What is Genuine Progress Indicator ?
705 reads · Last updated: December 5, 2024
A genuine progress indicator (GPI) is a metric used to measure the economic growth of a country. It is often considered an alternative metric to the more well-known gross domestic product (GDP) economic indicator. The GPI indicator takes everything the GDP uses into account but adds other figures that represent the cost of the negative effects related to economic activity, such as the cost of crime, cost of ozone depletion, and cost of resource depletion, among others.The GPI nets the positive and negative results of economic growth to examine whether or not it has benefited people overall.
Definition
The Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI) is a measure used to assess the economic growth of a country. It is often considered an alternative to the more well-known Gross Domestic Product (GDP) economic indicator. GPI takes into account everything used in GDP but adds additional data representing the costs of negative impacts associated with economic activities, such as crime costs, ozone depletion costs, and resource depletion costs. GPI examines whether the positive and negative outcomes of economic growth are beneficial to the people.
Origin
The concept of the Genuine Progress Indicator originated in the 1990s as a supplement and improvement to the traditional GDP indicator. GPI was proposed to more comprehensively reflect the impact of economic activities on society and the environment, first introduced by economists and environmental scholars in 1995.
Categories and Features
GPI is mainly divided into three categories: economic, social, and environmental. The economic aspect includes traditional GDP calculations, the social aspect considers factors such as education, health, and crime, and the environmental aspect includes resource depletion and pollution. The feature of GPI is that it comprehensively considers the positive and negative impacts of economic activities, providing a more holistic assessment of economic health.
Case Studies
A typical case is California, USA, which adopted GPI in 2004 to evaluate the impact of its economic policies. Through GPI, California was able to better understand the impact of economic growth on the environment and society, leading to more sustainable policy-making. Another case is Maryland, which began using GPI in 2010 to supplement GDP, aiming to more comprehensively assess the impact of economic development on residents' quality of life.
Common Issues
Common issues investors face when applying GPI include how to accurately measure the costs of negative impacts and how to incorporate these costs into economic decision-making. A common misconception is that GPI completely replaces GDP, whereas in reality, GPI complements GDP, providing a more comprehensive perspective on economic health.
