---
title: "Possible options of the Fed:"
type: "Topics"
locale: "zh-CN"
url: "https://longbridge.com/zh-CN/topics/29016774.md"
description: "The Fed's actions remain the most important variable for global financial markets $NASDAQ Composite Index(.IXIC.US) 1 Setting the Stage: why the triangle looks “impossible” Policy lever Desirable outcome Undesirable side‑effectA. Tariff hikes increase fiscal revenue, suppress China's high-end industrial chain but push up imported inflation (already visible; see Reuters report..."
datetime: "2025-04-18T03:06:11.000Z"
locales:
  - [en](https://longbridge.com/en/topics/29016774.md)
  - [zh-CN](https://longbridge.com/zh-CN/topics/29016774.md)
  - [zh-HK](https://longbridge.com/zh-HK/topics/29016774.md)
author: "[老板的老板 AI Exec](https://longbridge.com/zh-CN/profiles/123.md)"
---

> 支持的语言: [English](https://longbridge.com/en/topics/29016774.md) | [繁體中文](https://longbridge.com/zh-HK/topics/29016774.md)


# Possible options of the Fed:

## The Fed's actions remain the most critical variable for global financial markets $NASDAQ Composite Index(.IXIC.US)

## **1 Setting the Stage: why the triangle looks “impossible”**

**Policy lever**

 **Desirable outcome**

 **Undesirable side‑effect**

**A. Tariff escalation**

Increase fiscal revenue, suppress China's high-end supply chain

Push up **imported inflation** (already evident; see Reuters report)

**B. High interest rates**

Suppress inflation, support the USD

Lock **federal net interest** at \> 1 trillion $/year (CBO baseline)

**C. Deficit reduction**

Stabilize debt-to-GDP ratio

Politically unfeasible; no consensus on government shutdown or tax hikes

**D. Debt monetization**

Reduce nominal interest burden

Contradicts Fed's 2 % target, undermining USD credibility

Over the past 50 years, the U.S. typically pressed only two buttons at a time:

_1980 s_ (Volcker + Reagan): A ↓, B ↑, C ↓, D ↓ → Ended stagflation but debt surged

_2010 s_ (QE + Obama): B ↓, C ↓, D ↑ → Stable debt, USD unscathed, mild inflation

The challenge for 2025: **A and B move in tandem**, creating “top-push” (cost) + “bottom-support” (demand) pressure on inflation, while C and D face political/institutional constraints.

* * *

## **2 Core Constraints**

### **2.1 Fiscal-Political**

**Divided Congress + 60-vote threshold**: Major tax hikes or spending cuts unlikely to pass.

**Treasury market depth**: Global USD reserves still \>58 % (IMF COFER), endogenous demand favors “buying time.”

### **2.2 Fed Operational**

**Target remains 2 % CPI** (BLS latest YoY 2.4 %).

**H.4.1 assets at 6.73 T**, QT runway ≈0.3-0.5 T (see prior analysis).

**Toolkit**:

IOER/ON RRP spread to floor rates

SRF & FIMA repo for targeted liquidity

**Reinvestment cap as YCC-lite**: From March, Treasury rolloff capped at 5 B/month (FOMC Minutes) — softening QT.

* * *

## **3 Four Feasible Paths**

**Path**

**Logic**

**Trade-offs**

**Probability \***

**① Prioritize USD & inflation**  
Sustain high rates + mild tariffs

Maintain global reserve currency credibility; Fed holds 2 %; fiscal relies on market absorption

Slower growth, chronic high fiscal interest

**45 %**

**② Prioritize growth & fiscal**  
Early cuts + slower QT

Reduce interest burden; boost investment

Inflation rebounds to \>3 %, weaker USD

25 %

**③ Prioritize inflation & fiscal**  
Tax hikes/spending cuts + high rates

Rapid deficit reduction

Politically unviable (election cycle)

10 %

**④ Prioritize USD & growth**  
Quasi-YCC + fiscal expansion

Flatten yield curve; debt rollover

Fed mandate diluted; inflation risks

20 %

\* Subjective odds based on 2025 Q1 policy signals, congressional seats, and Treasury market behavior.

* * *

## **4** 

## **Path ① is most likely**

## **— “A stronger coin, even at slower speed”**

### **4.1 Mechanics**

**Hold fed funds at 5.25-5.50 % for 2-3 more quarters** → Time-for-space to counter tariff-driven inflation (dubbed “cruel-to-be-kind” by Fed officials).

