HUI LYU ECOLOGICAL Wind ESG rating maintained at BB, with a comprehensive score of 5.64
I'm LongbridgeAI, I can summarize articles.HUI LYU ECOLOGICAL Wind ESG rating remains at BB, with a composite score of 5.64, slightly below the industry average. The environmental dimension improved by 0.35 points, and the governance dimension improved by 0.56 points, but a decline of 0.79 points in the social dimension led to a slight decrease in the total score. The company performs well in climate governance and waste management, receiving ISO certification, but there is insufficient disclosure regarding raw material management
According to Tongbi Finance, on June 9, 2026, HUI LYU ECOLOGICAL Technology Group Co., Ltd. (stock abbreviation: HUI LYU ECOLOGICAL, code: 001267.SZ) received a Wind ESG rating of BB, unchanged from the previous period. The company's overall score is 5.64, slightly below the industry average of 5.90 for the communication equipment III sector. It ranks 59th among 128 companies in the communication equipment III industry, placing it in the top 46.09% of the industry. The scores for the environmental, social, and governance dimensions are 3.61, 2.83, and 6.00, respectively.
Compared to the previous rating, the overall score decreased from 5.78 to 5.64, a drop of 0.14 points. The contribution from management practices fell from 2.79 to 2.74, a decrease of 0.05 points. The contribution from controversy events remained stable at 2.91. In terms of dimensions, the environmental dimension improved by 0.35 points, the social dimension decreased by 0.79 points, and the governance dimension increased by 0.56 points.
Rating Observation
In the environmental dimension, the company demonstrated a comprehensive management system and practical capabilities, particularly excelling in climate change and waste management. Based on the existing environmental management system of its subsidiaries, the company established a climate governance framework of "headquarters coordinating strategy, subsidiaries implementing differentiated actions," covering the entire production and operation process through a layered management model. During the reporting period, the company disclosed greenhouse gas emission data for Scope 1 and Scope 2, totaling 6,006 tons of carbon dioxide equivalent, with Scope 1 emissions at 118 tons and Scope 2 emissions at 5,888 tons. Additionally, the company has achieved its goal of 100% compliant disposal of solid waste by 2025 and regulates the disposal of hazardous waste, such as spent activated carbon filter cartridges and waste glue bottles, through specialized hazardous waste disposal units. The company has also obtained GB/T 24001-2016/ISO 14001:2015 environmental management system certification, covering its subsidiaries and maintaining 100% effective operation of the system. However, disclosures in the area of raw material management remain insufficient, and the completeness of related information needs further improvement.
In the social dimension, the company focused on disclosing relevant practices in supply chain management and R&D innovation capability building. In terms of the supply chain, the company has developed the "Control Procedures for External Processes, Products, and Services," covering supplier classification, development and introduction, and performance evaluation management, and has implemented an ESG special audit mechanism for high-risk suppliers to ensure a closed-loop rectification process to enhance supply chain sustainability. In the R&D field, the company disclosed a total of 218 effective patents, with R&D investment accounting for 2.73% of operating revenue, and has 141 R&D employees, accounting for 16.53% of total employees. At the same time, the company has established a systematic intellectual property management strategy, including the "Management Measures for Scientific and Technological Achievements" and the "Patent Management Measures," and regularly organizes intellectual property training to strengthen protection awareness. Although the company has rich disclosures in supply chain and R&D innovation, performance indicators in occupational health and safety production, such as injury rates and occupational disease incidence, as well as information on green design and product recall procedures in product and service issues, still need to be supplemented In terms of governance, the company has demonstrated a relatively complete structural arrangement, covering aspects such as board independence and ESG governance mechanisms. The proportion of independent directors on the board is 33.33%, with an attendance rate of 100%, and there are no independent directors whose terms exceed 6 years or 9 years. The company has established a three-tier ESG governance structure consisting of a decision-making layer, a guiding layer, and an execution layer, with the board serving as the highest responsible body, responsible for reviewing and deciding on ESG strategic planning. The proportion of independent directors on the compensation committee and the nomination committee is both 66.67%, and the arrangement where the CEO does not concurrently serve as chairman further strengthens the governance checks and balances. Additionally, the proportion of female directors is 22.22%, and the proportion of female executives is 20%, indicating that there is still room for improvement in gender diversity. Meanwhile, the company's disclosures regarding the linkage between performance and executive compensation, ESG training, and report verification in ESG governance are still relatively limited, and supplementary information in this regard will help further improve the governance system.
Content generated by AI on June 9, 2026, please verify important information
