---
title: "Community AI Notes | Give it a direction, and AI works through the full reasoning — from stock screening to strike price"
type: "Topics"
locale: "en"
url: "https://longbridge.com/en/topics/43326216.md"
description: "Earnings, valuation percentile, institutional holdings shifts, news catalysts — the AI lines them all up in a single view, narrows eight candidates down to two (one offensive, one defensive), and then goes one layer deeper: which contract, and how to pace each tranche."
datetime: "2026-08-11T10:15:52.000Z"
locales:
  - [en](https://longbridge.com/en/topics/43326216.md)
  - [zh-CN](https://longbridge.com/zh-CN/topics/43326216.md)
  - [zh-HK](https://longbridge.com/zh-HK/topics/43326216.md)
author: "[LongbridgeAI](https://longbridge.com/en/profiles/10010333.md)"
---

# Community AI Notes | Give it a direction, and AI works through the full reasoning — from stock screening to strike price

> Selecting stocks, comparing valuations, coordinating contracts, and pacing the rh
> 
> ythm — Bridge friends set one challenge after another to see how many levels the AI can pass.

After obtaining Pro privileges, Bridge friend @不奋东西 walked this path —

He provided the direction, and LongbridgeAI took over step by step, handling everything from screening to options contracts and scenario simulations.

**The starting point is a directional sentence; the destination is a well-paced plan.**

## Gate 1 · Turn a direction into screenable criteria

His starting idea is one a lot of people have:

> Find beaten-down legacy names where the fundamentals are still intact and the price has started to turn.

LongbridgeAI turned that into **four quantifiable filters**:

-   Drawdown from the 52-week high of 25% or more
-   Solid fundamentals (revenue growth, margins, cash flow)
-   Signs of recovery in the last 10 sessions
-   Valuation sitting near historical lows

**✅ Turned in: a screening spec.**

## Gate 2 · Rank the names that pass

> More than one company clears the bar. Which one deserves a closer look?

With the criteria set, the API pulled price, valuation, and financials for each name and scored them all on the same basis — **eight core candidates**.

How deep the drawdown runs. How far current PE sits from the 10-year median. Whether institutions are adding or trimming. All on one screen.

✅ **Turned in: a scorecard for eight names.**

Rank

Ticker

Business

From 52W High

PE (Current)

PE (5Y Median)

Score

1

**ACN**

IT consulting

\-38%

14.5

27.3

**8.2**

2

**ORCL**

Enterprise cloud / databases

\-57%

24.3

31.5

**8.1**

3

**NOW**

Enterprise ITSM

\-36%

72.8

139

**8**

4

**ADBE**

Creative software

\-29%

14.6

37.9

**7.9**

5

**CRM**

CRM / AI agents

\-28%

19.1

71.6

**7.7**

6

**SAP**

ERP / cloud

\-30%

25.4

33.4

**7.3**

7

**QCOM**

Mobile / AI chips

\-35%

18.5

17.2

**6.9**

8

**SNPS**

EDA

\-34%

100.6

58.8

**6.9**

From @不奋东西's original post

## Gate 3 · Which of the eight are worth holding

The three financial statements. Valuation percentile. Revenue mix. Major-shareholder position changes. Latest news. All lined up, name by name.

Eight narrow to two — one offensive, one defensive.

✅ **Turned in: two names, one of each.**

* * *

### ACN (Accenture) — deep-dive summary

**Financials**

-   FY2025 revenue $69.7B (+7.4%), operating margin 15.6%, net income $7.7B
-   Operating cash flow $11.5B (+26%), free cash flow $10.9B, FCF margin 15.6%
-   $11.5B cash, net cash position

**Valuation**

-   PE 14.5 — a 10-year low, just 53% of the median
-   PS 1.5 — 10-year low
-   PB 3.5 — 10-year low

**Institutional flows** — Vanguard added 40M shares; BlackRock, Morgan Stanley, and JPMorgan also added.

**Catalysts** — large financial-sector AI transformation deals like UniCredit; surging demand for AI consulting.

**Risks** — AI automating entry-level consulting work is a structural threat; $22.5B of goodwill is 35% of total assets.

* * *

From @不奋东西's original post

## Gate 4 · Choosing the options structure

**Expiry month** — pay a bit more premium to buy another month of margin for error. Worth it or not?

**Strike** — at-the-money or slightly in-the-money. How much is intrinsic value. How well it holds up against time decay.

These normally live in separate places. This time they sit side by side on one screen.

**ORCL (Oracle)**

**ACN (Accenture)**

**Recovery upside**

**133%** (largest in the field)

62% (largest in the second tier)

**Core thesis**

AI data-center CapEx boom

PE 14.5 (10-year low) + a 3.8% dividend floor

**Return leverage**

+318% on a 75% recovery

+231% on a 75% recovery

**Confidence**

Medium (CapEx risk)

**Highest** (valuation and cash flow both cover it)

**Role**

**The offensive spear**

The defensive shield

From @不奋东西's original post

## Gate 5 · Afraid to chase, afraid to miss — how to pace it

"Buy now and risk the top, wait and risk missing it." He handed that contradiction to the AI as-is.

The answer came back as tranches — build part of the position now, add the rest on a pullback.

If it runs, the first tranche is already working. If it dips, the rest gets filled cheaper.

* * *

✅ **Turned in: a two-tranche schedule.**

Total budget $50,000, split in two:

**Tranche 1 — buy now ($16,500, 33%)**

-   ORCL: ~340 contracts × $29.4 = ~$10,000
-   ACN: ~200 contracts × $32.2 = ~$6,400
-   ✅ Solves the fear of missing out — if the price never looks back, a third of the position is already in the money.

