<div id="readability-page-1"><div><div><p>Advanced Micro Devices <span>AMD</span> pays its AI experts well, but it's not following Meta Platforms' <span>META</span> footsteps. AMD CEO Lisa Su recently said that the AI chipmaker will not offer $100 million packages to compete with Meta Platforms as they recruit AI talent.</p><p>Su mentioned that money is &#34;not necessarily the most important thing when you're attracting talent&#34; in an interview with Wired. While it might sound like AMD is taking the cheap route, the company pays its employees well, and Su's expanded explanation reveals key business lessons.</p><h2>It's Not About One Person</h2><p>The most successful companies get more out of the whole than the sum of their parts. A talented AI professional will help a company, but it takes many people to create technological change. Giving one AI talent a $100 million package can hurt the work culture Su has spent years cultivating at AMD. </p><p><strong>Don't Miss:</strong></p><ul> <li><strong>The same firms that backed Uber, Venmo and eBay are investing in this pre-IPO company disrupting a $1.8T market — <strong>and you can too at just $2.90/share.</strong></strong></li> <li><strong>‘Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. You can <strong>invest today for just $0.30/share.</strong></strong></li> </ul><p>It can cause other workers to feel undercut since they have been producing tremendous work, but didn't receive $100 million. Su still believes in competitive offers and told Wired that AMD's staff isn't underpaid. You have to pay top dollar to get top talent. However, the contracts can get so lucrative that money doesn't matter as much. Most people can live lavishly on $5 million per year, and at some point, the focus shifts toward how much of a technological impact every AI talent wants to have on the world.</p><p>Su touted in that interview how AMD is at the forefront of change and that the chipmaker's work is having a tangible and substantial impact on the world. Offering a big pay package to one employee acknowledges a superstar while potentially belittling the people who have worked hard for many years but don't get paid anywhere close to that level.</p><p><strong>Trending: Kevin O'Leary Says Real Estate's Been a Smart Bet for 200 Years — <strong>This Platform Lets Anyone Tap Into It</strong></strong></p><h2>Mission Vs. Paycheck</h2><p>Su doesn't just want to hire people who can get the job done. She wants people who are more invested in AMD's mission than they are in a paycheck. Meta Platforms' nine-figure contracts are hard for anyone to match. </p><p>While Meta Platforms will get talented AI workers, those individuals may be only accepting those offers since they are the most lucrative. The paycheck may be a bigger driving force for some these hiring decisions than someone's desire to change the world with artificial intelligence.</p><p>AMD workers still get paid well, but by not being the top bidder, the company ensures it's working with employees who are aligned with the chipmaker’s mission. An employee who isn't aligned with the company's mission may drag the team down, especially if that employee is getting paid far more than everyone else.</p><h2>No Favorites</h2><p>Meta Platforms is comfortable doling out money to the top AI talent, but it comes at a time when the company wants to cut 5% of its workforce. The company has ruthlessly focused on efficiency, which has rewarded shareholders. However, giving out billion-dollar contracts to some workers while emphasizing how expendable other people are can create a bad work culture.</p><p>You can bring the best talent into a workplace, but if the culture is bad, it can thwart attempts at innovation. That's part of the reason why Su doesn't want to play favorites at AMD, and that includes balking at the idea of $100 million salaries.</p><p>The lack of favorites also ensures that all employees go through the same, fair process as they climb AMD's corporate ladder and advance to new positions. While it might sound like AMD is playing cheap as Meta Platforms burns through money like no tomorrow, it's actually a smart move that can preserve AMD's healthy work culture.</p><p><em><strong>Image: Shutterstock</strong></em></p></div></div></div>

AMDL

<p>AMD CEO Lisa Su stated that the company will not match Meta Platforms' $100 million salaries for AI talent, emphasizing that attracting talent is not solely about money. Su believes in fostering a strong work culture and aligning employees with AMD's mission rather than offering exorbitant pay packages. While AMD compensates its employees well, it aims to avoid creating disparities that could harm team dynamics. This approach is seen as a strategy to maintain a healthy work environment and promote innovation, contrasting with Meta's focus on high salaries amidst workforce cuts.</p>

- AMD CEO Lisa Su stated that the company will not offer $100 million packages to attract AI talent, emphasizing that money isn't the most important factor in recruitment.  
- Su believes that a collaborative work culture is essential for technological change, and offering exorbitant salaries can undermine team morale and the company's mission.  
- By focusing on alignment with AMD's goals rather than just financial incentives, the company aims to foster a healthy work environment that encourages innovation.  

AMD Isn't Keeping Up With Meta Platforms' $100 Million Salaries For AI Talent, And The Reason Is Brilliant