--- title: "Antong Holdings' Wind ESG rating has been upgraded from B to BBB, with a comprehensive score of 6.16" type: "News" locale: "en" url: "https://longbridge.com/en/news/288149726.md" description: "Antong Holdings' Wind ESG rating was upgraded from B to BBB, with a composite score of 6.16. It ranks 24th among 34 companies in the maritime transportation III industry, placing it in the top 70.59%. The scores for environmental, social, and governance dimensions are 3.39, 4.78, and 5.57, respectively. Compared to the previous period, the composite score increased by 2.14 points, mainly due to improved management practices and significant enhancements in the environmental, social, and governance dimensions" datetime: "2026-05-30T15:22:09.000Z" locales: - [zh-CN](https://longbridge.com/zh-CN/news/288149726.md) - [en](https://longbridge.com/en/news/288149726.md) - [zh-HK](https://longbridge.com/zh-HK/news/288149726.md) generator: "portal-rs" --- # Antong Holdings' Wind ESG rating has been upgraded from B to BBB, with a comprehensive score of 6.16 According to Tongbi Finance, on May 29, 2026, Antong Holdings Co., Ltd. (stock abbreviation: Antong Holdings, code: 600179.SH) had its Wind ESG rating upgraded from B to BBB. The company's comprehensive score is 6.16, slightly lower than the industry average of 6.84 in the maritime transportation III sector. Among the 34 companies in the maritime transportation III industry, it ranks 24th, placing it in the top 70.59% of the industry. The scores for the environmental, social, and governance dimensions are 3.39, 4.78, and 5.57, respectively. Compared to the previous rating, the comprehensive score increased from 4.02 to 6.16, an improvement of 2.14 points. Specifically, the contribution from management practices rose from 1.08 to 3.16, an increase of 2.08 points; the contribution from controversy events remained stable at 3.00. In terms of dimensions, the environmental dimension improved by 2.43 points, the social dimension improved by 3.74 points, and the governance dimension improved by 2.43 points. ## Rating Observation In the environmental dimension, the company has demonstrated a relatively complete climate change and energy management system, promoting carbon reduction and energy optimization through a multi-level governance structure and energy-saving technical transformation projects. The company has established a three-tier governance structure that includes an ESG leadership group, working groups, and executive groups, clarifying responsibilities and formulating systems such as the "EU-ETS Operational Management Measures (Trial)" to meet carbon emission compliance requirements. In 2025, the company's total greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1 and Scope 2) amounted to 368,429.5 tons of carbon dioxide equivalent, with direct emissions at 367,582.64 tons and indirect emissions at 846.86 tons. In terms of energy optimization, the company plans to further optimize its energy consumption structure through measures such as hull design optimization, clean energy substitution, and efficient propulsion systems, with electricity consumption projected at 1,596.04 megawatt-hours and heavy fuel oil consumption at 114,314.27 tons in 2025. Additionally, the company has adopted a new environmentally friendly powder spraying process to achieve zero emissions of three wastes and has obtained certification from the COSCO Shipping CFP&EPD platform, posting green labels to reduce its carbon footprint. However, there is still room for improvement in the disclosure of performance data in the waste and exhaust sectors, as key indicators such as total waste recycling and exhaust emissions have not yet been disclosed. In the social dimension, the company has built a strong management system in occupational health and safety production and has demonstrated a commitment to employee diversity and welfare protection in the employment sector. The company has established a safety production management committee headed by the general manager, forming a management system of "Safety Committee coordination, Safety Management Office execution, responsibilities at all levels, and full participation." It has also formulated documents such as the "Safety Production Management Regulations" to strictly implement safety production law requirements. In 2025, the company's safety production investment reached 31.2039 million yuan, accounting for 0.34% of operating income, with 29 safety training sessions covering 685 participants, achieving a coverage rate of 100%. In terms of employment, the proportion of female employees is 45.5%, and the average salary reaches 501,800 yuan. The company also provides diverse allowances and special care measures, including the construction of nursing rooms, health check-ups, and assistance from a caring fund However, key data in the employment sector, such as the incidence of occupational diseases, injury rates, safety performance indicators, employee turnover rates, and satisfaction survey results, have not been disclosed, which may affect a comprehensive assessment of related performance. In terms of governance, the company demonstrates a strong structural checks and balances mechanism and ESG governance capabilities, but there is still room for improvement in diversified governance. The proportion of independent directors on the board is 33.33%, with an attendance rate of 100%, and there are no independent directors whose terms exceed 6 years or 9 years, and the CEO does not concurrently serve as the chairman. The company has established a three-tier ESG governance structure, including a leadership group, a working group, and an executive group, with clear divisions of labor to promote the implementation of ESG strategies and goals. At the same time, the proportion of independent directors on the audit committee, compensation committee, and nomination committee is 66.67%, with the audit committee chaired by an independent non-executive director, and the compensation committee meeting the requirements. However, the proportion of female executives is 0%, and female directors account for only 11.11%, indicating room for improvement in diversity. Additionally, information related to the compensation linkage mechanism for ESG governance and the effectiveness assessment of the board has not been disclosed, which may limit a comprehensive understanding of governance effectiveness. Content generated by AI on May 29, 2026, please verify important information ### Related Stocks - [600179.CN](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/600179.CN.md) - [601866.CN](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/601866.CN.md) - [02866.HK](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/02866.HK.md) ## Related News & Research - [Sinotrans enters acting-in-concert pact with Sinotrans Container Lines over Antong stake](https://longbridge.com/en/news/297301262.md) - [Apple's new CEO faces an early test](https://longbridge.com/en/news/297643295.md) - [DWF adds Caroline Featherstone as director in public inquiries team](https://longbridge.com/en/news/297641726.md) - [15:33 ETThe Road Ahead: New Video Game Driving Simulator Helps Teens Practice Safe Driving](https://longbridge.com/en/news/297554123.md) - [RCS - Currys PLC - Yellowstone Advisory Presentation](https://longbridge.com/en/news/297630401.md) --- > **Disclaimer: This article is for reference only and does not constitute any investment advice.**