<p>作者：Daniel Wiessner</p>
<p>2 月 28 日（路透社）——特朗普政府周五采取行动，试图恢复拜登时代美国劳工部的一项规定，该规定将强制加班工资扩展至 400 万名薪资员工，但已被两名法官驳回。</p>
<p>劳工部在德克萨斯州卢博克的联邦法院对美国地区法官萨姆·卡明斯在 12 月的裁决提出上诉，该裁决认为该规则不当将加班工资的资格基于员工的薪资而非其工作职责。此案由一家小型营销公司 Flint Avenue 提起。</p>
<p>预计特朗普政府将重新审视并可能废除 2024 年的规则，该规则遭到商业团体和许多共和党的反对。但上诉该裁决使劳工部能够捍卫其设定加班工资资格薪资门槛的能力，这一做法自 1930 年代以来一直在共和党和民主党政府中实施。</p>
<p>为该规则辩护的美国司法部没有立即回应评论请求。</p>
<p>新公民自由联盟的盛利表示，该组织在劳工部对德克萨斯州去年的诉讼早期败诉后，预计会提出上诉。</p>
<p>该上诉将由位于新奥尔良的美国第五巡回上诉法院审理，该法院在去年九月的一起独立案件中裁定，劳工部可以将员工的薪资作为其职责的代理。联邦工资法将 “行政、管理或专业” 职责的员工排除在加班工资之外。</p>
<p>该案件涉及对 2019 年在特朗普总统第一任期内通过的一项规则的挑战，该规则将薪资门槛提高至约 35,500 美元。该规则取代了奥巴马时代的一项规定，该规定将门槛提高至 47,500 美元，但在法庭上被驳回。</p>
<p>Flint Avenue 案件的主要问题将是 2024 年的规则是否将薪资门槛提高至约 58,600 美元，超出了合理范围。</p>
<p>这是 Flint Avenue、德克萨斯州及多个商业团体在一项独立诉讼中的主张。德克萨斯州谢尔曼的美国地区法官肖恩·乔丹在 11 月同意了该州的诉讼，并永久驳回了该规则。卡明斯随后也做出了类似的裁决，引用了乔丹的决定。</p>
<p>在民主党前总统乔·拜登的政府下，劳工部于 11 月向第五巡回法院上诉乔丹的裁决。本周早些时候，该机构请求更多时间提交该案件的开案陈述，理由是 “由于最近的政府更迭”。</p>
<p>该案件为 Flint Avenue 诉美国劳工部，德克萨斯北区美国地区法院，案号 5:24-cv-00130。</p>
<p>Flint Avenue 的代表：新公民自由联盟的盛利和约翰·维基奥内；以及凯伦·库克</p>
<p>劳工部的代表：美国司法部的布赖恩·罗森 - 肖德</p>
<p>阅读更多：</p>
<p>另一名法官阻止拜登扩展加班工资的规则</p>
<p>美国法官驳回拜登的加班工资规则</p>
<p>法官不会阻止拜登在营销公司的诉讼中实施加班工资规则</p>
<p>美国劳工部的繁重议程包括承包商、工作签证、极端高温</p>
<p>德克萨斯州赢得法院对拜登加班工资规则的阻止</p>
<p>德克萨斯州和保守团体对拜登的加班工资规则提起诉讼</p>
<p>拜登的加班工资规则遭到美国商业团体的挑战</p>
<p>拜登的规则为 400 万美国工人提供加班工资</p>
<p>特朗普政府提议扩展加班工资</p>
<p>美国劳工部可以根据薪资确定加班工资资格，法院裁定</p>

特朗普媒体科技集团

<p>特朗普政府已对一项裁决提出上诉，该裁决阻止了一项拜登时代的加班工资规定，旨在将强制加班扩展至 400 万名薪资员工。此次上诉是针对萨姆·卡明斯法官在 12 月作出的裁决，该裁决指出该规则不当将加班资格基于薪资而非工作职责。此案由弗林特大道发起，挑战 2024 年提高加班薪资门槛至约 58,600 美元的规则。上诉将由美国第五巡回上诉法院审理，该法院此前裁定薪资可以作为工作职责的代理指标</p>

