@岩山之上 Your original intention is very firm, clear

@岩山之上 Your original intention is very firm, clear and kind! Salute to you!!! 🫡 Disputes, even slander and abuse, are obviously due to investors' lack of basic investment knowledge and experience, and even the necessary logical thinking and judgment ability, not to mention the blind following and FOMO caused by psychological fluctuations. This is a failure of our education, not your responsibility. Please relax. So, can we avoid such unnecessary trouble? Is it possible to present it in a neutral, systematic, professional and data-driven way without personal emotions, so as to achieve both a kind warning and a more professional self? If so, what indicators, explanations and framework should be considered? I think this is the direction that all the top earners on Longbridge and all investors who no longer want to be naive investors should work towards 🧭. It is also the mission of a responsible and visionary leader like you to lead the majority of investors on Longbridge to quickly transform from novices into a more professional investment group (obviously you have thought about it and done it, haven't you? Then, come on👏). Why can't we work together to create relatively rigorous, professional and non-emotional individual stock investment strategies? Why don't we discuss and design it together at this point in time? Instead of wasting time on meaningless personal emotional expression, why not think together about how to avoid the next mistake and risk control? Let me put forward some immature ideas: For example, 1. Someone needs to make systematic trading experience sharing and strategy guidance for individual stocks; 2. For the buying and selling behavior to be released, it is best to have clear information: a. Screenshot of the stock option order bought by the sharer (to help fans clarify the buying target and price range judgment); b. Selling tips (the sharer's expected profit target, stop-profit/stop-loss price range and selling reasons); c. Risk warning ⚠️ (gradually establish a scoring system through the discovered phenomena, measure the risk level through the score value, and continuously collect everyone's opinions through investor voting and other methods to improve this system, and gradually form a relatively standard indicator. Publish the value and the winning rate of the investment target instead of simple directional investment advice) 🤔 If you think it is necessary, then discuss it and give your reasonable suggestions, let's make money and big money without any trouble! What are you waiting for? ✅ I'm talking to you! Come and say something!!! 😊

岩山之上

$Strategy(MSTR.US)$Strategy(MSTR.US)Don't chase when overheated, don't panic sell when overcooled. Don't let emotions drag you into fantasies. When the fantasy bursts, it happens in an instant—no time to escape. Make trades with the highest probability of success, not the ones with the highest profit but also the highest risk. Lady Luck won't favor you forever.

I won't share my views anymore. If you understand, you'll cut losses less—at least that's a clear conscience. Long or short is your own business; differing opinions don't matter. Just a reminder to watch the risks. Would you lose on a short position at 440-450? No. If you chase at 440, will you profit? Maybe, but what if it doesn't rally? What's your profit margin? Isn't that licking blood off a blade? Really, I won't say more. It's my fault—I underestimated myself.

Heavy rain won't nourish rootless grass; the Dao is vast but only saves those destined.

When I say "short," longs might dislike me, but I go long too—just not at this stock's current price, where the risk is too high. Today was a black swan event—their chairman called for a short squeeze, hence the price action. But action doesn't change outcomes. A short position at 540 can't be squeezed—you can't forget Xiangyuan shorted at 540-545! If you go long and don't take profits in time, can you really escape? The drop is much faster than the rise. Sure, 390 to 440 was a big gain, but the safe bottom isn't 390—not even 320. If it crashes, it'll happen in an instant—just the time it takes for a few institutions to close profitable options. Five seconds? A minute? Can you escape?

A short at 440-450, with a little patience, is a can't-lose position. A "bottom-fishing" long is gambling for bagholders, not investing. That's why I warned about risks—I really don't want our people getting fleeced by foreigners. Just because you went long early and have profits doesn't mean you shouldn't take them. 300% is better than 200%; exiting at 540 beats 440. Hoping for a squeeze back to 550? Longs all hope. Hoping for a crash to 150? Shorts all hope. But why you? Longs dislike my bearish talk, but ask those who closed longs at 540. Maybe it's my personality—I'd rather miss gains than take losses. I rambled too much—won't happen again. I'll restrain myself, stay silent, and respect others' fate.