<p>如果你注意到电动车的热潮周期最近并没有特别引人注目，你并不孤单。随着电动车税收抵免的逐渐消退，各品牌的计划也有所收缩，电池工厂的投资看起来没有最初预期的那么丰厚。相反，他们正在翻阅旧的剧本。</p>
<p>汽车制造商再次预计到本世纪末将在自动驾驶能力上取得重大进展。但他们能实现吗？</p>
<h3>将关键材料送入你的收件箱。</h3>
<h2>在这里注册，获取我们关于未来出行的必读简报。</h2>
<p>欢迎回到 关键材料，这是你每日获取汽车领域电动和科技相关信息的汇总。此外：燃油经济性回退并不意味着消费者整体上会省钱，沃尔沃仍然押注美国市场适合电气化。让我们开始吧。</p>
<h2>25%：汽车制造商全力以赴推进自动驾驶</h2>
<p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://cdn.motor1.com/images/static/16x9-tr.png?x-oss-process=image/auto-orient,1/interlace,1/resize,w_1440,h_1440/quality,q_95/format,jpg" alt="比亚迪神目自动驾驶功能" width="16" height="9" original-src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://cdn.motor1.com/images/static/16x9-tr.png"/></p>
<p>照片来源：比亚迪</p>
<p>经过多年的虚假开端和失败，出行行业再次对自动驾驶汽车充满热情。一些汽车制造商，如特斯拉，从未放弃这个梦想。其他一些公司在过去几年中退缩，因为无驾驶技术看起来成本过高且耗时。福特和大众关闭了 Argo AI，通用汽车也解散了 Cruise。</p>
<p>现在，车辆自动驾驶再次成为焦点，并且发展速度比以往更快。以下是来自 TechCrunch 的上周发展列表，生动地展示了这一进程：</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Waymo 开始在费城测试其自动驾驶车辆（配备安全监控员），并将在巴尔的摩、圣路易斯和匹兹堡开始手动驾驶以收集数据；Uber 和 Avride 在达拉斯推出了一项机器人出租车服务，最初将包括一名人类安全操作员在驾驶座上；加州机动车辆管理局发布了修订后的规则，允许公司在该州的公共高速公路上测试并最终部署自动驾驶卡车。</p>
</blockquote>
<p>不过，这不仅仅是关于机器人出租车和无人驾驶卡车。汽车公司也在更积极地进入这一领域。本周，Rivian 计划在其自动驾驶和人工智能日上展示自己的高科技路线图，我们将参加此次活动。Rivian 首席执行官 RJ Scaringe 在最近接受的 Automotive News&#34;Shift&#34;播客采访中对公司的愿景进行了宣传。</p>
<p>他表示，尽管机器人出租车获得了最多关注，但个人拥有的自动驾驶车辆在汽车行业中将是&#34;非常强大的&#34;。他指出，美国道路上 99% 的行驶里程都是由个人车辆完成的。</p>
<p>&#34;未来几年将与过去几年截然不同，&#34;Scaringe 说。&#34;不仅对 Rivian 而言，对整个汽车行业而言也是如此。&#34;</p>
<p>通用汽车、福特、Lucid 以及几乎所有品牌都在酝酿自己的自动驾驶系统。显然，这项技术正在快速推进，力求成为主流。</p>
<p>关键问题是品牌是否能够在确保安全的同时快速推出这些功能。自动驾驶车辆事故仍然非常引人注目，这意味着它们很容易引起媒体和监管机构的关注。这几乎没有容错空间，也需要避免旧的软件开发理念&#34;快速行动，打破常规。&#34;</p>
<h2>50%：额外 1000 亿加仑汽油</h2>
<p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://cdn.motor1.com/images/static/16x9-tr.png?x-oss-process=image/auto-orient,1/interlace,1/resize,w_1440,h_1440/quality,q_95/format,jpg" width="16" height="9" original-src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://cdn.motor1.com/images/static/16x9-tr.png"/></p>
<p>照片来源：InsideEVs</p>
<p>特朗普政府将其燃油经济性回退宣传为对汽车买家的馈赠。毕竟，消费者正在追求更便宜的汽车，尤其是在新车的平均交易价格徘徊在 50,000 美元左右。</p>
<p>虽然降低车辆标准_可能_会使前期车辆成本更便宜，但从长远来看并不一定能为美国人节省钱。这是根据分析师以及政府对规则变更的自身分析得出的结论。</p>
<p>路透社 解释道：</p>
<blockquote>
<p>因此，汽车制造商到 2031 年将节省 350 亿美元，假设汽车制造商将节省转嫁给消费者，平均前期车辆成本将下降约 930 美元，根据 国家公路交通安全管理局 的经济分析支持该提案。</p>
<p>但 NHTSA 的同一经济分析还表示，该提案将使燃油消耗到 2050 年增加约 1000 亿加仑，相较于拜登标准，可能使美国人损失高达 1850 亿美元。</p>
</blockquote>
<p>批评者还认为，汽油需求的增加可能会推高燃料成本。这——完全忽视了效率较低的动力系统的潜力——可能会轻易抵消通过降低燃油经济性标准所带来的成本节省。</p>
<p>更多来自_路透社_：</p>
<blockquote>
<p>&#34;交通部现在估计技术成本的前期节省更大，但他们也估计燃油节省的损失更大，&#34;纽约大学政策完整性研究所的法律主任杰森·施瓦茨说。</p>
<p>&#34;至于任何前期节省在加油时花费更多钱的情况下会消失得多快，确实会非常快，&#34;他说。</p>
</blockquote>
<p>此外，根据 NHTSA 的数据，降低的每加仑英里数标准还将使碳排放增加约 5%。</p>
<p>所以，是的，这一举措可能会使汽车制造商在长期内节省数百万甚至数十亿美元。但消费者呢？他们可能会被留在一旁。</p>
<h2>75%：沃尔沃相信美国仍然想要电动车</h2>
<p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://cdn.motor1.com/images/static/16x9-tr.png?x-oss-process=image/auto-orient,1/interlace,1/resize,w_1440,h_1440/quality,q_95/format,jpg" alt="2026 沃尔沃 EX30" width="16" height="9" original-src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://cdn.motor1.com/images/static/16x9-tr.png"/></p>
<p>照片来源：Kevin Williams/InsideEVs</p>
