Although the broader equities market can occasionally vacillate between order and outright chaos, small-capitalization enterprises tend to amplify the extreme ends of behavioral distribution. By their nature, businesses that are less financially resourced must operate with tighter margins for error. They also tend to enjoy less diversified revenue streams and have greater dependence on economic momentum.



In effect, small caps act as high-beta expressions of investor confidence — or lack thereof. It's no wonder that many investors view this space as a high-risk, high-reward environment.



It's not just rhetorical flourishing as the underlying technical performance tends to showcase this dynamic. On a year-to-date basis, the Russell 2000 — which is the small-cap U.S. stock market index — has gained 12.45%. During the same period, the vanilla S&amp;P 500 has moved up 15.19%. However, in the trailing six months, the small-cap benchmark is up nearly 19%.



The S&amp;P? It's only up 13.52%, thus demonstrating the technical thesis behind smaller enterprises. For outright growth potential, it's difficult to match the prowess of small caps. However, the established industry stalwarts command the financial resources to buffet broader macro pressures. As such, investors tend to trust the large caps more — especially during periods of shifting investor risk appetite.



For example, between Oct. 20 through Nov. 20, the S&amp;P lost just under 3%. Much of the anxieties can be tied to bubble fears impacting artificial intelligence, which represented a major concern heading into the aforementioned period of weakness. But while most of the capital market incurred some pain during the one-month period, the Russell 2000 appeared to suffer a disproportionate impact, losing almost 8%.



On the flipside, events such as the Federal Reserve cutting the benchmark interest rate earlier this month seem to have a stronger impact on the small caps — and that would make plenty of sense. These are businesses that are eschewing other priorities for growth, which allows them to catch big waves higher.



Of course, this tradeoff comes at the price stability. When macro conditions like liquidity cycles or investor risk appetite pivot sharply, the reaction can be quite severe.



The Direxion ETFs: With that tension in mind, directional conviction in small caps often becomes less about certainty and more about expressing a defined view. Recognizing that rational market participants can interpret the same data in very different ways, financial services provider Direxion offers two exchange-traded funds designed to capture opposing outcomes in the small-cap space.



On the bullish side, the Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (NYSE:TNA) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the performance of the aforementioned Russell index. Conversely, the Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares (NYSE:TZA) targets 300% of the inverse of that same index's daily performance.



For many retail traders, the appeal of TNA and TZA lies in their simplicity of execution. Gaining leveraged or bearish exposure through options, futures or short-selling can introduce layers of complexity, including margin requirements and contract-specific risks. In contrast, Direxion's ETFs allow traders to express amplified directional views through a single, exchange-listed vehicle.



That convenience, however, should not be mistaken for reduced risk. Leveraged and inverse ETFs are designed to achieve their stated objectives on a daily basis. Over holding periods longer than one trading session, compounding effects can cause performance to diverge meaningfully from the cumulative return of the underlying index.



It also bears emphasizing that leverage magnifies outcomes in both directions. Gains can accumulate quickly when conditions align, but losses can be equally rapid when markets move against a position. For this reason, Direxion ETFs are generally intended for short-term exposure and active management rather than long-term holding.



The TNA ETF: Since the beginning of the year, the TNA ETF has gained almost 13%. However, the past six months have been quite robust, with the bull fund gaining 53%.



<ul>
<li>Technically, the price action for TNA stands on solid ground, trading above the 20-day exponential moving average and the 50 and 200 daily moving averages.</li>



<li>Generally, volume levels have stayed relatively stable, indicating consistent demand and providing some confidence for bullish speculators.</li>
</ul>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img width="1002" height="625" src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/19123153/image-375.png?x-oss-process=image/auto-orient,1/interlace,1/resize,w_1440,h_1440/quality,q_95/format,jpg" alt="" original-src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/19123153/image-375.png"/></figure>



The TZA ETF: One of the market's big underperformers, the TZZ ETF is down about 44% year-to-date. Interestingly, in the past five sessions, the bear fund is up over 10%.



<ul>
<li>In a mirror opposite to its counterpart, TZA's price action sits below the 50 and 200 DMAs, along with the 20-day EMAs.</li>



<li>What's fascinating, though, is that throughout the fourth quarter, accumulative volume has been steadily rising, potentially indicating a sentiment shift.</li>
</ul>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img width="1000" height="626" src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/19123153/image-375.png?x-oss-process=image/auto-orient,1/interlace,1/resize,w_1440,h_1440/quality,q_95/format,jpg" alt="" original-src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/19123153/image-375.png"/></figure>



Featured image from Shutterstock



This post contains sponsored content. This content is for informational purposes only and is not intended to be investing advice.

Direxion offers two ETFs, TNA and TZA, to capture opposing outcomes in the small-cap space. TNA seeks 300% of the Russell 2000's performance, while TZA targets 300% of the inverse. TNA has gained 13% YTD and 53% in the past six months, while TZA is down 44% YTD but up 10% in the past five sessions. These ETFs are intended for short-term exposure and active management.

Take On Small-Cap Dynamism With Direxion's Bull And Bear TNA, TZA ETFs