---
title: "Paisabazaar 在《匿名財產交易法》下遭遇不利命令"
type: "News"
locale: "zh-HK"
url: "https://longbridge.com/zh-HK/news/281216215.md"
description: "PB Fintech 的子公司 Paisabazaar 收到了來自裁決機構的關於《1988 年禁止本名財產交易法》的不利裁定。該裁定日期為 2026 年 3 月 24 日，確認了之前針對某些供應商的裁決，指控 Paisabazaar 為交易的 “實益擁有者”。儘管如此，PB Fintech 堅稱該裁決不會影響其財務健康，並計劃對此決定提出上訴"
datetime: "2026-03-31T07:56:31.000Z"
locales:
  - [zh-CN](https://longbridge.com/zh-CN/news/281216215.md)
  - [en](https://longbridge.com/en/news/281216215.md)
  - [zh-HK](https://longbridge.com/zh-HK/news/281216215.md)
---

# Paisabazaar 在《匿名財產交易法》下遭遇不利命令

PB Fintech, the parent entity of fintech major Policybazaar, on Friday told exchanges that its wholly owned subsidiary, Paisabazaar Marketing and Consulting Private Limited, has received an adverse order from the Office of the Adjudicating Authority under the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988. The order, dated March 24, 2026, was received by the company on March 26.

This development follows an earlier communication from the company in November 2024 regarding proceedings under the same Act. According to the regulatory filing, the Adjudicating Authority (AA) has confirmed an order previously passed by the Initiating Officer (IO) on February 27, 2025. That original order was issued against certain vendors of Paisabazaar, in which the fintech firm was alleged to be the “beneficial owner” in respect of its transactions with them.

Under Section 26(3) of the PBPT Act, the Adjudicating Authority has the power to pass an order holding a property to be “benami” if it determines that the property in question — in this case, transaction-related assets — is held by one person but paid for by another for their own benefit.

However, PB Fintech has maintained that the ruling will not have an immediate impact on its financial or operational health. The company stated that because the order is appealable, it intends to challenge the AA’s findings before the relevant appellate tribunal in due course.

“Since the order is appealable and the Company shall file an appeal against the order in due course, there is no financial impact at this point of time,” the company said in its disclosure to the National Stock Exchange and BSE.

### 相關股票

- [PBBK.US](https://longbridge.com/zh-HK/quote/PBBK.US.md)

## 相關資訊與研究

- [經紀商責任裁決對整體運輸板塊的潛在影響](https://longbridge.com/zh-HK/news/286685063.md)
- [升班附加賽資格被取消 修鹹頓上訴遭駁回稱裁決令人痛心](https://longbridge.com/zh-HK/news/287132766.md)
- [張雪機車再包攬雙冠 賽季 10 戰 5 勝 劍指年度總冠軍](https://longbridge.com/zh-HK/news/286733724.md)
- [訴訟失利 馬斯克痛斥裁決為「程序細節」揚言上訴到底](https://longbridge.com/zh-HK/news/286872580.md)
- [美國上訴法院下令暫緩執行判定川普 10% 關税違法的裁決](https://longbridge.com/zh-HK/news/286155067.md)