<p>沃尔沃经历了不平凡的一年。这并不是有趣的那种。从软件问题到关税麻烦，这家瑞典汽车制造商遭遇了一系列的厄运和 “发现” 阶段的冲击。</p>
<p>尽管面临困难，回归的首席执行官 Håkan Samuelsson 仍然相信电气化。不仅如此，他还认为美国——虽然不再有联邦电动车激励措施——仍然想要与燃油车分手。</p>
<p>以下是 Samuelsson 在接受 汽车新闻 采访时所说的话：</p>
<blockquote>
<p>&#34;没有激励措施会很困难，但另一方面，你应该谨慎地相信市场会回归燃油车。为什么？因为人们低估了全电动车和长续航插电式混合动力车的一个重要优势，那就是你可以每天早上都把车库里的车充满电。</p>
<p>使用长续航插电式混合动力车，你可以在电动模式下行驶最多 200 公里，约合 125 英里。你在一天中很少需要超过这个续航，这意味着驾驶体验与全电动车非常相似。备用发动机很少会启动。</p>
<p>此外，我认为电气化在美国是一个有效的解决方案，因为很多人有在家充电的可能性。因此，我认为在许多方面，美国是电气化的理想市场。&#34;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>现在，你可能注意到了 Samuelsson 提到的一个点：插电式混合动力车。</p>
<p>具体来说，他似乎在押注美国可能不会完全投入电池电动车，但至少会通过购买大量插电式混合动力车来与行业妥协。这是沃尔沃认为自己可以毫无问题地实现的目标。</p>
<h2>100%：你会选择插电式混合动力车还是增程电动车？</h2>
<p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://cdn.motor1.com/images/static/16x9-tr.png?x-oss-process=image/auto-orient,1/interlace,1/resize,w_1440,h_1440/quality,q_95/format,jpg" alt="Scout Traveler 2025 洛杉矶车展" width="16" height="9" original-src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://cdn.motor1.com/images/static/16x9-tr.png"/></p>
<p>照片来源：Scout Motors</p>
<p>插电式混合动力车和增程电动车目前正受到广泛关注。如果传统电动车明天消失，你会更倾向于购买插电式混合动力车还是增程电动车？</p>
<p>我们想听听你的意见！</p>
<p>你希望在 Insideevs.com 上看到什么？</p>
<p>参加我们的 3 分钟调查。</p>
<p>- InsideEVs 团队</p>
<p>分享这个故事</p>
<ul>
<li>Facebook</li>
<li>X</li>
<li>LinkedIn</li>
<li>Flipboard</li>
<li>Reddit</li>
<li>WhatsApp</li>
<li>电子邮件</li>
</ul>
<p>前往评论区</p>
<p>(</p>
<p>)</p>
<p>有线索要告诉我们吗？邮箱：tips@insideevs.com</p>
<p>查看所有评论 ()</p>

沃尔沃(ADR)

RIVN

<p>汽车行业正重新关注自动驾驶汽车，Waymo、Uber 和 Rivian 等公司正在快速推进。尽管特朗普的燃油经济性回退承诺将带来更便宜的汽车，但分析师警告称，由于燃油消耗增加，长期成本将上升。沃尔沃继续推动美国市场的电气化，尽管面临挑战，仍对其潜力抱有信心。行业面临的挑战是如何在快速技术部署与安全问题之间取得平衡，因为自动驾驶汽车事故仍然备受关注</p>

<p>If you've noticed that the EV hype cycle hasn't exactly been front-and-center lately, you're not alone. Brands have dialed their plans down a notch as the EV tax credit fades out and investments in battery plants look less fruitful than originally expected. Instead, they're dusting off an old playbook.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>如果你注意到电动车的热潮周期最近并没有特别引人注目，你并不孤单。随着电动车税收抵免的逐渐消退，各品牌的计划也有所收缩，电池工厂的投资看起来没有最初预期的那么丰厚。相反，他们正在翻阅旧的剧本。</p>
</div><p>Once again, automakers are expecting big strides in autonomous capability by the end of the decade. But will they deliver?</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>汽车制造商再次预计到本世纪末将在自动驾驶能力上取得重大进展。但他们能实现吗？</p>
</div><h3>GET CRITICAL MATERIALS IN YOUR INBOX.</h3>
<div class="lb-trans"><h3>将关键材料送入你的收件箱。</h3>
</div><h2>Sign up here for our must-read briefing on the future of mobility.</h2>
<div class="lb-trans"><h2>在这里注册，获取我们关于未来出行的必读简报。</h2>
</div><p>Welcome back to Critical Materials, your daily roundup for all things electric and tech in the automotive space. Also on deck: The fuel economy rollback doesn't mean consumers will save money overall, and Volvo is still betting that the U.S. is rich for electrification.Let's jump in.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>欢迎回到 关键材料，这是你每日获取汽车领域电动和科技相关信息的汇总。此外：燃油经济性回退并不意味着消费者整体上会省钱，沃尔沃仍然押注美国市场适合电气化。让我们开始吧。</p>
</div><h2>25%: Automakers Are Going Full-Tilt On Autonomy</h2>
<div class="lb-trans"><h2>25%：汽车制造商全力以赴推进自动驾驶</h2>