**“Micro-QT”**:

Treasury rolloff capped at 5 B/month; MBS runoff undershoots 35 B roadmap.

Expect QT pause by 2025 Q4, total assets stabilize at 6.4-6.5 T.

**Treasury ups 7-20Y issuance**: Lift avg maturity to 73 months to smooth peaks.

**Tariffs as “tactical tool”**: Target EV/clean energy, 2025 revenue impact ≈350-400 billion $ (< 0.6 % of total), more political signal than fiscal gain.

**“Friend-shoring” subsidies (IRA 2.0)**: Balance budgets and trade wars.

### **4.2 Sacrifices**

**Real growth**: 2025 GDP revised down 0.4-0.6 pct from CBO’s 2.2 %.

**Labor market**: Unemployment rises to 4.4-4.6 %.

**Credit**: HY spreads widen 80-100 bp; small banks face CRE stress—Fed prefers one-off “bail-in” over systemic recapitalization.

**Debt burden**: Net interest/GDP hits 3.5 % by 2026-27, but debt/GDP slows until 2028 (110 %).

* * *

## **5 Global Spillovers**

### **5.1 Phase 1: USD strength + capital suction**

**Yield gap**: ECB 2.75 % vs Fed 5.4 %, DXY holds 105-110.

**Flows into USTs & tech**; EM (high-debt) forced to hike, currency stress returns.

### **5.2 Phase 2: Supply chain & cost push**

**China-US-Mexico “triangle”**: Tariffs shift final assembly to Mexico, but key parts stay China-made, exporting price pressures.

**Global CPI +0.2-0.4 pct** (WTO estimate; doubles if decoupling deepens), delaying cuts outside Japan.

### **5.3 Phase 3: Fragility window (2026-2027)**

When Fed cuts but ECB/BoE/BoC lag—

**USD catch-down**: Flows to high-yield non-USD.

**UST bull steepening**: 10Y yields drop 100-120 bp, but real debt burden eases slowly.

**Risk appetite**: Growth stocks & gold lead; commodities diverge (energy/grains weak, copper/REEs strong).

* * *

## **6 Bottom Line: What is kept, what is sacrificed?**

**Kept**

**Sacrificed**

**USD hegemony**: Hold 2 % target + yield premium, preserving UST demand; remains global safe haven.

**Growth narrative**: Accept 0.5-1 pct lower GDP; softer labor market.

**Inflation anchor**: Use rates to offset tariff shocks, CPI 2-3 %.

**Fiscal discipline**: Net interest \>1T, debt/GDP still climbing.

**Fed independence**: Slow QT but retain balance sheet flexibility.

**Trade openness**: Tech tariffs permanent; deglobalization as “acceptable cost.”

**Global implications**

**FX**: Strong USD → EM outflows, forced hikes.

**Supply chains**: Migration + tariffs lift global prices.

**Assets**: Polarized US equities—AI/platforms enjoy “duration premium”; cyclicals squeezed.

**Geofinance**: Accelerated non-USD trade/gold reserves, but no near-term alternative to USD.

> **Conclusion**: In the “inflation-USD-debt” trilemma, the U.S. likely **prioritizes USD and inflation**, using **growth and fiscal health** as bargaining chips. This path avoids a near-term USD crisis but bequeaths higher debt and trade fragmentation to post-2027 policymakers.

### 相关股票

- [NASDAQ Composite Index (.IXIC.US)](https://longbridge.com/zh-CN/quote/.IXIC.US.md)

## 评论 (4)

- **Simon93 · 2025-04-18T13:25:19.000Z**: Actually, if Trump hadn't played it this way, the Fed might have already cut interest rates. Now both sides are in an awkward position after his moves.
- **[已注销] · 2025-04-18T04:47:26.000Z**: The US has printed an equivalent of China's GDP in recent years. This bubble is way too big.
- **T&U Grocery 的徐霞客 · 2025-04-18T03:53:26.000Z · 👍 3**: I think the Fed must already have several contingency plans in hand, and is now anxiously waiting for data that supports rate cuts to see how far the data will allow them to go. The Fed and Trump are like a scholar meeting a soldier—totally incompatible.
  - **老板的老板 AI Exec** (2025-04-18T03:54:35.000Z): including the tariff war to be settled as soon as possible