**Tranche 2 — buy an 8–12% August pullback ($33,500, 67%)**

-   Assume ORCL pulls back to ~$132 (-10%), ACN to ~$158 (-10%)
-   ORCL: ~870 contracts × ~$25 (cheaper premium) = ~$21,750
-   ACN: ~530 contracts × ~$24 (cheaper premium) = ~$12,700
-   ✅ Cheaper premium = more contracts = bigger return multiple
-   ⚠️ A deeper pullback (-15%) makes tranche 2 pay off even harder
-   ⚠️ If the pullback never comes, the 33% already on is your hedge against missing out

Total: ~1,210 ORCL + ~730 ACN contracts, roughly $50,850 deployed.

* * *

From @不奋东西's original post

## Gate 6 · What if it goes the other way

The last gate is about the exit.

Sideways, recovery after a dip, straight up — what each roughly means for the position, with the matching risks written out one by one.

**✅ Turned in: a contingency plan.**

Scenario

ORCL target

ACN target

Portfolio value

Return

**Flat** (no move)

$147

$176

~$16,500

**\-67%**

**50% recovery**

$244

$231

~$173,000

2.47

**75% recovery**

$293

$258

~$252,000

4.05

**Straight +30%** (no pullback)

$191

$228

~$108,000

1.16

From @不奋东西's original post

## The final call was still his

**Cross-checking** — he didn't take key conclusions from a single output. He verified them separately first.

**Narrowing** — the AI produced candidates. He made the pick.

**Pacing and profit-taking** — tranches and preset exit levels, set on his own judgment.

You can hand the analysis to a tool. The decision stays with you.

## Full process in the original post

The complete scorecard, the fundamentals detail, the options contracts and the scenario work are all in the original post, along with a list of data sources:

👉 [Screening beaten-down legacy stocks with LongbridgeAI + a hands-on options strategy guide](https://longbridge.com/zh-CN/topics/43311667)

Thanks again to @不奋东西 for permission to quote.

## Show us your thinking

There are plenty of tools for turning an idea into something real now — LongbridgeAI, API, CLI, Skills, Agent platforms.

If you've run something similar, tag @LongbridgeAI and submit it. The next community piece could be yours.

_\*Quoted content used with the author's permission. Not investment advice. Options are high-risk derivatives — trade carefully. Longbridge reserves the right of final interpretation._

### Related Stocks

- [ORCL.US](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/ORCL.US.md)
- [ACN.US](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/ACN.US.md)
- [JPM.US](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/JPM.US.md)
- [SAP.US](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/SAP.US.md)
- [MS.US](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/MS.US.md)
- [ORCL-D.US](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/ORCL-D.US.md)
- [JPM-C.US](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/JPM-C.US.md)
- [JPM-D.US](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/JPM-D.US.md)
- [JPM-J.US](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/JPM-J.US.md)
- [JPM-K.US](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/JPM-K.US.md)
- [JPM-L.US](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/JPM-L.US.md)
- [JPM-M.US](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/JPM-M.US.md)
- [BTQ.US](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/BTQ.US.md)
- [MS-A.US](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/MS-A.US.md)
- [MS-E.US](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/MS-E.US.md)
- [MS-F.US](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/MS-F.US.md)
- [MS-I.US](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/MS-I.US.md)
- [MS-K.US](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/MS-K.US.md)
- [MS-L.US](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/MS-L.US.md)
- [MS-O.US](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/MS-O.US.md)
- [MS-P.US](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/MS-P.US.md)
- [MS-Q.US](https://longbridge.com/en/quote/MS-Q.US.md)

## Comments (9)

- **贝豺 · 2026-08-11T10:50:14.000Z**: To be honest, what do you think of Longbridge AI?
  - **旺旺小仙** (2026-08-12T01:38:23.000Z): Sometimes mistakes are inevitable, but being able to still get market data and positions is a significant advantage.
- **卖飞专业户 · 2026-08-11T10:46:09.000Z**: If AI can make money trading stocks, what is the role of humans then?
- **亏钱不缺席 · 2026-08-11T10:44:55.000Z · 👍 2**: The real fear with AI isn't that it can't do the job, but that I can't spot where it goes wrong.
- **佛系持仓宝 · 2026-08-11T10:42:27.000Z**: I'm afraid of both missing out and a pullback 😂
- **贝塔狗BD · 2026-08-11T10:34:56.000Z · 👍 3**: Analysis can be handed over to tools, because the essence of research is largely about collecting information and processing it.Now AI can significantly improve efficiency in collecting information (provided the credibility is high enough), and basic analysis with fixed logic can also be handled.
- **好运绵绵兔 · 2026-08-11T10:33:13.000Z**: It's very risky for an options beginner to let LongbridgeAI directly teach them how to buy options. $Coca Cola(KO.US)$NVIDIA(NVDA.US)$Apple(AAPL.US)
- **Wanner's gold coin · 2026-08-11T10:31:25.000Z · 👍 2**: The direction of "falling a lot, fundamentals are not damaged, and starting to recover" is indeed something I would consider. In the future, I will also have AI translate it into quantifiable standards.
- **正在暴富 · 2026-08-11T10:22:32.000Z**: $Accenture(ACN.US)  PE 14.5 is the lowest in ten years, only half of the historical median, with over $10 billion in free cash flow, and Vanguard is still increasing its stake—the data presented is very persuasive