What is Fama And French Three Factor Model?

3287 reads · Last updated: December 5, 2024

The Fama and French Three-Factor Model is an asset pricing model developed in 1992 that expands on the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) by adding size risk and value risk factors to the market risk factor in CAPM. This model considers the fact that value and small-cap stocks outperform markets on a regular basis. By including these two additional factors, the model adjusts for this outperforming tendency, which is thought to make it a better tool for evaluating manager performance.

Definition

The Fama-French Three-Factor Model is an asset pricing model introduced in 1992. It builds on the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) by adding size risk and value risk factors. The model accounts for the fact that value stocks and small-cap stocks often perform well in the market. By including these two additional factors, the model adjusts for this tendency and is considered a better tool for evaluating manager performance.

Origin

The Fama-French Three-Factor Model was proposed by Eugene Fama and Kenneth French in 1992. The model was developed to improve upon the CAPM, which only considers the market risk factor. Fama and French, through empirical research, found that size and value factors significantly impact stock returns, thus incorporating them into the model.

Categories and Features

The Fama-French Three-Factor Model includes three main factors: the market risk factor, the size factor, and the value factor. The market risk factor is the same as in CAPM, reflecting the overall market volatility. The size factor (SMB) considers that small-cap stocks typically have higher returns than large-cap stocks. The value factor (HML) reflects that value stocks (high book-to-market ratio) generally outperform growth stocks (low book-to-market ratio). The model's advantage lies in better explaining the variability of stock returns, but it also increases the model's complexity.

Case Studies

A typical case is the performance of small-cap stocks in the early 2000s. Many small-cap companies performed well after the dot-com bubble burst, and the Fama-French model could explain this phenomenon because it considers the size factor. Another case is the recovery performance of value stocks after the 2008 financial crisis. Value stocks rebounded quickly after the crisis, and the Fama-French model explained this through the value factor.

Common Issues

Common issues investors face when applying the Fama-French Three-Factor Model include accurately estimating the size and value factors and the stability of these factors under different market conditions. Additionally, the model's complexity may lead to overfitting issues, so investors need to use it cautiously.

Suggested for You

Refresh

A liquidity trap is an adverse economic situation that can occur when consumers and investors hoard cash rather than spending or investing it even when interest rates are low, stymying efforts by economic policymakers to stimulate economic growth.The term was first used by economist John Maynard Keynes, who defined a liquidity trap as a condition that can occur when interest rates fall so low that most people prefer to let cash sit rather than put money into bonds and other debt instruments. The effect, Keynes said, is to leave monetary policymakers powerless to stimulate growth by increasing the money supply or lowering the interest rate further.A liquidity trap may develop when consumers and investors keep their cash in checking and savings accounts because they believe interest rates will soon rise. That would make bond prices fall, and make them a less attractive option.Since Keynes' day, the term has been used more broadly to describe a condition of slow economic growth caused by widespread cash hoarding due to concern about a negative event that may be coming.

Liquidity Trap

A liquidity trap is an adverse economic situation that can occur when consumers and investors hoard cash rather than spending or investing it even when interest rates are low, stymying efforts by economic policymakers to stimulate economic growth.The term was first used by economist John Maynard Keynes, who defined a liquidity trap as a condition that can occur when interest rates fall so low that most people prefer to let cash sit rather than put money into bonds and other debt instruments. The effect, Keynes said, is to leave monetary policymakers powerless to stimulate growth by increasing the money supply or lowering the interest rate further.A liquidity trap may develop when consumers and investors keep their cash in checking and savings accounts because they believe interest rates will soon rise. That would make bond prices fall, and make them a less attractive option.Since Keynes' day, the term has been used more broadly to describe a condition of slow economic growth caused by widespread cash hoarding due to concern about a negative event that may be coming.

Liquidity Crisis

A liquidity crisis is a financial situation characterized by a lack of cash or easily-convertible-to-cash assets on hand across many businesses or financial institutions simultaneously.In a liquidity crisis, liquidity problems at individual institutions lead to an acute increase in demand and decrease in supply of liquidity, and the resulting lack of available liquidity can lead to widespread defaults and even bankruptcies.