</div><p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://cdn.motor1.com/images/static/16x9-tr.png" alt="BYD God's Eye Autonomy Features" original-src="https://cdn.motor1.com/images/static/16x9-tr.png"/></p>
<p>Photo by: BYD</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>照片来源：比亚迪</p>
</div><p>After years of false starts and face plants, the mobility industry is gung-ho on self-driving cars again. Some automakers, like Tesla, never gave up on the dream. Others took a step back in the last few years, as driverless technology started looking too costly and time consuming. Ford and VW shut down Argo AI, and General Motors folded up Cruise.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>经过多年的虚假开端和失败，出行行业再次对自动驾驶汽车充满热情。一些汽车制造商，如特斯拉，从未放弃这个梦想。其他一些公司在过去几年中退缩，因为无驾驶技术看起来成本过高且耗时。福特和大众关闭了 Argo AI，通用汽车也解散了 Cruise。</p>
</div><p>Now vehicle autonomy is front and center once more—and moving faster than ever. This list of developments from about the last week, via TechCrunch, illustrates that pace nicely:</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>现在，车辆自动驾驶再次成为焦点，并且发展速度比以往更快。以下是来自 TechCrunch 的上周发展列表，生动地展示了这一进程：</p>
</div><blockquote>
<p>Waymo started testing its autonomous vehicles (with a safety monitor) in Philadelphia and will start manual driving to collect data in Baltimore, St. Louis, and Pittsburgh; Uber and Avride launched a robotaxi service in Dallas that will initially include a human safety operator behind the wheel; and the California Department of Motor Vehicles released revised rules that would allow companies to test and eventually deploy self-driving trucks on public highways in the state.</p>
</blockquote>
<div class="lb-trans"><blockquote>
<p>Waymo 开始在费城测试其自动驾驶车辆（配备安全监控员），并将在巴尔的摩、圣路易斯和匹兹堡开始手动驾驶以收集数据；Uber 和 Avride 在达拉斯推出了一项机器人出租车服务，最初将包括一名人类安全操作员在驾驶座上；加州机动车辆管理局发布了修订后的规则，允许公司在该州的公共高速公路上测试并最终部署自动驾驶卡车。</p>
</blockquote>
</div><p>It's not just about robotaxis and driverless trucks, though. Car companies are diving into the space more aggressively too. This week, Rivian plans to lay out its own high-tech roadmap at its Autonomy and AI Day, which we'll be attending. Rivian CEO RJ Scaringe hyped up the company's vision in a recent interview on the <em>Automotive News</em> &#34;Shift&#34; podcast.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>不过，这不仅仅是关于机器人出租车和无人驾驶卡车。汽车公司也在更积极地进入这一领域。本周，Rivian 计划在其自动驾驶和人工智能日上展示自己的高科技路线图，我们将参加此次活动。Rivian 首席执行官 RJ Scaringe 在最近接受的 Automotive News&#34;Shift&#34;播客采访中对公司的愿景进行了宣传。</p>
</div><p>While robotaxis get the most attention, he said, personally-owned autonomous vehicles will be &#34;very powerful&#34; in the car business. Ninety-nine percent of all miles driven on U.S. roads are done in personal vehicles, he noted.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>他表示，尽管机器人出租车获得了最多关注，但个人拥有的自动驾驶车辆在汽车行业中将是&#34;非常强大的&#34;。他指出，美国道路上 99% 的行驶里程都是由个人车辆完成的。</p>
</div><p>&#34;The next few years will look entirelydifferent than the last few years,&#34; said Scaringe. &#34;Not just for Rivian, but for the automotive industry in general.&#34;</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>&#34;未来几年将与过去几年截然不同，&#34;Scaringe 说。&#34;不仅对 Rivian 而言，对整个汽车行业而言也是如此。&#34;</p>