<p>By Daniel Wiessner</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>作者：Daniel Wiessner</p>
</div><p>Feb 28 (Reuters) - The Trump administration on Friday moved to revive a Biden-era U.S. Department of Labor regulation that would have extended mandatory overtime pay to 4 million salaried workers but has been struck down by two judges.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>2 月 28 日（路透社）——特朗普政府周五采取行动，试图恢复拜登时代美国劳工部的一项规定，该规定将强制加班工资扩展至 400 万名薪资员工，但已被两名法官驳回。</p>
</div><p>The Labor Department filed a notice of appeal in Lubbock, Texas, federal court of U.S. District Judge Sam Cummings’ December ruling that said the rule improperly based eligibility for overtime pay on workers’ salaries rather than their job duties. The case was brought by Flint Avenue, a small marketing firm.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>劳工部在德克萨斯州卢博克的联邦法院对美国地区法官萨姆·卡明斯在 12 月的裁决提出上诉，该裁决认为该规则不当将加班工资的资格基于员工的薪资而非其工作职责。此案由一家小型营销公司 Flint Avenue 提起。</p>
</div><p>The Trump administration is expected to revisit and possibly scrap the 2024 rule, which was opposed by business groups and many Republicans. But appealing the decision allows the Labor Department to defend its ability to set a salary threshold for overtime eligibility, which it has done since the 1930s through Republican and Democratic administrations.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>预计特朗普政府将重新审视并可能废除 2024 年的规则，该规则遭到商业团体和许多共和党的反对。但上诉该裁决使劳工部能够捍卫其设定加班工资资格薪资门槛的能力，这一做法自 1930 年代以来一直在共和党和民主党政府中实施。</p>
</div><p>The U.S. Department of Justice, which is defending the rule, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>为该规则辩护的美国司法部没有立即回应评论请求。</p>
</div><p>Sheng Li of the New Civil Liberties Alliance, which represents Flint Avenue, said the group expected the appeal after the Labor Department appealed an earlier loss in a lawsuit by Texas last year.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>新公民自由联盟的盛利表示，该组织在劳工部对德克萨斯州去年的诉讼早期败诉后，预计会提出上诉。</p>
</div><p>The appeal will be heard by the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which ruled last September in a separate case that the Labor Department can use workers’ salaries as a proxy for their duties. Federal wage law exempts workers with “executive, administrative, or professional” duties from overtime pay.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>该上诉将由位于新奥尔良的美国第五巡回上诉法院审理，该法院在去年九月的一起独立案件中裁定，劳工部可以将员工的薪资作为其职责的代理。联邦工资法将 “行政、管理或专业” 职责的员工排除在加班工资之外。</p>
</div><p>That case involved a challenge to a rule adopted in 2019 during President Donald Trump’s first term that raised the salary threshold to about $35,500. That rule replaced an Obama-era regulation raising the threshold to $47,500 that was struck down in court.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>该案件涉及对 2019 年在特朗普总统第一任期内通过的一项规则的挑战，该规则将薪资门槛提高至约 35,500 美元。该规则取代了奥巴马时代的一项规定，该规定将门槛提高至 47,500 美元，但在法庭上被驳回。</p>
</div><p>The main question in Flint Avenue’s case will be whether the 2024 rule, which raised the salary threshold to about $58,600, went too far.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Flint Avenue 案件的主要问题将是 2024 年的规则是否将薪资门槛提高至约 58,600 美元，超出了合理范围。</p>
</div><p>That was the claim by Flint, as well as Texas and several business groups in a separate lawsuit. U.S. District Judge Sean Jordan in Sherman, Texas, agreed in November in the state’s lawsuit and permanently struck down the rule. Cummings followed suit, citing Jordan’s decision in a brief order.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>这是 Flint Avenue、德克萨斯州及多个商业团体在一项独立诉讼中的主张。德克萨斯州谢尔曼的美国地区法官肖恩·乔丹在 11 月同意了该州的诉讼，并永久驳回了该规则。卡明斯随后也做出了类似的裁决，引用了乔丹的决定。</p>
</div><p>The Labor Department under the administration of Democratic former President Joe Biden appealed Jordan’s decision to the 5th Circuit in November. Earlier this week, the agency asked for more time to file an opening brief in that case “due to the recent change in administration.”</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在民主党前总统乔·拜登的政府下，劳工部于 11 月向第五巡回法院上诉乔丹的裁决。本周早些时候，该机构请求更多时间提交该案件的开案陈述，理由是 “由于最近的政府更迭”。</p>
</div><p>The case is Flint Avenue v. U.S. Department of Labor, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, No. 5:24-cv-00130.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>该案件为 Flint Avenue 诉美国劳工部，德克萨斯北区美国地区法院，案号 5:24-cv-00130。</p>
</div><p>For Flint Avenue: Sheng Li and John Vecchione of the New Civil Liberties Alliance; and Karen Cook</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Flint Avenue 的代表：新公民自由联盟的盛利和约翰·维基奥内；以及凯伦·库克</p>
</div><p>For the Department of Labor: Brian Rosen-Shaud of the U.S. Department of Justice</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>劳工部的代表：美国司法部的布赖恩·罗森 - 肖德</p>
</div><p>Read more:</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>阅读更多：</p>
</div><p>Another judge blocks Biden rule expanding overtime pay</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>另一名法官阻止拜登扩展加班工资的规则</p>
</div><p>US judge strikes down Biden overtime pay rule</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>美国法官驳回拜登的加班工资规则</p>
</div><p>Judge won’t block Biden overtime pay rule in marketing firm’s lawsuit</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>法官不会阻止拜登在营销公司的诉讼中实施加班工资规则</p>
</div><p>US Labor Department’s loaded agenda includes contractors, work visas, extreme heat</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>美国劳工部的繁重议程包括承包商、工作签证、极端高温</p>
</div><p>Texas wins court block on Biden overtime pay rule</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>德克萨斯州赢得法院对拜登加班工资规则的阻止</p>
</div><p>Texas, conservative group sue over Biden overtime pay rule</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>德克萨斯州和保守团体对拜登的加班工资规则提起诉讼</p>
</div><p>Biden overtime pay rule challenged by US business groups</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>拜登的加班工资规则遭到美国商业团体的挑战</p>
</div><p>Biden rule grants overtime pay to 4 million US workers</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>拜登的规则为 400 万美国工人提供加班工资</p>
</div><p>Trump administration proposes overtime pay expansion</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>特朗普政府提议扩展加班工资</p>
</div><p>US Labor Department can base OT pay eligibility on salaries, appeals court rules</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>美国劳工部可以根据薪资确定加班工资资格，法院裁定</p>
</div>

Trump Labor Department appeals ruling that blocked Biden overtime pay rule

- 特朗普政府计划恢复拜登时代的加班工资规定，影响 400 万工人。  
- 劳工部对德克萨斯州法官裁决提出上诉，争议薪资与工作职责的关系。  
- 该案将由新奥尔良第五巡回上诉法院审理，涉及薪资门槛的合法性。  

特朗普政府的劳工部对阻止拜登加班费规则的裁决提出上诉