--- title: "Milkground has continuously received a Wind ESG A rating, with a comprehensive score of 7.44" type: "News" locale: "en" url: "https://longbridge.com/en/news/289158644.md" description: "Milkground's latest Wind ESG rating is A, with a comprehensive score of 7.44, higher than the industry average. It ranks 29th among 231 food companies, placing it in the top 12.55%. The scores for environmental, social, and governance dimensions are 4.60, 6.72, and 7.72, respectively. Compared to the previous period, the total score increased by 0.33 points, mainly due to significant improvements in the environmental and social dimensions, although the governance dimension saw a slight decline. The company performs outstandingly in water resource management and occupational health and safety" datetime: "2026-06-09T08:30:41.000Z" locales: - [zh-CN](https://longbridge.com/zh-CN/news/289158644.md) - [en](https://longbridge.com/en/news/289158644.md) - [zh-HK](https://longbridge.com/zh-HK/news/289158644.md) generator: "portal-rs" --- # Milkground has continuously received a Wind ESG A rating, with a comprehensive score of 7.44 According to Tongbi Finance, on June 9, 2026, Shanghai Milkground Food Technology Co., Ltd. (stock abbreviation: Milkground, code: 600882.SH) received a Wind ESG rating of A, unchanged from the previous period. The company's comprehensive score is 7.44, higher than the food industry average of 5.71. It ranks 29th among 231 companies in the food industry, placing it in the top 12.55% of the industry. The scores for the environmental, social, and governance dimensions are 4.60, 6.72, and 7.72, respectively. Compared to the previous rating, the comprehensive score increased from 7.11 to 7.44, an improvement of 0.33 points. Specifically, the score for management practices rose from 4.12 to 4.49, an increase of 0.37 points; the score for controversy events remained stable at 2.95. In terms of dimensions, the environmental score improved by 1.41 points, the social score increased by 0.47 points, while the governance score decreased by 0.28 points. ## Rating Observation In the environmental dimension, the company demonstrated a high level of disclosure integrity in water resource management and climate change response, establishing a multi-tiered management system. In terms of water resource management, the company has developed internal systems such as the "Milkground Water Resource Management" and promotes a systematic management model through water-saving certified factories. During the reporting period, the total water consumption of the company was 1,047,011 tons, with a total of 14,875 tons of water recycled and reused, resulting in a recycling rate of 1.44%. Throughout the year, the company saved 14,875 tons of water through water-saving technological transformation projects. All six of the company's production plants are not located in water-scarce areas. Regarding climate change response, the company's Sustainable Development and Strategy Committee, established under the board of directors, is responsible for management. The total greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1 and Scope 2) amounted to 79,726.5 tons of carbon dioxide equivalent, with photovoltaic self-generated electricity reaching 4.6 million kilowatt-hours, reducing carbon emissions by 2,468 tons. Additionally, two of the company's factories have obtained ISO 50001 energy management system certification and completed photovoltaic grid connection to reduce Scope 2 emissions. Although the company's management in water resources and climate change is relatively systematic, there is still room for improvement in information disclosure regarding raw material management goals and energy management goals. In the social dimension, the company has demonstrated strong systematic management capabilities in occupational health and safety production, achieving significant results in product and service quality. In the field of occupational health and safety production, the company has established a systematic management system directly managed by board members and has dedicated EHS personnel. The Tianjin and Helin factories have obtained ISO 45001 certification. The company's investment in safety production reached 7.78 million yuan, accounting for 0.138% of operating income, and has enhanced employee safety awareness through 100% coverage of safety training. In terms of performance, the company achieved the goals of zero occupational diseases, zero work-related deaths, and zero safety accidents. In the product and service sector, six of the company's factories have obtained certifications such as ISO 9001, FSSC 22000, and HACCP, with a product pass rate of 100% and a recall rate of 0%. Furthermore, the company has strengthened quality management through dual certification from CNAS and CMA Although the company performs well in occupational health and safety production and product quality management, there is still room for improvement in the coverage of supply chain certification and the disclosure of quantitative performance data in the employment sector. In terms of governance, the company demonstrates certain management capabilities in board independence and anti-corruption governance, but there are still deficiencies in diversity and disclosures in some areas. The proportion of independent directors on the board is 33.33%, and the proportion of independent directors on the audit committee is 100%, with no independent directors serving terms exceeding 6 years or 9 years. The company clearly defines the responsibilities of the nomination committee in the selection of directors, requiring full consideration of diversity factors and regular assessments of board effectiveness. In terms of anti-corruption governance, the company has established a system led by the board of directors, covering reporting, investigation, and feedback processes, and has set up public reporting channels and whistleblower protection mechanisms. Additionally, the coverage of integrity commitments signed by suppliers reaches 100%. However, the proportion of female executives is only 20%, which may limit further improvements in diversity, and there is still room for improvement in the disclosure of the risk management committee and information on antitrust risk control. Content generated by AI on June 9, 2026, please verify important information ### Related Stocks - [600882.CN](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/600882.CN.md) ## Related News & Research - [Ser Educacional: Major Brazilian education group with strong growth, robust financials, and leading ESG practices](https://longbridge.com/en/news/296542016.md) - [Sarona Asset Management outlines responsible-exit framework to protect ESG impact after divestments](https://longbridge.com/en/news/296226759.md) - [Beijing Joy Capital announces availability of 2025 ESG and Sustainability Report](https://longbridge.com/en/news/296583354.md) - [CTBC Financial Holding Co: Record profit and equity growth in 1H26, with strong banking, insurance, and ESG performance](https://longbridge.com/en/news/296192920.md) - [Unipar Carbocloro: Strong financials, capacity expansion, and ESG leadership drive resilient growth](https://longbridge.com/en/news/296149106.md) --- > **Disclaimer: This article is for reference only and does not constitute any investment advice.**