What is No-Shop Clause?

477 reads · Last updated: December 5, 2024

A no-shop clause is a clause found in an agreement between a seller and a potential buyer that bars the seller from soliciting a purchase proposal from any other party. In other words, the seller cannot shop the business or asset around once a letter of intent or agreement in principle is entered into between the seller and the potential buyer. The letter of intent outlines one party's commitment to do business and/or execute a deal with another.No-shop clauses, which are also called no solicitation clauses, are usually prescribed by large, high-profile companies. Sellers typically agree to these clauses as an act of good faith. Parties that engage in a no-shop clause often include an expiration date in the agreement. This means they are only in effect for a short period of time, and cannot be set indefinitely.

Definition

A no-shop clause is a provision in an agreement between a seller and a potential buyer that prohibits the seller from soliciting purchase proposals from any other parties. In other words, once a letter of intent or a principal agreement is reached between the seller and the potential buyer, the seller cannot market the business or assets to others.

Origin

The origin of the no-shop clause can be traced back to merger and acquisition transactions, designed to protect the buyer's interests by preventing the seller from engaging with other potential buyers during negotiations. As M&A activities increased, this clause became a common practice in large transactions.

Categories and Features

No-shop clauses are typically divided into two categories: strict no-shop clauses and limited no-shop clauses. Strict no-shop clauses completely prohibit the seller from contacting other buyers, while limited no-shop clauses allow limited contact under specific conditions. Their features include protecting the buyer's exclusive negotiation rights and increasing transaction certainty, but they may also limit the seller's opportunity to receive better offers.

Case Studies

Case 1: In 2016, during AT&T's acquisition of Time Warner, a no-shop clause was signed to ensure that Time Warner would not engage with other potential buyers before the transaction was completed. Case 2: In 2019, Anheuser-Busch InBev used a no-shop clause in the sale of its Australian business to Asahi Group to ensure the smooth progress of the transaction.

Common Issues

Investors might worry that no-shop clauses limit the seller's flexibility, potentially leading to missed better offers. Additionally, the duration of the clause is a key issue, as an overly long duration might affect the seller's market competitiveness.

Suggested for You

Refresh
buzzwords icon
Fast-Moving Consumer Goods
Fast-moving consumer goods (FMCGs) are products that sell quickly at relatively low cost. FMCGs have a short shelf life because of high consumer demand (e.g., soft drinks and confections) or because they are perishable (e.g., meat, dairy products, and baked goods).They are bought often, consumed rapidly, priced low, and sold in large quantities. They also have a high turnover on store shelves. The largest FMCG companies by revenue are among the best known, such as Nestle SA. (NSRGY) ($99.32 billion in 2023 earnings) and PepsiCo Inc. (PEP) ($91.47 billion). From the 1980s up to the early 2010s, the FMCG sector was a paradigm of stable and impressive growth; annual revenue was consistently around 9% in the first decade of this century, with returns on invested capital (ROIC) at 22%.

Fast-Moving Consumer Goods

Fast-moving consumer goods (FMCGs) are products that sell quickly at relatively low cost. FMCGs have a short shelf life because of high consumer demand (e.g., soft drinks and confections) or because they are perishable (e.g., meat, dairy products, and baked goods).They are bought often, consumed rapidly, priced low, and sold in large quantities. They also have a high turnover on store shelves. The largest FMCG companies by revenue are among the best known, such as Nestle SA. (NSRGY) ($99.32 billion in 2023 earnings) and PepsiCo Inc. (PEP) ($91.47 billion). From the 1980s up to the early 2010s, the FMCG sector was a paradigm of stable and impressive growth; annual revenue was consistently around 9% in the first decade of this century, with returns on invested capital (ROIC) at 22%.