<p>Amidst the fast-paced and highly competitive business environment of today, conducting comprehensive company analysis is essential for investors and industry enthusiasts. In this article, we will delve into an extensive industry comparison, evaluating <b>Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT)</b> in comparison to its major competitors within the Software industry. By analyzing critical financial metrics, market position, and growth potential, our objective is to provide valuable insights for investors and offer a deeper understanding of company's performance in the industry.</p>
<h3>Microsoft Background</h3>
<p>Microsoft develops and licenses consumer and enterprise software. It is known for its Windows operating systems and Office productivity suite. The company is organized into three equally sized broad segments: productivity and business processes (legacy Microsoft Office, cloud-based Office 365, Exchange, SharePoint, Skype, LinkedIn, Dynamics), intelligence cloud (infrastructure- and platform-as-a-service offerings Azure, Windows Server OS, SQL Server), and more personal computing (Windows Client, Xbox, Bing search, display advertising, and Surface laptops, tablets, and desktops).</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th><strong>Company</strong></th>
<th><strong>P/E</strong></th>
<th><strong>P/B</strong></th>
<th><strong>P/S</strong></th>
<th><strong>ROE</strong></th>
<th><strong>EBITDA (in billions)</strong></th>
<th><strong>Gross Profit (in billions)</strong></th>
<th><strong>Revenue Growth</strong></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Microsoft Corp</td>
<td>33.77</td>
<td>9.72</td>
<td>12.06</td>
<td>7.85%</td>
<td>$48.06</td>
<td>$53.63</td>
<td>18.43%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Oracle Corp</td>
<td>34.76</td>
<td>17.74</td>
<td>8.77</td>
<td>22.68%</td>
<td>$9.51</td>
<td>$10.68</td>
<td>14.22%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ServiceNow Inc</td>
<td>92.53</td>
<td>14.05</td>
<td>12.65</td>
<td>4.52%</td>
<td>$0.89</td>
<td>$2.63</td>
<td>21.81%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Palo Alto Networks Inc</td>
<td>117.65</td>
<td>14.95</td>
<td>13.80</td>
<td>4.05%</td>
<td>$0.5</td>
<td>$1.84</td>
<td>15.66%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Fortinet Inc</td>
<td>33.55</td>
<td>82.47</td>
<td>9.59</td>
<td>33.9%</td>
<td>$0.64</td>
<td>$1.39</td>
<td>14.38%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Gen Digital Inc</td>
<td>30.21</td>
<td>6.90</td>
<td>3.84</td>
<td>5.56%</td>
<td>$0.5</td>
<td>$0.95</td>
<td>25.26%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>UiPath Inc</td>
<td>38.48</td>
<td>4.49</td>
<td>5.68</td>
<td>11.08%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.34</td>
<td>15.92%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Monday.Com Ltd</td>
<td>122.66</td>
<td>6.14</td>
<td>6.87</td>
<td>1.06%</td>
<td>$0.0</td>
<td>$0.28</td>
<td>26.24%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dolby Laboratories Inc</td>
<td>25.43</td>
<td>2.43</td>
<td>4.81</td>
<td>1.89%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.27</td>
<td>0.73%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>CommVault Systems Inc</td>
<td>68.09</td>
<td>25.11</td>
<td>4.95</td>
<td>5.12%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.22</td>
<td>18.39%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qualys Inc</td>
<td>28.07</td>
<td>9.81</td>
<td>8.13</td>
<td>9.7%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>10.41%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Teradata Corp</td>
<td>24.92</td>
<td>12.83</td>
<td>1.77</td>
<td>20.25%</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>$0.25</td>
<td>-5.45%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Average</strong></td>
<td><strong>56.03</strong></td>
<td><strong>17.9</strong></td>
<td><strong>7.35</strong></td>
<td><strong>10.89%</strong></td>
<td><strong>$1.12</strong></td>
<td><strong>$1.73</strong></td>
<td><strong>14.32%</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>



<p>Through a detailed examination of Microsoft, we can deduce the following trends: </p>
<ul>
<li>
A Price to Earnings ratio of 33.77 significantly below the industry average by 0.6x suggests undervaluation. This can make the stock appealing for those seeking growth.
</li>
<li>
The current Price to Book ratio of 9.72, which is 0.54x the industry average, is substantially lower than the industry average, indicating potential undervaluation.
</li>
<li>
The Price to Sales ratio of 12.06, which is 1.64x the industry average, suggests the stock could potentially be overvalued in relation to its sales performance compared to its peers.
</li>
<li>
With a Return on Equity (ROE) of 7.85% that is 3.04% below the industry average, it appears that the company exhibits potential inefficiency in utilizing equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $48.06 Billion, which is 42.91x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
The company has higher gross profit of $53.63 Billion, which indicates 31.0x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
With a revenue growth of 18.43%, which surpasses the industry average of 14.32%, the company is demonstrating robust sales expansion and gaining market share.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1765897213_0.png?x-oss-process=image/auto-orient,1/interlace,1/resize,w_1440,h_1440/quality,q_95/format,jpg" alt="debt to equity" original-src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1765897213_0.png"/></p>

<p>The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio indicates the proportion of debt and equity used by a company to finance its assets and operations.</p>
<p>Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.</p>
<p>When examining Microsoft in comparison to its top 4 peers with respect to the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following information becomes apparent:</p>
<ul>
<li>
Among its top 4 peers, Microsoft has a stronger financial position with a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.17.
</li>
<li>
This indicates that the company relies less on debt financing and maintains a more favorable balance between debt and equity, which can be viewed positively by investors.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
<p>For Microsoft in the Software industry, the PE ratio is low compared to peers, indicating potential undervaluation. The PB ratio is also low, suggesting a possible bargain opportunity. However, the PS ratio is high, signaling rich valuation based on revenue. In terms of ROE, Microsoft shows lower profitability compared to peers. The high EBITDA and gross profit levels reflect strong operational performance, while the high revenue growth indicates a promising future trajectory.</p>
<p><em>This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.</em></p>

MSFT

MSFL

MSFO

MSFD

MSFU

MSFX

MSFY

<p>The article analyzes Microsoft's position in the software industry, comparing it to competitors using financial metrics. Microsoft shows potential undervaluation with a low PE and PB ratio, but a high PS ratio suggests rich valuation. Despite lower ROE, Microsoft demonstrates strong operational performance with high EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth. The company maintains a favorable debt-to-equity ratio, indicating a strong financial position. Overall, Microsoft exhibits promising growth potential in the industry.</p>

- This article conducts a comprehensive analysis of Microsoft within the Software industry, comparing financial metrics and market position to major competitors.  
- Microsoft demonstrates potential undervaluation with a low P/E and P/B ratio, but a high P/S ratio suggests it may be overvalued based on sales performance.  
- The analysis highlights Microsoft's strong EBITDA and gross profit, alongside solid revenue growth, indicating a robust operational performance and promising future trajectory.

Understanding Microsoft's Position In Software Industry Compared To Competitors