel. Smaller tankers carrying one million barrels face an additional cost of $2 per barrel. Although these amounts are small relative to the total price of oil, they represent a long-term increase in logistics costs. When combined with other fees, the total "Hormuz tax" becomes substantial. For instance, war risk insurance premiums have risen to approximately 5% of a vessel's hull value. For a $100 million ship, the insurance for a single transit would be $5 million. This insurance cost alone adds another $2.5 per barrel for a VLCC. Currently, over eight hundred vessels are anchored outside the Strait of Hormuz, awaiting security guarantees or lower insurance rates. The cost of these idling vessels, known as demurrage, is roughly $100,000 per ship per day. Totaling Iran's tolls, increased insurance, and demurrage, the structural cost increase for oil shipped from the Persian Gulf is around $5 per barrel. **Therefore, the war premium for oil, even if Trump withdraws and the Strait of Hormuz reopens, will reach $5-10 per barrel.** Sharp fluctuations in global markets and oil prices make risk difficult to price, but the fixed-income market offers a different perspective. Our quantitative models also conflict with fundamental logic. Risk Disclosure and Disclaimer Markets carry risks; investment requires caution. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and does not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situations, or needs of individual users. Users should consider whether any opinions, views, or conclusions in this article are appropriate for their specific circumstances. Investing based on this is at the user's own risk. ### Related Stocks - [HSPC (603353.CN)](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/603353.CN.md) - [Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY.US)](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/OXY.US.md) - [United States Brent Oil (BNO.US)](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/BNO.US.md) - [Stt Strt®SPDR®S&P®Oil &GasEqpmnt&SvcsETF (XES.US)](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/XES.US.md) - [Invesco Great Wall CNI Oil&Gas ETF (159588.CN)](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/159588.CN.md) - [United States Oil (USO.US)](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/USO.US.md) - [ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO.US)](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/UCO.US.md) - [SttStrtSPDRS&POil&GasExplor&ProdtnETF (XOP.US)](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/XOP.US.md) - [iShares US Oil & Gas Explor & Prod ETF (IEO.US)](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/IEO.US.md) - [The Energy Select Sector SPDR® ETF (XLE.US)](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/XLE.US.md) - [iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC.US)](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/IXC.US.md) - [VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK.US)](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/CRAK.US.md) ## Related News & Research - [GLOBAL MARKETS-Oil resumes its climb, stocks tumble on Trump statements](https://longbridge.com/en/news/281547341.md) - [Trump says Iran has asked for a ceasefire, US wants to see Hormuz open first](https://longbridge.com/en/news/281390478.md) - [Trump speech unleashes more pain on US consumers with $5 gasoline, record diesel in sight](https://longbridge.com/en/news/281550771.md) - [Trump's fresh Iran threats give investors a risk-off reality check](https://longbridge.com/en/news/281476835.md) - [Oil up over 1% as Mideast uncertainty keeps market jittery](https://longbridge.com/en/news/281301508.md)