Lianyungang Wind ESG rating remains at B, with a comprehensive score of 4.81

According to Tongbi Finance, on June 2, 2026, Jiangsu Lianyungang Port Co., Ltd. (stock abbreviation: Lianyungang, code: 601008.SH) received a Wind ESG rating of B, unchanged from the previous period. The company's comprehensive score is 4.81, lower than the average scores of 6.67 for the port and service industry. Among 32 companies in the port and service industry, it ranks 29th, placing it in the bottom 10% of the industry. The scores for the environmental, social, and governance dimensions are 1.92, 1.67, and 4.81, respectively.

Compared to the previous rating, the comprehensive score increased from 4.66 to 4.81, an improvement of 0.15 points. The score for management practices rose from 1.69 to 1.81, an increase of 0.12 points. The score for controversy events remained stable at 2.99. By dimension, the environmental score decreased by 0.78 points, the social score increased by 0.32 points, and the governance score increased by 1.00 point.

Rating Observation

In the environmental dimension, the company has demonstrated a certain level of foundational capability in environmental management system certification and environmental protection investment. The company has passed third-party audits for quality, environmental, occupational health and safety, and energy management systems, indicating compliance and execution in environmental management. Additionally, total environmental protection investment reached 35 million yuan, accounting for 1.36% of operating revenue, reflecting the strength of financial investment. In wastewater management, the company regularly conducts environmental inspections in the port area and special rectifications, completing over 200 rectification tasks and achieving full compliance in wastewater and solid waste management. However, information disclosure regarding climate change, energy, and water resources is relatively limited, lacking systematic management goals and quantitative performance data, particularly regarding greenhouse gas emissions and their management targets, which still need to be supplemented.

In the social dimension, the company has formed a relatively comprehensive management loop in occupational health and safety production. The company has obtained certification for its occupational health and safety management system, with annual safety production investment reaching 22.0352 million yuan, accounting for 0.86% of operating revenue. At the same time, over 300 hidden dangers have been rectified, and 57 safety inspections and special checks have been conducted, establishing a regular risk identification and hidden danger investigation mechanism. In terms of employment, the company implements a salary policy that combines job performance pay with benefits, providing various welfare guarantees such as corporate annuities and paid leave. Additionally, the company has distributed a total of 492,100 yuan in medical assistance and hardship relief funds to employees, demonstrating a certain level of employee care. However, disclosures regarding research and innovation, employee development and training, and customer issues are relatively scarce, lacking systematic information, especially regarding key performance data such as employee training coverage and average training hours per employee.

In the governance dimension, the company has demonstrated a strong checks and balances mechanism, but there is still room for improvement in diversification and ESG governance. The proportion of independent directors on the board is 33.33%, with no independent directors serving terms exceeding 6 or 9 years, indicating a certain level of independence and rotation mechanism. The CEO does not concurrently serve as the chairman, the chair of the audit committee is an independent non-executive director, and the proportion of independent directors is 66.67%, further strengthening the checks and balances in governance The attendance rate of board members reached 100%, with no director attending less than 75% of meetings, reflecting a high level of governance participation. However, the proportion of female directors is 0%, and the proportion of female executives is 20%, indicating significant room for improvement in diversity. In addition, the ESG governance structure and compensation linkage mechanism have not been disclosed, which may limit the actual driving force of ESG governance.

Content generated by AI on June 2, 2026, please verify important information