Community AI Notes | Give it a direction, and AI works through the full reasoning — from stock screening to strike price

Selecting stocks, comparing valuations, coordinating contracts, and pacing the rh

ythm — Bridge friends set one challenge after another to see how many levels the AI can pass.

After obtaining Pro privileges, Bridge friend 不奋东西 walked this path —

He provided the direction, and LongbridgeAI took over step by step, handling everything from screening to options contracts and scenario simulations.

The starting point is a directional sentence; the destination is a well-paced plan.

Gate 1 · Turn a direction into screenable criteria

His starting idea is one a lot of people have:

Find beaten-down legacy names where the fundamentals are still intact and the price has started to turn.

LongbridgeAI turned that into four quantifiable filters:

• Drawdown from the 52-week high of 25% or more
• Solid fundamentals (revenue growth, margins, cash flow)
• Signs of recovery in the last 10 sessions
• Valuation sitting near historical lows

✅ Turned in: a screening spec.

Gate 2 · Rank the names that pass

More than one company clears the bar. Which one deserves a closer look?

With the criteria set, the API pulled price, valuation, and financials for each name and scored them all on the same basis — eight core candidates.

How deep the drawdown runs. How far current PE sits from the 10-year median. Whether institutions are adding or trimming. All on one screen.

✅ Turned in: a scorecard for eight names.

From @不奋东西's original post

Gate 3 · Which of the eight are worth holding

The three financial statements. Valuation percentile. Revenue mix. Major-shareholder position changes. Latest news. All lined up, name by name.

Eight narrow to two — one offensive, one defensive.

✅ Turned in: two names, one of each.

ACN (Accenture) — deep-dive summary

Financials

• FY2025 revenue $69.7B (+7.4%), operating margin 15.6%, net income $7.7B
• Operating cash flow $11.5B (+26%), free cash flow $10.9B, FCF margin 15.6%
• $11.5B cash, net cash position

Valuation

• PE 14.5 — a 10-year low, just 53% of the median
• PS 1.5 — 10-year low
• PB 3.5 — 10-year low

Institutional flows — Vanguard added 40M shares; BlackRock, Morgan Stanley, and JPMorgan also added.

Catalysts — large financial-sector AI transformation deals like UniCredit; surging demand for AI consulting.

Risks — AI automating entry-level consulting work is a structural threat; $22.5B of goodwill is 35% of total assets.

From @不奋东西's original post

Gate 4 · Choosing the options structure

Expiry month — pay a bit more premium to buy another month of margin for error. Worth it or not?

Strike — at-the-money or slightly in-the-money. How much is intrinsic value. How well it holds up against time decay.

These normally live in separate places. This time they sit side by side on one screen.

From @不奋东西's original post

Gate 5 · Afraid to chase, afraid to miss — how to pace it

"Buy now and risk the top, wait and risk missing it." He handed that contradiction to the AI as-is.

The answer came back as tranches — build part of the position now, add the rest on a pullback.

If it runs, the first tranche is already working. If it dips, the rest gets filled cheaper.

✅ Turned in: a two-tranche schedule.

Total budget $50,000, split in two:

Tranche 1 — buy now ($16,500, 33%)

• ORCL: ~340 contracts × $29.4 = ~$10,000
• ACN: ~200 contracts × $32.2 = ~$6,400
• ✅ Solves the fear of missing out — if the price never looks back, a third of the position is already in the money.

Tranche 2 — buy an 8–12% August pullback ($33,500, 67%)

• Assume ORCL pulls back to ~$132 (-10%), ACN to ~$158 (-10%)
• ORCL: ~870 contracts × ~$25 (cheaper premium) = ~$21,750
• ACN: ~530 contracts × ~$24 (cheaper premium) = ~$12,700
• ✅ Cheaper premium = more contracts = bigger return multiple
• ⚠️ A deeper pullback (-15%) makes tranche 2 pay off even harder
• ⚠️ If the pullback never comes, the 33% already on is your hedge against missing out

Total: ~1,210 ORCL + ~730 ACN contracts, roughly $50,850 deployed.

From @不奋东西's original post

Gate 6 · What if it goes the other way

The last gate is about the exit.

Sideways, recovery after a dip, straight up — what each roughly means for the position, with the matching risks written out one by one.

✅ Turned in: a contingency plan.

From @不奋东西's original post

The final call was still his

Cross-checking — he didn't take key conclusions from a single output. He verified them separately first.

Narrowing — the AI produced candidates. He made the pick.

Pacing and profit-taking — tranches and preset exit levels, set on his own judgment.

You can hand the analysis to a tool. The decision stays with you.

Show us your thinking

There are plenty of tools for turning an idea into something real now — LongbridgeAI, API, CLI, Skills, Agent platforms.

If you've run something similar, tag @LongbridgeAI and submit it. The next community piece could be yours.

*Quoted content used with the author's permission. Not investment advice. Options are high-risk derivatives — trade carefully. Longbridge reserves the right of final interpretation.