Liquidity Crisis

A liquidity crisis is a financial situation characterized by a lack of cash or easily-convertible-to-cash assets on hand across many businesses or financial institutions simultaneously.In a liquidity crisis, liquidity problems at individual institutions lead to an acute increase in demand and decrease in supply of liquidity, and the resulting lack of available liquidity can lead to widespread defaults and even bankruptcies.

Liquidity Event

A liquidity event is an acquisition, merger, initial public offering (IPO), or other action that allows founders and early investors in a company to cash out some or all of their ownership shares.A liquidity event is considered an exit strategy for an illiquid investment or equity with little or no market to trade on. Founders of a firm push toward a liquidity event, and investors like venture capital (VC) firms, angel investors, or private equity firms expect one within a reasonable amount of time after initially investing capital.

Liquidity Event

A liquidity event is an acquisition, merger, initial public offering (IPO), or other action that allows founders and early investors in a company to cash out some or all of their ownership shares.A liquidity event is considered an exit strategy for an illiquid investment or equity with little or no market to trade on. Founders of a firm push toward a liquidity event, and investors like venture capital (VC) firms, angel investors, or private equity firms expect one within a reasonable amount of time after initially investing capital.

Liquid Alternatives

Liquid alternative investments (or liquid alts) are mutual funds or exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that aim to provide investors with diversification and downside protection through exposure to alternative investment strategies. These products' selling point is that they are liquid, meaning that they can be bought and sold daily, unlike traditional alternatives which offer monthly or quarterly liquidity. They come with lower minimum investments than the typical hedge fund, and investors don't have to pass net-worth or income requirements to invest. Critics argue that the liquidity of so-called liquid alts will not hold up in more trying market conditions; most of the capital invested in liquid alts has entered the market during the post-financial crisis bull market. Critics also contend that the fees for liquid alternatives are too high. For proponents, though, liquid alts are a valuable innovation because they make the strategies employed by hedge funds accessible to retail investors.

Liquid Alternatives

Liquid alternative investments (or liquid alts) are mutual funds or exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that aim to provide investors with diversification and downside protection through exposure to alternative investment strategies. These products' selling point is that they are liquid, meaning that they can be bought and sold daily, unlike traditional alternatives which offer monthly or quarterly liquidity. They come with lower minimum investments than the typical hedge fund, and investors don't have to pass net-worth or income requirements to invest. Critics argue that the liquidity of so-called liquid alts will not hold up in more trying market conditions; most of the capital invested in liquid alts has entered the market during the post-financial crisis bull market. Critics also contend that the fees for liquid alternatives are too high. For proponents, though, liquid alts are a valuable innovation because they make the strategies employed by hedge funds accessible to retail investors.

Zero-Coupon Convertible

A zero-coupon convertible is a fixed income instrument that combines the features of a zero-coupon bond with that of a convertible bond.Due to the zero-coupon feature, the bond pays no interest and is therefore issued at a discount to par value, while the convertible feature means that bondholders have the option to convert bonds into common stock of the issuer at a certain conversion price.

Zero-Coupon Convertible

A zero-coupon convertible is a fixed income instrument that combines the features of a zero-coupon bond with that of a convertible bond.Due to the zero-coupon feature, the bond pays no interest and is therefore issued at a discount to par value, while the convertible feature means that bondholders have the option to convert bonds into common stock of the issuer at a certain conversion price.

Zero-Investment Portfolio

A zero-investment portfolio is a collection of investments that has a net value of zero when the portfolio is assembled, and therefore requires an investor to take no equity stake in the portfolio. For instance, an investor may short sell $1,000 worth of stocks in one set of companies, and use the proceeds to purchase $1,000 in stock in another set of companies.

Zero-Investment Portfolio

A zero-investment portfolio is a collection of investments that has a net value of zero when the portfolio is assembled, and therefore requires an investor to take no equity stake in the portfolio. For instance, an investor may short sell $1,000 worth of stocks in one set of companies, and use the proceeds to purchase $1,000 in stock in another set of companies.