</div><p>General Motors, Ford, Lucid and pretty much every brand in between have their own flavors of autonomous systems brewing. It's clear that there's a push for this tech to become mainstream and happen at a very rapid pace.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>通用汽车、福特、Lucid 以及几乎所有品牌都在酝酿自己的自动驾驶系统。显然，这项技术正在快速推进，力求成为主流。</p>
</div><p>The key question is whether or not brands can roll out these features quickly enough while still doing so safely. Autonomous vehicle accidents are still very high-profile, meaning that they garner the attention of media and regulators easily. That leaves very little room for error and the need to avoid the old software development mantraof &#34;move fast and break things.&#34;</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>关键问题是品牌是否能够在确保安全的同时快速推出这些功能。自动驾驶车辆事故仍然非常引人注目，这意味着它们很容易引起媒体和监管机构的关注。这几乎没有容错空间，也需要避免旧的软件开发理念&#34;快速行动，打破常规。&#34;</p>
</div><h2>50%: 100 Billion Extra Gallons Of Gas</h2>
<div class="lb-trans"><h2>50%：额外 1000 亿加仑汽油</h2>
</div><p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://cdn.motor1.com/images/static/16x9-tr.png" alt="Donald Trump EVs" original-src="https://cdn.motor1.com/images/static/16x9-tr.png"/></p>
<p>Photo by: InsideEVs</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>照片来源：InsideEVs</p>
</div><p>The Trump administration is touting its fuel economy rollback as a gift to car buyers. Consumers are chasing cheaper cars, after all, especially as the average transaction price of a new vehicle teeters around $50,000.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>特朗普政府将其燃油经济性回退宣传为对汽车买家的馈赠。毕竟，消费者正在追求更便宜的汽车，尤其是在新车的平均交易价格徘徊在 50,000 美元左右。</p>
</div><p>While lowering vehicle standards <em>could</em> make upfront vehicle costs cheaper, it won't necessarily save Americans money in the long run. That's according to analysts as well as the government's own analysis of the rule change.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>虽然降低车辆标准_可能_会使前期车辆成本更便宜，但从长远来看并不一定能为美国人节省钱。这是根据分析师以及政府对规则变更的自身分析得出的结论。</p>
</div><p>Reuters explains:</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>路透社 解释道：</p>
</div><blockquote>
<p>As a result, automakers would save $35 billion through 2031 and average upfront vehicle costs would decline by about $930, assuming the automakers pass along the savings, according to [the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's] economic analysis in support of the proposal.</p>
<p>But NHTSA’s same economic analysis also said the proposal would raise fuel consumption by around 100 billion gallons through 2050 relative to the Biden standard, costing Americans up to $185 billion.</p>
</blockquote>
<div class="lb-trans"><blockquote>
<p>因此，汽车制造商到 2031 年将节省 350 亿美元，假设汽车制造商将节省转嫁给消费者，平均前期车辆成本将下降约 930 美元，根据 国家公路交通安全管理局 的经济分析支持该提案。</p>
<p>但 NHTSA 的同一经济分析还表示，该提案将使燃油消耗到 2050 年增加约 1000 亿加仑，相较于拜登标准，可能使美国人损失高达 1850 亿美元。</p>
</blockquote>
</div><p>Critics also argue that the increased demand for gasoline could drive up the cost of fuel. This—completely ignoring the potential of less efficient powertrains—could easily trump the cost savings applied by rolling back fuel economy standards.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>批评者还认为，汽油需求的增加可能会推高燃料成本。这——完全忽视了效率较低的动力系统的潜力——可能会轻易抵消通过降低燃油经济性标准所带来的成本节省。</p>
