--- title: "The real path of a profit-sharing trader: Different methods, why can they all lead to stability?" type: "Topics" locale: "zh-HK" url: "https://longbridge.com/zh-HK/topics/38851719.md" description: "Happy Chinese New Year! EagleTrader here wishes all traders who are still persevering in the market a prosperous new year—may the new year bring clear trades, steady rhythm, and an upward curve. There has never been a single answer on the path of trading. Some rely on discipline, some on structure, some learn to survive from losses, and others build stability through long-term execution. Over the past year, we've had in-depth exchanges with many traders from vastly different backgrounds. Their paths and methods vary, but they ultimately head in the same direction: forming a sustainable trading system. At the beginning of the new year..." datetime: "2026-02-24T09:03:19.000Z" locales: - [en](https://longbridge.com/en/topics/38851719.md) - [zh-CN](https://longbridge.com/zh-CN/topics/38851719.md) - [zh-HK](https://longbridge.com/zh-HK/topics/38851719.md) author: "[EagleTrader老鹰交易员](https://longbridge.com/zh-HK/profiles/26191375.md)" --- > 支持的語言: [English](https://longbridge.com/en/topics/38851719.md) | [简体中文](https://longbridge.com/zh-CN/topics/38851719.md) # The real path of a profit-sharing trader: Different methods, why can they all lead to stability? ![Header Image](https://pub.pbkrs.com/social/2026/26191375/v1pX1HT8bNmGq22M5L2d9LLur8GTLzHm.jpg?x-oss-process=style/lg) Happy New Year! EagleTrader here wishes all traders who are still persevering in the market a smooth new year—may the new year bring clear trades, stable rhythms, and upward curves. There has never been a single answer on the path of trading. Some rely on discipline, some on structure, some learn to survive from losses, and others build stability through long-term execution. Over the past year, we have had in-depth conversations with multiple traders from vastly different backgrounds. Their paths and methods differ, but they ultimately all moved in the same direction: forming a sustainable trading system. At the beginning of the new year, summarization and calibration are often more important than looking ahead, and trading is no different. Taking this opportunity, we have compiled the most authentic trading approaches of three traders. Perhaps you will find—the methods can differ, but the underlying logic of stable trading is highly consistent. **Dong Xinyu: The Person Who Wrote "Losing Less" into the Rules** **Trading Type: Intraday Minute-Level Subjective Trend Trading** ![fLFpONwBL](https://pub.pbkrs.com/social/2026/26191375/NvBcbYRipCoxgDJ1zudHzEQeHxHvvYo1.jpg?x-oss-process=style/lg) During the first interview with Dong Xinyu, he repeatedly mentioned a number: **0.5%**. This is the maximum loss he allows for a single trade. No matter how bullish the market looks, once the stop-loss is triggered, he must exit. He is a typical subjective trader, and the biggest trap for subjective trading is "this time is different." Dong Xinyu uses rules to lock down this impulse: **determine position size based on risk**. **First determine the maximum acceptable loss, then work backward to calculate the position size. No matter how tempting the market, the position must match the stop-loss**—he calls this "putting a bridle on desire." ![pexels-maxbond-7807839](https://pub.pbkrs.com/social/2026/26191375/CngjCJDYkyQtZBrb5rJdMuRPxxdcUJmr.jpg?x-oss-process=style/lg) His trading is more like "defensive counterattack": - **Only judge whether it's in a one-sided trend (moving averages + candlestick structure)** - **Entries mainly based on breakouts or pullbacks, no bottom-fishing or top-picking** - **Position size derived from risk, can add positions but with independent risk control** - **Fixed hard stop-loss, subjectively exit early when necessary** He admits his win rate is not high, but this is an actively chosen "low win rate + high profit/loss ratio." For him, stability comes from **"losing small, not winning big."** **Su Huahan: Using Trendlines as "Speed Bumps" for Himself** **Trading Type: Swing Trend Trading** ![Su](https://pub.pbkrs.com/social/2026/26191375/cKX7Q468zG3dJ3k1ztgjsiLA37z3Uqvt.jpg?x-oss-process=style/lg) Su Huahan, with an engineering background, experienced long-term fluctuations and even frequent losses in live trading until he entered a proprietary trading system and gradually achieved stable profitability. The market didn't change; what truly changed was—**rules**. In live trading, he was prone to seeking quick success; but in an environment with risk control boundaries and drawdown limits, he was instead forced to execute the correct actions. His trading is extremely simple: only uses trendlines. But for him, trendlines are not a prediction tool but a "speed bump" that forces him to only trade clear trend swings, actively giving up short-term speculation. He is aware of his own disadvantage—reaction speed is not as fast as professional traders—so he chooses: **trade time for space, hold positions well**. Regarding position sizing, he always maintains a safety factor, like leaving a margin in engineering design: **can hold if the direction is right, not fatal if the direction is wrong**. For him, stability comes from—**rules restraining human nature**. **Li Shuailong: The Person Who Trades Stability for Fewer Variables** **Trading Type: Systematic Swing Trading** ![Li](https://pub.pbkrs.com/social/2026/26191375/LrVRzAAqyhPj784D4k2AYwNyLc6fYxNK.jpg?x-oss-process=style/lg) In Li Shuailong's trading system, the core is not predicting the market but consistent long-term execution. He makes his trading structure more stable by reducing variables: - **Long-term fixed position size, does not increase position based on profits or losses** - **Often only trades in one direction to reduce judgment interference** - **Fixed time for analysis and trading, does not over-watch the market after holding positions** - **Uses structural failure as the basis for exit, not emotional profit-taking** This approach reduces human intervention, making trading closer to systematic execution. ![pexels-alphatradezone-5831529](https://pub.pbkrs.com/social/2026/26191375/W4pRD6H7KN2LGzaiAXBbSTu4bsFMJuej.jpg?x-oss-process=style/lg) In risk management, he sets stop-losses at key structural levels, not based on subjective decisions about loss amounts. When the structure breaks, he exits immediately, keeping the risk boundary always clear. As experience accumulates, his focus has shifted from "how much can I make" to "how much will I lose when wrong." As long as the risk is controllable, execute! His trading does not seek explosive gains but is more likely to form a stable, replicable long-term rhythm. ![pexels-alphatradezone-5833756](https://pub.pbkrs.com/social/2026/26191375/Fb7YNeFR3a4AFZSmLfWrGgxxMzp8Mq17.jpg?x-oss-process=style/lg) Looking back at these traders on different paths: some subjective, some systematic; some short-term, some swing. But as trading gradually matures, they all converge on the same core—keeping trading in a state of controllable risk, stable execution, and clear structure. Paths can differ, tools can differ, rhythms can differ, but stable trading is often built on a similar foundation: first secure the risk boundary, then pursue long-term growth. The essence of trading has never been predicting the market, but managing oneself. When risk is controlled and behavior is repeatable, profit is just a result of time. May every trader still on the road slowly move towards stability on their own path.