--- title: "🚨🔥 "This is not a conspiracy, it's a liquidation!" — Have we really seen the truth behind " description: "🚨🔥 "This is not a conspiracy, it's a liquidation!" — Have we really seen the truth behind this Bitcoin crash?When the market takes a sharp dive, the first thing we see is a list of names:$Gr" type: "topic" locale: "en" url: "https://longbridge.com/en/topics/38797479.md" published_at: "2026-02-20T06:49:17.000Z" author: "[辰逸](https://longbridge.com/en/profiles/16318663)" --- # 🚨🔥 "This is not a conspiracy, it's a liquidation!" — Have we really seen the truth behind 🚨🔥 "This is not a conspiracy, it's a liquidation!" — Have we really seen the truth behind this Bitcoin crash? When the market takes a sharp dive, the first thing we see is a list of names: $Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF(BTC.US) Coinbase Kraken Binance FalconX Revolut Anchorage Digital Wintermute Then the community instantly jumps to a conclusion — "This is a coordinated, premeditated sell-off!" But if we calm down for three minutes, we might find the situation is completely different. First, what we see are on-chain outflows, not "active dumping." These institutions are essentially: Exchanges Market makers Custodian banks Institutional brokers More often than not, they are handling client funds, not using their own capital to take directional short positions. On-chain outflows could represent: Client withdrawals OTC settlements Internal wallet adjustments Market maker hedging Asset transfers after liquidations We cannot equate "outflow" directly with "dumping." Second, what truly crashes a market is usually not sell orders, but leverage. The question we should ask is not "who sold," but: Was open interest at a high level? Were funding rates overheated? Were long positions overly crowded? In a high-leverage environment, all it takes is a trigger — Price drop → Liquidations → More selling → Triggers more liquidations. This is called a liquidity cascade. Not a conspiracy, but a mechanism. Third, if it really was a "coordinated dump," what would be the cost? Multiple globally compliant platforms manipulating prices simultaneously carries extremely high risks. Legal liability, regulatory risk, brand damage — These costs far outweigh the gains from short-term volatility. We have to admit one thing: When the market falls, our brains automatically look for a "single culprit." Because that feels more comfortable. But what often causes severe market volatility are: Futures market liquidations ETF fund outflows Synchronized pullbacks in macro risk assets Market maker Gamma hedging These structural factors are more explanatory than a list of addresses. If we only focus on "who transferred how much BTC," we miss the bigger variables: U.S. Treasury yields Dollar index Equity market risk appetite Liquidity contraction The crypto market has never been an island. Finally, we need to ask ourselves one question: Do we want a dramatic story, or do we want to truly understand market mechanisms? If it's the latter, then this looks more like a typical deleveraging event, not a secret meeting. The real question is — When leverage climbs back to high levels, will we experience the same script all over again? ### Related Stocks - [BTC.US - Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/BTC.US.md) - [ABTC.US - American Bitcoin](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/ABTC.US.md) - [GBTC.US - Grayscale Bitcoin Trust BTC - ETF](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/GBTC.US.md) - [SBET.US - Sharplink](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/SBET.US.md) --- > **Disclaimer**: This article is for reference only and does not constitute any investment advice.