</div><p>More from <em>Reuters</em>:</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>更多来自_路透社_：</p>
</div><blockquote>
<p>&#34;The Department of Transportation is now estimating larger upfront savings on technology costs, but they are also estimating even larger losses in fuel savings,&#34; said Jason Schwartz, legal director at New York University's Institute for Policy Integrity.</p>
<p>&#34;As for just how quickly any upfront savings will evaporate in the face of more money spent at the gas pump, very quickly indeed,&#34; he said.</p>
</blockquote>
<div class="lb-trans"><blockquote>
<p>&#34;交通部现在估计技术成本的前期节省更大，但他们也估计燃油节省的损失更大，&#34;纽约大学政策完整性研究所的法律主任杰森·施瓦茨说。</p>
<p>&#34;至于任何前期节省在加油时花费更多钱的情况下会消失得多快，确实会非常快，&#34;他说。</p>
</blockquote>
</div><p>Moreover, the reduced MPG standards would also raise carbon emissions by around 5%, according to data from NHTSA.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>此外，根据 NHTSA 的数据，降低的每加仑英里数标准还将使碳排放增加约 5%。</p>
</div><p>So, yes, the move could easily save automakers millions or even billions of dollars in the long run. But consumers? They'll likely be left holding the bag.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>所以，是的，这一举措可能会使汽车制造商在长期内节省数百万甚至数十亿美元。但消费者呢？他们可能会被留在一旁。</p>
</div><h2>75%: Volvo Believes America Still Wants EVs</h2>
<div class="lb-trans"><h2>75%：沃尔沃相信美国仍然想要电动车</h2>
</div><p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://cdn.motor1.com/images/static/16x9-tr.png" alt="2026 Volvo EX30" original-src="https://cdn.motor1.com/images/static/16x9-tr.png"/></p>
<p>Photo by: Kevin Williams/InsideEVs</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>照片来源：Kevin Williams/InsideEVs</p>
</div><p>Volvo has had quite a year. Not the fun kind, either. From software problems to tariffshenanigans, the Swedish automaker has been plagued with a combination of bad luck and the &#34;find out&#34; phase hitting it all at once.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>沃尔沃经历了不平凡的一年。这并不是有趣的那种。从软件问题到关税麻烦，这家瑞典汽车制造商遭遇了一系列的厄运和 “发现” 阶段的冲击。</p>
</div><p>Despite the hardships, its returning CEO,Håkan Samuelsson, still believes in electrification. Not only that, but he believes that America—which no longer has federal incentives for EVs—still wants to break up with gas.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>尽管面临困难，回归的首席执行官 Håkan Samuelsson 仍然相信电气化。不仅如此，他还认为美国——虽然不再有联邦电动车激励措施——仍然想要与燃油车分手。</p>
</div><p>Here's what Samuelsson said during an interview with Automotive News:</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>以下是 Samuelsson 在接受 汽车新闻 采访时所说的话：</p>
</div><blockquote>
<p>&#34;It will be difficult without the incentives, but on the other hand, you should be careful believing that the market will go back to combustion cars. Why? Because people have underestimated a big advantage of an having all-electric cars and long-range plug-in hybrids, which is that you can leave the garage filled up every morning.</p>
<p>With a long-range PHEV you can drive in electric mode for up to 200 km, which is about 125 miles. You very seldom need more range than that in a day, which means the driving experience would be much like an all-electric car. The backup engine would very seldom kick in.</p>
