Yangjie Technology has continuously received a Wind ESG BBB rating, with a comprehensive score of 6.84

According to Tongbi Finance, on June 5, 2026, Yangzhou Yangjie Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. (stock abbreviation: Yangjie Technology, code: 300373.SZ) received a Wind ESG rating of BBB, unchanged from the previous period. The company's comprehensive score is 6.84, higher than the semiconductor product industry average of 6.07. It ranks 48th among 146 companies in the semiconductor product industry, placing it in the top 32.88% of the industry. The scores for environmental, social, and governance dimensions are 4.81, 5.42, and 6.21, respectively.

Compared to the previous rating, the comprehensive score increased from 6.67 to 6.84, an improvement of 0.17 points. The contribution from management practices rose from 3.67 to 3.86, an increase of 0.19 points. The contribution from controversy events remained stable at 2.97. By dimension, the environmental score decreased by 0.05 points, the social score increased by 0.67 points, and the governance score decreased by 0.32 points.

Rating Observation

In the environmental dimension, the company has established an energy and climate management system that includes certifications such as ISO 50001 and ISO 14064, providing institutional support for related work. In terms of emissions reduction, the company has improved energy efficiency through energy-saving renovations, process optimization, equipment upgrades, and the use of clean energy. The total greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1 and Scope 2) amount to 116,029.8 tons of carbon dioxide equivalent, with emissions per million revenue at 16.27 tons of carbon dioxide equivalent. Additionally, the company plans to add 1.36 megawatts of distributed photovoltaic installed capacity by 2025 to further promote the use of clean energy. The total energy consumption is 26,304 tons of standard coal, with energy consumption per million revenue at 3.69 tons of standard coal. The company has also assessed the operational risks posed by climate change and has implemented comprehensive measures for disaster prevention and mitigation as well as energy efficiency improvements. In terms of water resource management, the company has disclosed water-saving renovation measures, but information on key indicators such as system certification, target planning, and the proportion of fresh water still needs improvement.

In the social dimension, the company demonstrates strong research and innovation capabilities and has established a multi-dimensional management system in occupational health and safety production. Among the company's controlled or partially controlled enterprises, 50% have passed high-tech enterprise certification, and 25% have been recognized as national-level specialized and innovative small giants, with a total of 612 effective patents and R&D investment accounting for 6.61% of revenue. The company has also collaborated with Southeast University to establish a joint research and development center for wide-bandgap power devices, focusing on the R&D and industrialization of third-generation semiconductors. In terms of occupational health and safety production, the company has obtained multiple international certifications, including ISO 45001, and has deployed a high-definition video monitoring system for real-time supervision of key areas, while regularly conducting occupational disease health checks and hazard factor testing in workplaces to optimize protective measures. However, the disclosure of performance data in the field of occupational health and safety production remains insufficient, with no information on occupational disease incidence rates and injury rates available In terms of governance, the company demonstrates a certain level of standardization in board independence and ESG governance structure. The board consists of 9 members, with independent directors accounting for 33.3%, and female directors making up 11.1%, with a member attendance rate of 100%. The company has established a three-tier governance structure composed of the board of directors, the ESG leadership team, and the ESG working group, clearly defining responsibilities at different levels and regularly assessing ESG performance. Additionally, the proportion of independent directors on the audit committee, compensation committee, and nomination committee is 66.7%. However, there is an overlap between the members of the compensation committee and executives, which may impact its independence. At the same time, the company has not disclosed information regarding the linkage between ESG performance and executive compensation, or any restrictions on the incentive effects of ESG targets.

Content generated by AI on June 5, 2026, please verify important information