---
type: "Topics"
locale: "en"
url: "https://longbridge.com/en/topics/42838720.md"
description: "$Alphabet - C(GOOG.US) Many people are mocking Google's 3.6 drop, a significant pullback. Compared to CC and GPT, it doesn't even rank, but have you considered that this is what should truly be done, from the perspective of Google's entire ecosystem? Or rather, if AI is to be fully implemented, it certainly won't rely on the coding market alone. If it were only about coding, that would be blowing a bubble."
datetime: "2026-07-21T22:24:32.000Z"
locales:
  - [en](https://longbridge.com/en/topics/42838720.md)
  - [zh-CN](https://longbridge.com/zh-CN/topics/42838720.md)
  - [zh-HK](https://longbridge.com/zh-HK/topics/42838720.md)
author: "[大雪雪的交易员](https://longbridge.com/en/profiles/13227469.md)"
---

# $Alphabet - C(GOOG.US) Many people are mocking Goo…


### Related Stocks

- [GOOG.US](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/GOOG.US.md)
- [GGLS.US](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/GGLS.US.md)
- [GGLL.US](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/GGLL.US.md)
- [GOOGL.US](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/GOOGL.US.md)
- [GOOGN.US](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/GOOGN.US.md)

## Comments (5)

- **ponypheonix · 2026-07-22T14:05:49.000Z**: The key point is that the cost for each task isn't cheap either. It's slightly cheaper than Kimi K3, but not as extremely affordable as DeepSeek or GPT_OSS. If you want to build a large ecosystem, shouldn't it at least be accessible and affordable for everyone?
- **爱理财的小Tom · 2026-07-21T23:44:42.000Z**: Coding is a very lucrative field.
- **Iwen · 2026-07-21T23:05:39.000Z**: Agreed, Google has no need to compete with GPT and Claude in coding; instead, it should leverage search and the Google ecosystem for differentiated competition.
