Longtech's Wind ESG rating has been upgraded to A, with a comprehensive score of 7.29, leading the ratings in the electronic devices, instruments, and components industry
I'm LongbridgeAI, I can summarize articles.On June 9, 2026, Longtech's Wind ESG rating was upgraded from BB to A, with a comprehensive score of 7.29, ranking in the top 13.27% of the electronic equipment industry. The scores for environmental, social, and governance dimensions were 5.23, 6.38, and 6.55, respectively. The company performed outstandingly in waste management, climate change response, and research and development innovation, but there is still room for improvement in the disclosure of key performance indicators
According to Tongbi Finance, on June 9, 2026, Shenzhen Longtech Intelligent Control Co., Ltd. (stock abbreviation: Longtech Intelligent, code: 300916.SZ) had its Wind ESG rating upgraded from BB to A. The company's comprehensive score is 7.29, higher than the industry average of 5.76 for electronic devices, instruments, and components. It ranks 67th among 505 companies in the electronic devices, instruments, and components industry, placing it in the top 13.27% of the industry. The scores for the environmental, social, and governance dimensions are 5.23, 6.38, and 6.55, respectively.
Compared to the previous rating, the comprehensive score increased from 5.17 to 7.29, an improvement of 2.12 points. The contribution from management practices rose from 2.18 to 4.29, an increase of 2.11 points. The contribution from controversy events remained stable at 3.00. By dimension, the environmental dimension improved by 3.55 points, the social dimension by 3.65 points, and the governance dimension by 1.25 points.
Rating Observation
In the environmental dimension, the company has demonstrated strong management capabilities and practical results in waste management and climate change response. The company and its subsidiaries have obtained ISO 14001 environmental management system certification and have established a "Waste Control Procedure," with the Human Resources Department coordinating waste management to ensure resource recovery and harmless treatment. During the reporting period, the total waste generated by the company was 447.67 tons, of which 439 tons were non-hazardous waste and 8.67 tons were hazardous waste, achieving full-process closed-loop management through classified collection and professional disposal. In terms of climate change response, the company has implemented 14 energy-saving and emission-reduction measures, including technological upgrades and management optimization, saving 226,400 kWh of electricity and 1,000 tons of water annually, with a carbon reduction of 12.92 tons of CO2 equivalent. Additionally, the company is gradually promoting the use of green energy and the development of energy-efficient products to address climate change risks. However, there is still room for improvement in the completeness of disclosures regarding waste management targets and recycling rates, among other key performance indicators.
In the social dimension, the company has established a relatively systematic management system in research and development (R&D) and occupational health and safety production. On the R&D front, the company has formed a systematic structure from project approval to implementation tracking based on systems such as the "Design and Development Control Procedure," with R&D investment accounting for 4.33% of operating revenue, a total of 139 effective patents, an effective patent count of 8.67 per 100 million revenue, and 57 software copyrights, demonstrating a certain ability to convert innovative results. In terms of occupational health and safety production, the company has obtained ISO 45001 certification and set targets for zero occupational disease cases, zero work-related deaths, and zero major safety incidents for the year, while achieving a 100% pass rate for occupational disease hazard factor detection and a 100% coverage rate for employee occupational health checks. Furthermore, the company enhances its emergency response capabilities through emergency plans and safety training. However, information disclosure in the supply chain area still needs improvement, particularly regarding the proportion of sustainably certified suppliers and labor protection In terms of governance, the company shows certain highlights in board independence, gender diversity, and ESG governance structure. The proportion of independent directors on the board is 42.86%, with a member attendance rate of 100%, and there are no independent directors whose tenure exceeds 6 years or who serve as directors for more than 3 listed companies. The company has established a three-tier ESG governance structure of "decision-making level - management level - execution level," with the board's Strategy and Sustainability Committee overseeing ESG work and monitoring significant issues. The proportion of female executives reaches 100%, and the proportion of female directors is 42.86%, reflecting a high level of gender diversity. However, the overlap between the compensation committee members and executives may pose certain challenges to the independence of compensation decisions, and the specific mechanism linking ESG performance to executive compensation has not yet been disclosed.
Content generated by AI on June 9, 2026, please verify important information
