<div id="readability-page-1">Sunnyvale California, United States - September 24, 2021: Headquarters of 23andMe, a personal genomics and biotechnology company headquartered in Mountain View, California that provides rapid genetic testing. getty Imagine opening a birthday gift DNA kit and discovering you're entitled to millions you never knew existed. For Carmen Thomas and hundreds of Americans like her, this isn't fantasy—it's reality. Consumer DNA tests have evolved from novelty gifts into powerful legal tools that are dismantling decades-old estate plans and forcing courts to redefine &#34;family.&#34;  For estate planners and families with significant assets, the message is clear: traditional estate planning no longer accounts for genetic testing realities.  Direct-to-consumer genetic testing through 23andMe, Ancestry and similar services has made it remarkably easy to identify biological parents, half-siblings and extended relatives who were previously unknown—or intentionally concealed. These discoveries frequently collide with estates where wealth has already been distributed, creating conflicts between biology, family narratives and legal intent.  The Massachusetts Medical Malpractice Case: Carmen Thomas used a consumer DNA test to discover two half-sisters, then filed suit seeking a portion of roughly $28 million tied to their late father's medical malpractice award. Her case is emerging as a touchstone for how U.S. judges weigh late-discovered heirs against existing estate structures.  The Colorado Cabin Dispute: A man excluded from his father's estate established biological paternity through DNA evidence and secured his rightful share—including a valuable family cabin—under state intestacy law.  MORE FOR YOU The Australian Estate Reopening: In New South Wales, a man used DNA evidence to prove biological paternity to a deceased testator whose AU$1.5 million estate had already been distributed. The court accepted the genetic proof, reopened the finished estate, and awarded him an equal share.  The lesson: Once paternity is legally proven, many states treat a previously unacknowledged child identically to any other child for inheritance purposes when there's no valid will stating otherwise—even reopening closed estates.  If someone dies without a will or trust, a late-discovered child who can prove paternity through DNA testing may step into the statutory line of succession—regardless of whether the decedent knew of that child's existence.  A DNA match creates a powerful equitable narrative but doesn't guarantee inheritance rights if a valid will or trust clearly favors other individuals. Courts typically prioritize documented intent over biology when governing documents are explicit.  Courts usually require testing from accredited laboratories with chain-of-custody documentation and expert testimony before accepting paternity in probate proceedings. A 23andMe report alone won't win—or defeat—a claim.  Statutes increasingly address children conceived with stored gametes or embryos, often requiring written consent and strict timelines for inheritance rights to vest. Consumer DNA makes these relationships easier to identify but doesn't replace statutory requirements.  Identify beneficiaries individually rather than relying solely on broad class terms like &#34;children,&#34; &#34;issue,&#34; or &#34;descendants.&#34; Clear naming reduces arguments that a surprise heir was &#34;meant&#34; to be included.  When class terms are necessary, add explicit definitions stating whether they include:  Some estate planners now recommend language clarifying that only specifically named individuals—or those known and acknowledged during the client's lifetime—are intended beneficiaries, even if additional biological relatives are later identified.  Regular reviews should explicitly include material DNA discoveries as a reason to revisit your plan, alongside traditional triggers like marriage, divorce, birth of children, or major health events.  Retirement accounts, life insurance, and transfer-on-death registrations pass outside your will but can still be challenged by new heirs. Keep these designations consistent with your overall plan.  Family meetings and transparent communication significantly lower the emotional temperature when surprises occur—and beneficiaries are far less likely to file lawsuits when they don't feel blindsided.  Estate planning in 2025 means combining traditional tools with contemporary awareness:  The genie is out of the bottle. DNA testing is becoming cheaper, more accurate, and more ubiquitous every year. The families that will weather this shift best are those who plan proactively.  By acknowledging that biological relationships can now be proven with near-certainty, and by drafting estate documents that account for this reality, you can ensure your legacy passes according to your wishes, not a laboratory's findings.  If your estate plan was created before the DNA testing era—or hasn't been updated to account for these new realities—now is the time to revisit it with qualified legal counsel. Because in 2025, a $99 DNA kit can rewrite a million-dollar estate plan.  Can a DNA test override a will? DNA establishes biological relationships, but a valid will expressing clear intent typically controls distribution. However, with no will (intestacy), DNA-proven heirs have strong statutory rights in most states.  How accurate is consumer DNA testing for legal purposes? Consumer tests provide strong leads, but courts usually require confirmation from accredited forensic laboratories with proper chain-of-custody documentation and expert testimony.  Can I explicitly exclude unknown biological children in my will? In many jurisdictions, yes—but the language must be carefully crafted with local law in mind. Consult an experienced estate planning attorney to ensure such provisions will be enforceable.  What happens if a DNA heir appears after the estate is closed? Depending on jurisdiction, courts may reopen estates. Time limits and procedural requirements vary significantly by state and country.</div>

<p>消费者 DNA 测试，如 23andMe 提供的测试，正在通过揭示以前未知的继承人来重塑遗产规划，从而导致遗产分配中的法律挑战。美国和澳大利亚的案例突显了 DNA 证据如何改变继承权，甚至重新开启已关闭的遗产。遗产规划师现在建议更新规划，以考虑潜在的 DNA 发现，确保受益人指定明确。随着 DNA 测试变得更加普及，将这些考虑因素纳入遗产规划至关重要，以防止法律争议并确保意图的遗产分配</p>

DNA 测试与遗产规划：23andMe 如何引发 2800 万美元的 DNA 意外发现