---
title: "Seeing cola writing rules, and then someone asks if I'm really going all in? Let's be a bit more modest."
type: "Topics"
locale: "en"
url: "https://longbridge.com/en/topics/39244325.md"
description: "Everyone can see that I've always written Gödel's first incompleteness theorem in my profile. Actually, once you understand it, you'll have a deeper understanding of the things mentioned above. The specific mathematical proof process is recommended to be looked up on your own, considering everyone's different mathematical foundations, I'll just explain it in plain language. Gödel's first incompleteness theorem sounds very impressive, but its core idea is actually like an ingenious logical trap. We can break down this complex mathematical theorem into a story about "truth" and "proof." 1. A grand dream: Is mathematics perfect? Before Gödel..."
datetime: "2026-03-13T09:53:15.000Z"
locales:
  - [en](https://longbridge.com/en/topics/39244325.md)
  - [zh-CN](https://longbridge.com/zh-CN/topics/39244325.md)
  - [zh-HK](https://longbridge.com/zh-HK/topics/39244325.md)
author: "[一发入魂](https://longbridge.com/en/profiles/9818077.md)"
---

> Supported Languages: [简体中文](https://longbridge.com/zh-CN/topics/39244325.md) | [繁體中文](https://longbridge.com/zh-HK/topics/39244325.md)


# Seeing cola writing rules, and then someone asks if I'm really going all in? Let's be a bit more modest.

As you can see, I've always had Gödel's First Incompleteness Theorem written in my profile. Actually, once you understand it, you'll have a deeper understanding of all the above.

I suggest you look up the specific mathematical proof process yourself. Considering everyone's different math backgrounds, I'll explain it in plain language.

Gödel's First Incompleteness Theorem sounds very sophisticated, but its core idea is actually like an ingenious **logical trap**.

We can break down this complex mathematical theorem into a story about "truth" and "proof."

### 1\. A Grand Dream: Is Mathematics Perfect?

Before Gödel, mathematicians had a grand dream: to establish a perfect set of rules (an axiomatic system). This system was to be like a supercomputer:

**No contradictions (consistency):** It cannot prove both "1+1=2" and "1+1=3."

**No omissions (completeness):** As long as it's a true mathematical statement, it must be derivable using these rules.

In simple terms, people thought: **If it's true, it must be provable.**

### 2\. Gödel's "Strange Loop": How Do You Prove This Sentence?

Using a technique similar to the "liar paradox," Gödel constructed a very strange sentence within the mathematical system (we'll call it the **G-sentence**):

> **G-sentence:** "Within the current set of rules, you can never prove me."

Now, let's run the logic like a computer and see what happens:

**Situation A: If you prove the G-sentence is correct.**

Here's the problem: the G-sentence says "you cannot prove me," but you just proved it. This means the system is **self-contradictory**. Once a mathematical system is self-contradictory, it completely collapses.

**Situation B: If you cannot prove the G-sentence.**

Then the content of the G-sentence ("you cannot prove me") becomes a **fact**. Since it's a fact, it is \*\*correct (true)\*\*.

**Conclusion:** In Situation B, we have found a **true** proposition that our system **cannot prove**.

### 3\. Summarized in Plain Language

Gödel's First Incompleteness Theorem, in plain language, is:

**"In any sufficiently powerful mathematical system, there will always be some propositions that are true, but we can never prove them using the rules within the system."**

It tells us: **The scope of "truth" is always larger than the scope of "proof."**

### 4\. Why is This Discovery So Great?

**Shattered the "arrogance" of mathematics:** It proved that it's impossible for humans to use finite rules to exhaust all truth. Mathematics is not a closed, dead city, but a constantly expanding universe.

**Implications for Artificial Intelligence:** Many people use this theorem to argue that human intuition (which can see that the G-sentence is true) may surpass computer algorithms based on fixed programs.

**The Limits of Reason:** It scientifically proved that rational logic has its limits.

### To Summarize

If we compare mathematics to a game, Gödel proved that: **No matter how strict the rules you set, there will always be situations in this game where you cannot determine the winner or loser based on the rules.**

You can see this as a kind of "imperfect beauty" of mathematics, or as the eternal space it leaves for the human spirit of exploration.

So it's not just mathematics; life is the same, the stock market is the same, rules are the same. Everything is manifested based on probability. So, under this probability, why would you really think of **going all in**?

## Comments (6)

- **幸运币 · 2026-03-13T12:29:34.000Z · 👍 1**: I have an electric car, I don't even need to keep three thousand, all in🤪
- **Dr.zong · 2026-03-13T10:02:16.000Z**: That's right, even going all in means a maximum position of 10%.
  - **一发入魂** (2026-03-13T10:14:59.000Z): The boss is invincible, peerless in the world, a paragon of both civil and military virtues🤪
  - **Dr.zong** (2026-03-13T10:16:40.000Z): I'm a newbie, following Cola brother and going all in.
- **亏麻了的利姆鲁 · 2026-03-13T09:59:55.000Z**: Man proposes, God disposes, so you always need to have a backup plan, like keeping some money for buying a 🛵, hehe.
  - **一发入魂** (2026-03-13T10:01:17.000Z): Then you still need to save money for warm clothes z🤪