--- title: "YISHENG maintains a Wind ESG rating of B, with a comprehensive score of 4.67" type: "News" locale: "en" url: "https://longbridge.com/en/news/288502999.md" description: "YISHENG's Wind ESG rating remains at B, with a comprehensive score of 4.67, below the industry average for food. It ranks 164th among 231 peers. The environmental dimension scores low and lacks sufficient disclosure, but there have been improvements in the social and governance dimensions. The company has practical experience in energy-saving and emission-reduction technologies, but there are shortcomings in the disclosure of key data; human resource management and supply chain efficiency perform well" datetime: "2026-06-03T02:00:15.000Z" locales: - [zh-CN](https://longbridge.com/zh-CN/news/288502999.md) - [en](https://longbridge.com/en/news/288502999.md) - [zh-HK](https://longbridge.com/zh-HK/news/288502999.md) generator: "portal-rs" --- # YISHENG maintains a Wind ESG rating of B, with a comprehensive score of 4.67 According to Tongbi Finance, on June 2, 2026, Shandong Yisheng Livestock and Poultry Breeding Co., Ltd. (stock abbreviation: Yisheng, code: 002458.SZ) received a Wind ESG rating of B, unchanged from the previous period. The company's overall score is 4.67, below the food industry average of 5.70. It ranks 164th among 231 companies in the food industry, placing it in the bottom 29%. The scores for the environmental, social, and governance dimensions are 0.08, 1.94, and 5.67, respectively. Compared to the previous rating, the overall score increased from 4.45 to 4.67, an improvement of 0.22 points. The score for management practices rose from 1.46 to 1.70, an increase of 0.24 points. The score for controversy events remained stable at 2.97. By dimension, the environmental score decreased by 0.04 points, while the social score increased by 0.53 points, and the governance score increased by 0.46 points. ## Rating Observation In the environmental dimension, the company demonstrated its capability in energy conservation and emission reduction through technological innovation, but still lacks in the disclosure of management systems and quantitative performance data. Its holding subsidiary has developed and widely applied heat recovery technology, which recycles heat from livestock houses, eliminating the need for supplementary heat sources at -10 degrees Celsius and achieving more significant energy savings at -20 to -30 degrees Celsius. This technology not only reduces winter heating costs but also decreases harmful gas emissions, reflecting active exploration in climate change and energy issues. However, the company still has blank disclosures regarding key data such as greenhouse gas emissions, total energy consumption, and the proportion of renewable energy, as well as related management systems and certifications. Additionally, the disclosure of information regarding water resources and raw materials needs improvement, with no specific content on related goals or practices. In the social dimension, the company has demonstrated strong organizational capabilities and performance in human resource management and supply chain management. It has established a systematic human resource management system, including compensation management, a dual-track career development system, and long-term incentive measures such as employee stock ownership plans. In supply chain management, the company implements a centralized procurement model, establishing a graded evaluation and dynamic management mechanism for suppliers, prioritizing high-grade suppliers, and disclosing accounts payable and notes payable turnover days as 76.18 days, with a cash conversion cycle of -8.18 days, reflecting high capital turnover efficiency. However, quantitative performance data in occupational health and safety, such as occupational disease incidence and injury rates, still need to be supplemented, and disclosures in customer management are also relatively scarce. In the governance dimension, the company shows high transparency and standardization in board independence and audit committee professionalism. The board consists of 7 members, with independent directors accounting for 42.86%, 1 employee representative director, and the CEO not serving as chairman, with a member attendance rate of 100%. The audit committee has 66.67% independent directors, with the chair being an independent non-executive director, and it held 7 meetings during the reporting period, demonstrating strong independence and professionalism. However, the company still lacks sufficient disclosure on key issues such as ESG governance structure and the linkage of executive compensation to ESG performance, with the proportion of female executives at 0%, indicating room for improvement in gender diversity In addition, there is no specific content regarding the disclosure of the anti-corruption management system and related training and supervision mechanisms. Content generated by AI on June 2, 2026, please verify important information ### Related Stocks - [002458.CN](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/002458.CN.md) ## Related News & Research - [09:58 ETRich Products Named to Forbes America's Best Employers for Company Culture 2026 Ranking](https://longbridge.com/en/news/296503257.md) - [Beijing Joy Capital announces availability of 2025 ESG and Sustainability Report](https://longbridge.com/en/news/296583354.md) - [Ofis Yem Issues TSRS-Compliant 2025 Sustainability Report With Detailed Climate Disclosures](https://longbridge.com/en/news/296263312.md) - [Sarona Asset Management outlines responsible-exit framework to protect ESG impact after divestments](https://longbridge.com/en/news/296226759.md) - [Origem Energia adopts ESG, risk management policies to align with B3 Novo Mercado rules](https://longbridge.com/en/news/296632012.md) --- > **Disclaimer: This article is for reference only and does not constitute any investment advice.**