<p>Also, I think electrification is a valid solution in the U.S. because a lot of people have the possibility to charge at their homes. Therefore, I think in many respects, America is the ideal market for electrification.&#34;</p>
</blockquote>
<div class="lb-trans"><blockquote>
<p>&#34;没有激励措施会很困难，但另一方面，你应该谨慎地相信市场会回归燃油车。为什么？因为人们低估了全电动车和长续航插电式混合动力车的一个重要优势，那就是你可以每天早上都把车库里的车充满电。</p>
<p>使用长续航插电式混合动力车，你可以在电动模式下行驶最多 200 公里，约合 125 英里。你在一天中很少需要超过这个续航，这意味着驾驶体验与全电动车非常相似。备用发动机很少会启动。</p>
<p>此外，我认为电气化在美国是一个有效的解决方案，因为很多人有在家充电的可能性。因此，我认为在许多方面，美国是电气化的理想市场。&#34;</p>
</blockquote>
</div><p>Now, you might have picked up on something that Samuelsson said: plug-in hybrids.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>现在，你可能注意到了 Samuelsson 提到的一个点：插电式混合动力车。</p>
</div><p>Specifically,he seems to be betting the farm that America might not be all-in on battery-electric, but it will at least meet the industry half-way by buying loads of plug-in hybrids. That's something that Volvo thinks that it can deliver on with no problem.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>具体来说，他似乎在押注美国可能不会完全投入电池电动车，但至少会通过购买大量插电式混合动力车来与行业妥协。这是沃尔沃认为自己可以毫无问题地实现的目标。</p>
</div><h2>100%: PHEV or EREV: Which Are You Choosing?</h2>
<div class="lb-trans"><h2>100%：你会选择插电式混合动力车还是增程电动车？</h2>
</div><p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://cdn.motor1.com/images/static/16x9-tr.png" alt="Scout Traveler 2025 LA Auto Show" original-src="https://cdn.motor1.com/images/static/16x9-tr.png"/></p>
<p>Photo by: Scout Motors</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>照片来源：Scout Motors</p>
</div><p>Plug-in hybrids and extended-range EVs are getting a lot of attention right now. If conventional EVs were gone tomorrow, would you find yourself more interested in purchasing a PHEV or EREV?</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>插电式混合动力车和增程电动车目前正受到广泛关注。如果传统电动车明天消失，你会更倾向于购买插电式混合动力车还是增程电动车？</p>
</div><p>We want your opinion!</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>我们想听听你的意见！</p>
</div><p>What would you like to see on Insideevs.com?</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>你希望在 Insideevs.com 上看到什么？</p>
</div><p>Take our 3 minute survey.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>参加我们的 3 分钟调查。</p>
</div><p>- The InsideEVs team</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>- InsideEVs 团队</p>
</div><p>Share this Story</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>分享这个故事</p>
</div><ul>
<li>Facebook</li>
<li>X</li>
<li>LinkedIn</li>
<li>Flipboard</li>
<li>Reddit</li>
<li>WhatsApp</li>
<li>E-Mail</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>Facebook</li>
<li>X</li>
<li>LinkedIn</li>
<li>Flipboard</li>
<li>Reddit</li>
<li>WhatsApp</li>
<li>电子邮件</li>
</ul>
</div><p>GO TO COMMENTS</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>前往评论区</p>
</div><p>(</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>(</p>
</div><p>)</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>)</p>
</div><p>Got a tip for us? Email: tips@insideevs.com</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>有线索要告诉我们吗？邮箱：tips@insideevs.com</p>
</div><p>View all comments()</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>查看所有评论 ()</p>
</div>

“截然不同”：未来几年车辆自动化将彻底改变一切