The conflict in Iran has brought one issue back to the forefront: energy security risk resembles a &#34;norm&#34; rather than an isolated event. Fluctuations in oil and gas prices and uncertainty in the LNG supply chain are pulling the global energy transition away from a &#34;long-term decarbonization narrative&#34; and back to &#34;immediate supply assurance and resilience,&#34; with investment themes consequently narrowing to the few segments capable of addressing real-world constraints—grid infrastructure, energy storage, critical materials, and more cost-effective electrification pathways.
According to Zhui Feng Trading Desk, Phineas Glover, a Global Research Analyst at UBS, stated directly in his latest thematic report: &#34;Energy security reshapes the transition.&#34; Following this main thread, the report attributes key changes this month to: after the elevation of the energy security premium, whoever can make the power system more stable, reduce energy import dependence, and make cost fluctuations more controllable is more likely to become the &#34;certainty outlet&#34; for capital.
Specifically regarding sectors, the report emphasizes two &#34;hard constraint&#34; chains: one is the grid and power equipment—where orders and supply bottlenecks coexist with extended visibility; the other is battery energy storage—where, in an environment of price volatility, storage has transformed from an &#34;option&#34; into a &#34;hedging tool.&#34; Upstream, the mid-term logic of tight balance for transition materials such as lithium and rare earths has been reinforced once again.
However, the report does not shy away from boundary conditions: large projects like the grid are more sensitive to interest rates and inflation; the storage chain, despite strong demand, is beginning to expose differences in profitability and delivery execution; and China's short-term weakness in passenger vehicle NEV demand coexists with strong exports and commercial vehicles. Meanwhile, alternative fuels and sustainable fertilizers have not been directly included in the core allocation of &#34;best ideas,&#34; but remain in an observation zone where positions may be added or paused at any time.
<h2>Return of the Energy Security Premium: Transition Must First Address &#34;Import Dependence&#34; and &#34;System Resilience&#34;</h2>
Disturbances in the Middle East have led to a re-pricing of oil and LNG supply risks, shifting market focus to near-term shock resistance capabilities and higher domestic diversification.
It is not just the fuel itself that is being impacted, but also a series of &#34;transition economics&#34;—the substitution relationship between diesel and biofuels, the total cost comparison between internal combustion engine vehicles and electric vehicles, the transmission of fertilizer costs to food inflation, and the role division between nuclear power and renewables within the system.
This is why the report narrows the definition of &#34;transition winners&#34; from broad new energy to infrastructure and system integration: when energy insecurity becomes a pricing factor, solving bottlenecks is more valuable than simple capacity expansion.
<h2>Energy Storage is the Clearest Inflection Point: Payback Period Compressed Directly by Price Volatility</h2>
The report views BESS as the most clear-cut &#34;inflection point theme&#34; this month. A core piece of evidence comes from the economic shifts during the previous energy crisis: between 2022–23, total storage deployment rose from 4GWh in 2021 to 17GWh in 2023; among them, residential storage increased from 2.5GWh to 12.2GWh, with the payback period compressing from approximately 7–10 years to 3–4 years. The logic is straightforward: the more volatile electricity and fuel prices are, the more storage resembles &#34;insurance.&#34;
On the supply side, the report emphasizes that CATL remains the leader on the cost front; it also expects LG Energy Solution to reach approximately 50GWh of LFP storage capacity by the end of 2026, mentioning a broader potential pipeline of about 140GWh.
However, strong demand does not automatically equate to strong profits. The report uses Sungrow Power Supply's FY25 earnings miss as a reminder: raw material costs and project delivery schedules will widen the gap; what follows is watching whether strong demand can translate into more stable profitability under different business models (ancillary services, capacity pricing, etc.).
<h2>Grid Equipment: Extended Order Visibility, but Interest Rates Determine &#34;Start Speed&#34;</h2>
Grid and power equipment remain a structurally overweight direction in the report. Supporting points include load growth driven by electrification, investments in safety and resilience, and persistent supply constraints for high-voltage equipment such as transformers and cables.
Industry leaders Schneider Electric, ABB, Nexans, and Prysmian have shown strong order performance, and the report also notes that shortages of critical grid equipment in the U.S. have extended delivery times to up to five years in some cases, with supply bottlenecks themselves shaping bargaining power and order sustainability.
But the grid is not a narrative of &#34;only rising, never falling.&#34; This sector is increasingly described as a &#34;Curate's Egg&#34;: fundamentals are improving, but macro sensitivity is also increasing. Sustained high energy prices could drive up inflation and raise interest rates, thereby increasing financing costs for capital-intensive grid projects and slowing down project timelines. The report maintains its overweight stance but adopts a more cautious tone—essentially acknowledging that &#34;strong demand&#34; and &#34;not necessarily fast pace&#34; can coexist.
<h2>Electrification Divergence: Passenger Vehicles Under Pressure, Exports and Commercial Vehicles Carry the Flag</h2>
