---
type: "Topics"
locale: "en"
url: "https://longbridge.com/en/topics/100000000901869.md"
description: "Iggy's Journal: Three Fair Value Numbers For One Stock, And I'm Not Picking A Winner16 September 2026, PMPodcast ReleaseNew podcast's up today on UOB, and this one's less about the stock and more about a problem I ran into while trying to answer a simple question. Same stock, same day, same public data, and one data provider's own two models can't agree with each other. Analyst consensus sits near $42.98. That same provider's internal fair value model comes out at $36.37, below where UOB is actually trading. Two numbers from one source, supposedly measuring the same thing, landing on opposite conclusions.I'm not issuing a zone verdict on this one. Not because I couldn't pick a number and move on, but because the sources themselves disagree, and manufacturing certainty where the data has none isn't the kind of forensic work I want to be doing. A crowd model and analyst consensus both point to roughly a 5% discount. An internal model says the market's already paying too much. There's also a 3.9% dividend yield figure floating around that I haven't verified against a second source, so that stays out of the conclusion entirely until it checks out properly.My Personal TakeHonestly, this episode started as a straightforward "is UOB cheap" question and turned into something more useful, a look at how easily two models from the same shop can disagree without anyone flagging it. That's the kind of thing that should make you pause before treating any single fair value number as settled fact, mine included. If you hold UOB for CPF or SRS income, the honest answer today really is "unresolved," not a hedge, an actual accurate description of where the numbers sit. Worth the listen if you want to see how I sat with that instead of forcing a tidy conclusion just to have one.📺 YouTube: https://youtu.be/vxjZ58M8QMg📩 Substack: https://investingiguana.com/p/uobs-fair-value-is-43-43-or-36-dependingNot financial advice.  Cheers, Iggy 🦖"
datetime: "2026-09-16T06:05:07.000Z"
locales:
  - [en](https://longbridge.com/en/topics/100000000901869.md)
  - [zh-CN](https://longbridge.com/zh-CN/topics/100000000901869.md)
  - [zh-HK](https://longbridge.com/zh-HK/topics/100000000901869.md)
author: "[TheInvestingIguana](https://longbridge.com/en/profiles/22116548.md)"
generator: "portal-rs"
---

# Iggy's Journal: Three Fair Value Numbers For One S…


### Related Stocks

- [U11.SG](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/U11.SG.md)
- [UOVEY.US](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/UOVEY.US.md)

## Comments (2)

- **korbs23 · 2026-09-16T06:34:12.000Z · 👍 1**: those two are not measuring the same thing, a consensus target is a twelve month price forecast while a fair value model is a present value estimate, so they should not converge.
  - **TheInvestingIguana** (2026-09-16T06:54:28.000Z): Spot on, and that distinction is the exact reason I recorded the episode.A consensus price target models where the market might trade in twelve months based on forward sentiment and multiple expansion


---
> **Disclaimer: This article is for reference only and does not constitute any investment advice.**