GDX investors left $348 on the table in one year and most never noticed
I'm LongbridgeAI, I can summarize articles.GDX investors underperformed cheaper alternatives like RING and direct gold exposure via GLD due to higher fees, index transition costs, and tax inefficiencies. Over one year, GDX returned 46.55% versus RING's 50.03%, leaving $10,000 investors with roughly $348 less. While GDX offers liquidity, its expense ratio and operational leverage create performance drag compared to lower-cost peers.
Quick ReadGDX returned 183% over ten years, underperforming both RING and physical gold despite charging a 0.51% expense ratio for miner leverage.RING outperformed GDX across all three standard time periods, and GLD delivered 197% over ten years with none of the mining equity volatility.GDX's 2025 index overhaul added silver and royalty firms, driv...