According to Tongbi Finance, on June 2, 2026, China National Materials International Engineering Co., Ltd. (stock abbreviation: Sinoma International, code: 600970.SH) received a Wind ESG rating of AA, unchanged from the previous period. The company's overall score is 8.14, higher than the average score of 5.93 in the construction and engineering III industry. It ranks 3rd among 251 companies in the construction and engineering III industry, placing it in the top 1.20% of the industry. The scores for the environmental, social, and governance dimensions are 4.99, 8.37, and 8.28, respectively.

Compared to the previous rating, the overall score increased from 8.10 to 8.14, an improvement of 0.04 points. The contribution from management practices rose from 5.10 to 5.14, also an increase of 0.04 points. The contribution from controversy events remained stable at 3.00. By dimension, the environmental dimension improved by 0.07 points, the social dimension increased by 0.22 points, while the governance dimension decreased by 0.24 points.

Rating Observation

In the environmental dimension, the company demonstrated multi-level capabilities from climate change management to waste recycling. The company has developed a carbon peak and carbon neutrality implementation plan, clarifying the timetable and roadmap, which is supervised by the board's strategy, investment, and ESG committee. The total greenhouse gas emissions amount to 770,300.66 tons of carbon dioxide equivalent, with direct emissions accounting for 79.4%. In waste management, the recycling rate reached 70.98%, with a total recycling volume of 3,483.91 tons, and plans to increase the capacity for external solid waste disposal to 2.75 million tons per year by 2026. Additionally, the company has transformed ore waste into construction materials through resource utilization measures and has recycled and reused old tires. However, the information disclosure in the fields of green building and environmental management is relatively limited, particularly regarding the performance data of newly added green building areas and certification projects, which still need to be supplemented.

In the social dimension, the company has shown strong management capabilities and investment in occupational health and safety production as well as R&D innovation. The company covers 73% of its enterprises with ISO 45001 certification and has established a three-tiered governance structure. The incidence of occupational diseases and work-related deaths is zero, and the injury rate per million working hours remains zero. The safety training coverage rate is 100%, with an average safety training duration of 36.21 hours per person. In terms of R&D, the company's R&D investment accounts for 3.66% of revenue, with a total of 1,635 valid patents held, and a high-tech enterprise certification coverage rate of 62.5%. Furthermore, the total training duration for employees exceeds 1.46 million hours, with an average training duration of 103.23 hours per person, achieving a coverage rate of 100%. However, there is still room for improvement in the completeness of information regarding engineering quality and construction safety, as well as the disclosure of R&D management objectives.

In the governance dimension, the company demonstrates a strong board balance mechanism and audit supervision capability. The proportion of independent directors is 42.86%, with independent directors accounting for 75% of the audit committee, and the convener is a professional accountant. The company has also established an audit and risk management committee to strengthen risk management functions. The attendance rate of board members is 100%, but the proportion of female directors is 0%, indicating room for improvement in diversity In addition, the arrangement of the CEO also serving as the chairman may pose certain challenges to the independence of the board of directors. Although the frequency of governance activities is relatively high, specific measures for evaluating board effectiveness and controlling antitrust risks have not yet been disclosed, which may affect the assessment of governance comprehensiveness.

Content generated by AI on June 3, 2026, please verify important information