---
type: "Topics"
locale: "en"
url: "https://longbridge.com/en/topics/100000000878436.md"
description: "Imagine Celestial ($Marvell Tech(MRVL.US) acquisition) was public. The valuation would probably be astronomical in US markets (if I had to guess, $6-10B)Because 2028 revenue projections were $500m (q4 annualized runrate), 2029 revenue projections were $1B.And because Celestial is a core part of hyperscaler CPO programs. Celestial's 2026 Q2 earnings would have been:- Close to $0 revenue (Marvell said "revenue and earnings since the acquisition were not material")-  Losing -$12.5M/quarter ($50M/year)Would people who knew what they were talking about looking at qualification cycle players say...1. based on Celestial's Q2 P/S numbers and because it was losing -$12.5M a quarter... That it's a worthless meme stock? Or 2. with CPO hyperscaler opportunities for 2028, it should be valued at $6-10B? And I think that's a core cultural disagreement between US / EU cultures + markets. If you knew how to evaluate qualification cycle players, which number actually matters? I'd argue overwhelmingly the latter."
datetime: "2026-08-31T09:20:11.000Z"
locales:
  - [en](https://longbridge.com/en/topics/100000000878436.md)
  - [zh-CN](https://longbridge.com/zh-CN/topics/100000000878436.md)
  - [zh-HK](https://longbridge.com/zh-HK/topics/100000000878436.md)
author: "[Serenity](https://longbridge.com/en/profiles/26792196.md)"
generator: "portal-rs"
---

# Imagine Celestial ($Marvell Tech(MRVL.US) acquisit…


### Related Stocks

- [MRVL.US](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/MRVL.US.md)

---
> **Disclaimer: This article is for reference only and does not constitute any investment advice.**