The report defines the keyword for electrification as &#34;divergence but not extinguished.&#34; The contradictions in the Chinese market are most concentrated: total NEV sales in January–February 2026 fell 6.9% year-on-year to 1.71 million units, with passenger vehicle NEV sales dropping 25.7% year-on-year; however, new energy vehicle exports surged 110% year-on-year, with export penetration approaching half of passenger vehicle exports, expanding to markets such as Brazil, the UK, and the UAE. Structurally, B-segment NEV sales grew 9.4% year-on-year, while A00/A-segment sales declined, indicating a shift in demand toward &#34;higher-end, stronger product capabilities.&#34;
Consequently, the report maintains a preference for &#34;multimodal electrification&#34;: the economics of electric two-wheelers, electric buses, and electric trucks rely more heavily on high utilization rates, allowing them to better convert oil price and fuel uncertainty into increased penetration. It also explicitly places passenger vehicle OEMs in a more cautious position, concerned about profit margins and competitive pressure.
<img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://wpimg-wscn.awtmt.com/372ceb44-dcd9-43e5-b103-18b5ac015989.png?x-oss-process=image/auto-orient,1/interlace,1/resize,w_1440,h_1440/quality,q_95/format,jpg" alt="" original-src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://wpimg-wscn.awtmt.com/372ceb44-dcd9-43e5-b103-18b5ac015989.png"/>
<h2>Transition Materials Tightened Again: Mid-Term Constraint Logic for Lithium and Rare Earths Reinforced</h2>
Accelerating storage and electrification will bring greater certainty to upstream materials. UBS maintains structural overweight ratings for transition materials and provides a set of transmission clues &#34;from events to materials&#34;:
<ul>
<li>
Lithium: Ganfeng Lithium's FY2025 net profit was RMB463m, with Q4 profit growing 198% quarter-on-quarter and production increasing 24% year-on-year. Meanwhile, the report used the Strait of Hormuz scenario for calculations: if disrupted, it could block approximately 13 million barrels per day (Mbpd) of crude oil supply (about 12% of global supply), and emphasized the push from high oil prices on EV economics and lithium demand by noting that &#34;replacing half the deficit theoretically requires about 385 million EVs.&#34;
</li>
<li>
Rare Earths: The Lynas-JARE agreement introduced a US$110/kgNdPr floor price and volume commitments; UBS raised its long-term NdPr price assumption from a US$100/kg floor to US$120/kg, adjusting the near-term forecast through 2029.
</li>
<li>
Nickel: Indonesia's 2026 ore quota has been reset to 260–270 million wet metric tons (wmt), significantly lower than the 379 million wmt in 2025; the report believes tighter raw materials will lift the nickel price &#34;floor,&#34; benefiting integrated producers who can better absorb cost volatility.
</li>
</ul>
The report's conclusion is not flashy: when &#34;supply chain security&#34; enters the main narrative of energy transition, pricing at the material level no longer looks only at the demand curve but also at the pace of regionalization and de-concentration.
<h2>Alternative Fuels and Fertilizers: Opportunities Lie in &#34;Policy and Supply,&#34; Risks in &#34;Inflation Spillover&#34;</h2>
The report places alternative fuels and sustainable fertilizers in a position of &#34;being re-evaluated,&#34; as both reasons point to second-order effects brought by energy security.
Regarding alternative fuels, U.S. biofuel policy support has strengthened: the final RVO increased the biodiesel obligation volume, and introduced stronger domestic tilt for &#34;overseas fuels and feedstocks receiving only half compliance value&#34; starting in 2028. Meanwhile, more projects and financing are advancing for SAF, e-methanol, and hydrogen shipping pathways, but constraints lie in bankability, certification, and infrastructure rather than technology itself.
For fertilizers, the story has shifted from &#34;price shocks&#34; to &#34;supply, logistics, and timing risks.&#34; As of April 7, urea prices had risen approximately 50% since the outbreak of conflict; the share of the Middle East in relevant maritime trade (such as urea, ammonia, sulfur), combined with natural gas accounting for 60–80% of fertilizer costs, makes energy price fluctuations more prone to spilling over into fertilizer and food inflation. India has signed a 10-year agreement to supply 7.24 lakh tons of green ammonia annually, attempting to reduce import dependence through longer-term supply arrangements.
These themes have not yet been directly &#34;bet on&#34; by the report mainly because there are too many variables: policy realization, raw material availability, and inflation sensitivity can all alter the risk/reward ratio.

03750

300750

515030

Resurgent tensions in Iran have reignited anxieties over energy security, with UBS's latest research report stating directly that "Energy security is reshaping the transition path." Amid a re-pricing of oil and gas supply risks, capital is converging from broad new energy narratives to sectors that genuinely address bottlenecks: visibility for grid equipment orders has extended, and storage payback periods have compressed from seven years to three years, becoming a "hedging tool." The mid-term logic of tight balance for lithium, rare earth, and nickel materials has been reinforced. Whoever can reduce import dependence and stabilize system resilience will be the true winners of this transformation

- The ongoing conflict in Iran highlights energy security risks as a persistent concern rather than an isolated incident, reshaping discussions around global energy transition.  
- UBS analysts emphasize the connection between energy security and investments in energy systems, particularly in stabilizing power grids and enhancing storage solutions amid supply chain uncertainties.  
- The report indicates that key materials like lithium and rare earths will face tighter constraints, impacting pricing and market dynamics as energy transition efforts intensify.

The Core Driver Behind the Rise of CATL and Others — Energy Security