<div id="readability-page-1"><div><div><p>Author: Haotian; Source: X, @tmel0211</p><p>If you, like me, feel helpless about the anxiety surrounding the current market's prevalence of &#34;AI replacing creators,&#34; please believe me, this is not just a debate about tools, but a misalignment of cognitive dimensions. Because the vast majority of people's understanding of the relationship between &#34;creation&#34; and &#34;AI&#34; is fundamentally flawed.</p><p>They are still debating whether the amount of &#34;AI&#34; in an article determines its quality, completely ignoring the dramatic shift in underlying logic—<strong>we are experiencing a great migration from &#34;human consciousness&#34; to &#34;silicon-based carriers.&#34;</strong></p><p>If you are one of those people who &#34;turns pale at the mention of AI,&#34; I have no intention of offending you.</p><p>However, I must point out that this conservative mindset is causing you to miss out on the greatest opportunities of this era. Recently, Musk has shown almost insane incentives for creators on the X platform, with some single pieces of content even earning millions of dollars. Why? Is it because they have money to burn? Or is it simply to boost daily active users? If you only see this layer, you're looking too shallowly. Whether you're a classicist still typing away or a pioneer who's already mastered LLM, I hope you'll bookmark this article and take a few minutes to think deeply about it. This isn't just about writing; it's about your ultimate value as a &#34;human being&#34; in this algorithm-dominated future. This will be a profound demystification of the underlying logic of the content industry. What you're rejecting isn't AI, but the fear of your own mediocrity. In this market, people often fall into a binary misconception: either &#34;purely human&#34; craftsmanship or &#34;purely AI&#34; garbage. But this classification is untenable both commercially and logically. First, we must clarify a core axiom: Excellent content never asks about its source. When you're deeply moved by a profound article or struck by a brilliant analysis, do you care whether it was typed word by word by the author or polished by Notion AI? You don't. What you care about is information density, emotional resonance, and cognitive growth. In my view, creators using AI for creation is essentially just an &#34;efficiency improvement activity.&#34; This is no different in essence from switching from handwriting to typing, or from researching in libraries to using Google. Those who cling to the &#34;purely manual&#34; standard and derive a sense of superiority from it are often masking their inner anxieties. Subconsciously, they know that **if stripped of the halo of &#34;hard work,&#34; their output might not stand up to scrutiny in terms of intellectual depth.** If your thoughts are sharp enough, AI will merely be your exoskeleton, freeing you from tedious textual compilation to construct grander narratives; if your thoughts are barren, AI will indeed replace you, because it can generate ten thousand sentences of mediocre nonsense per second. Whether it was written by AI is not important; what matters is whether there is a &#34;human&#34; thinking behind it. The essence of creators: the greatest &#34;data labelers&#34; in the AI ​​era. If the first point was merely about tool iteration, then this point touches upon the crux of AI evolution. Let's redefine the ecological niche of &#34;creators&#34; in the AI ​​era. Many people think creators are competitors of AI; they are wrong. Creators are the highest-level &#34;data labelers&#34; in the AI ​​evolution chain, engineers who breathe life into raw data. Imagine how LLM (Large Language Model) works. It can learn all the academic papers, humorous novels, and hardcore code in human history in seconds. But to AI, these are merely a cold, probabilistic combination of tokens. AI understands syntax, but not the feeling of heartbreak; AI understands logic, but not the decisiveness of a desperate gamble. This is where the creator comes in. When you take the scattered materials generated by AI, and through your aesthetic sense, your values, and your experience, trim, reorganize, and polish them to create a vivid and compelling article, you are actually doing something truly remarkable: you are infusing silicon-based data with the &#34;soul and consciousness&#34; of carbon-based civilization. This act is essentially a high-level form of data labeling. Every revision you make, every adjustment to the punctuation for better phrasing, every addition for logical consistency—all of these tell the AI, &#34;Hey, this is the kind of expression humans truly like; this is 'human' thinking.&#34; Musk relentlessly motivates creators because he knows better than anyone that the real-time, vibrant content on Twitter, brimming with emotion and debate, is the most valuable &#34;sample of human consciousness&#34; for training Grok and future, more sophisticated AI. The Law of Entropy Increase: AI's Hunger and the Curse of Synthetic Data. This leads to a deeper business and technological paradox, and also why &#34;humans&#34; will remain irreplaceable in the future. Current large-scale AI models are already in a state of deep &#34;data hunger.&#34; High-quality public data on the internet is rapidly depleting. If humans stop creating, or creators leave en masse, what will AI eat next? It can only consume the data it produces itself. This is akin to inbreeding. If AI relies solely on self-synthetic data to sustain itself, its capabilities will not improve; instead, the accumulation of errors will lead to &#34;model collapse.&#34; It's like photocopying a document a thousand times—the result is only a blurry black-and-white mess of noise. This is clearly not the optimal solution, and may even be a fast track to a technological dead end. Therefore, the more widespread and powerful AI becomes, the more urgent its need for &#34;original&#34; and &#34;native&#34; human data becomes. It requires the emergence of creators, it requires people to experience real pain and real joy, and then transform these life experiences that AI cannot simulate into text, video, and audio. This data, containing human &#34;randomness,&#34; &#34;creativity,&#34; and &#34;emotional tension,&#34; is the only antidote to the entropy increase of AI systems. Finally, looking ahead: From &#34;Creators&#34; to &#34;World Builders&#34; So, back to the initial question. Why shouldn't we reject AI, but rather embrace it with extreme greed? Because the rules of the game have changed. In the old era, your ceiling depended on your typing speed and physical strength; in the AI ​​era, your ceiling depends only on your imagination and judgment. The top creators of the future will no longer be mere &#34;wordsmiths.&#34; They will evolve into &#34;World Builders.&#34; Your thoughts are the blueprints. AI is your construction team. And your work is the independent kingdom you build. Stop worrying about how much &#34;AI flavor&#34; is in your content; that's just part of the process. Think about how to use AI to amplify the density of your thoughts, how to leave a vivid sample of yourself as a unique individual within this algorithm-woven network. After all, in the torrent of silicon-based life, the most expensive offering we can provide is that tiny spark of &#34;humanity,&#34; unpredictable by algorithms.</p></div></div></div>

<p>The article discusses the evolving role of creators in the AI era, emphasizing that the debate is not about AI replacing human creativity but rather a misunderstanding of their relationship. It argues that creators are essential as they infuse AI-generated content with human emotion and insight, acting as high-level data labelers. The author critiques the binary view of content as either human or AI-generated, asserting that excellent content transcends its source. The piece highlights the opportunities for creators in leveraging AI to enhance their work, rather than fearing it.</p>

- The article argues that anxiety about AI replacing creators stems from a flawed understanding of the relationship between creation and technology.  
- It emphasizes that creators should see themselves as essential "data labelers" in an AI-driven era, enhancing AI outputs with human emotion and insight.  
- Ultimately, the piece encourages embracing AI as a tool to amplify creativity, asserting that the future of creation lies in the imaginative collaboration between humans and technology.

The Ultimate Deduction on the Value of Creators in the AI ​​Era

The Ultimate Deduction on the Value of Creators in the AI Era