Options
Rate Of Return1. Oracle fell, not because data centers are worthless, but because it bears the most risk of "advancing money first and collecting payment later" in the AI supply chain.
2. Data centers are certainly a moat, but the moat mainly lies in "the difficulty of securing electricity and land," not automatically equating to "shareholders will definitely make a lot of money."
3. If OpenAI doesn't buy, other customers will likely buy a portion, but the price, speed, and terms will likely be inferior to the original model.
4. The key to data center valuation is not "scarcity," but "steady-state cash flow quality + customer credit + capex intensity + cost of capital."
from gpt 5.5
$Oracle(ORCL.US)
$Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF(ORCX.US)
While capex continues to climb,
CPU/GPU prices remain high,
Data centers are in short supply,
Energy supply is insufficient,
Logically, none of these links can be missing.
Why are chips and energy soaring to the sky, while Oracle keeps falling?
Data centers are capital-intensive and have long cycles. Does this count as a barrier?
Assuming OpenAI doesn't buy/fulfill the contract, will others buy?
What should the valuation logic for data centers be?
Come on, feed it to your large model and see what the opinion is.
The copyright of this article belongs to the original author/organization.
The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not reflect the stance of the platform. The content is intended for investment reference purposes only and shall not be considered as investment advice. Please contact us if you have any questions or suggestions regarding the content services provided by the platform.
