(The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.)
By Peter Thal Larsen
LONDON, Jan 18 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Welcome back! I’m dusting off my snow boots as I prepare to head to the World Economic Forum in Davos. Let me know what - if anything - you’re interested in hearing about. If you’re going to be in the Swiss mountains next week, get in touch. Was this newsletter forwarded to you? Sign up here to receive it free every Saturday.
<h3>OPENING LINE</h3>
“Jerome Powell, a devotee of the Grateful Dead, knows it costs a lot to win and even more to lose. One day after the passing of guitarist Bob Weir, the Federal Reserve head put this ethos into practice.” Read more: Trump’s imperial Fed push meets its Waterloo.
<h3>FIVE THINGS I LEARNED FROM BREAKINGVIEWS THIS WEEK</h3>
<ol>
<li>Taiwanese chipmaker TSMC plans to increase capital spending by 37% this year to $56 billion.</li>
<li>Local-currency debt issued by so-called frontier markets has tripled to $1 trillion in a decade.</li>
<li>Eli Lilly shares trade at twice the multiple of forward earnings of obesity rival Novo Nordisk.</li>
<li>Production delays have pushed the average age of commercial aircraft above 15 years.</li>
<li>Black-market cigarettes account for more than a quarter of Indian tobacco sales.</li>
</ol>
RISK AND RESOLVE One of this newsletter’s recurring themes is the extraordinary resilience of economies and financial markets in the face of geopolitical turmoil. Imagine if, at the beginning of 2025, investors had perfect foresight about everything happening in the next twelve months. They would have braced for a tariff-induced recession and sustained selloff - neither of which materialised. The U.S. economy probably expanded by around 2% last year, and the S&amp;P 500 Index ended 2025 up 16%. The disconnect has become even starker in the past two weeks. Donald Trump has arrested the president of Venezuela and started selling the country’s oil, undermined the transatlantic alliance by reviving his interest in Greenland, and advocated for a change of government in Iran. His administration then threatened Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell with a criminal indictment. The president has expressed his desire to cap credit card interest rates, impose a 25% tariff on countries that do business with Iran, and restrict defence contractors from returning cash to shareholders. Oh, and he threatened to send troops into U.S. cities.
Despite all this, investors have barely blinked. The S&amp;P 500 Index (.SPX) is up just over 1% this year, yields on 10-year U.S. government bonds (US10YT=TWEB) are pretty much unchanged, and the VIX index (.VIX) of stock market volatility remains low. Meanwhile speculators are piling into silver (XAG=) (up 24% this year) and bitcoin (BTC=) (up 9%).
There are three broad explanations. The first is that money managers think none of the things Trump is threatening will actually happen. Congress and the Supreme Court will restrain him, or he will back down when reality proves more complicated. Yet this theory doesn’t really hold up. For example, U.S. bank stocks sold off following Trump’s credit card comments, even though a cap would be hard to implement.
The second explanation is that none of this will meaningfully change the direction of inflation, interest rates, or corporate earnings. Venezuela produces less than a million barrels of oil a day, a rounding error in the global market. The stock market’s dependence on a small number of giant tech companies means its future is more tightly tied to the fate of artificial intelligence than to broader economic shifts. But this theory, too, has holes. It’s hard to conceive of a more consequential action for markets than the U.S. president bullying the central bank into lowering interest rates. Yet investors have shrugged off Trump’s assault on the Fed. The third explanation is that big shifts take time. They require investors to fundamentally rethink how and where to allocate assets. And few will talk about it publicly. It was therefore striking that Dan Ivascyn, the chief investment officer of Pimco, this week told the Financial Times that the giant bond fund manager is diversifying away from the United States. Sometimes the connection between different events is not as strong as we thought. Or it may just take time for the link to reveal itself.
CHART OF THE WEEK Wall Street banks often complain that they’re held back by excessive regulation, allowing less restrained rivals to push into trading or private credit. So it’s striking that both Morgan Stanley (MS.N) and Goldman Sachs (GS.N) now trade at a higher multiple of book value than in 2007, when the Global Financial Crisis kicked off. Yet as Stephen Gandel observes, their reported return on equity is still much lower than in those heady days.
THE WEEK IN PODCASTS In the Viewsroom this week, Rob Cyran and Yawen Chen joined Aimee Donnellan and Jonathan Guilford to discuss Donald Trump’s designs on Venezuela and Greenland, the fallout for the transatlantic alliance and the oil market. Over on The Big View, I talked inflation, artificial intelligence and investors’ buy-the-dip mentality with Anna Szymanski, Editor-in-Chief of Reuters Open Interest and co-host of Morning Bid, Reuters’ new daily markets podcast.
PARTING SHOT I was sad to hear that David Webb had died at the age of 60. Hong Kong’s most prominent corporate gadfly spent decades pursuing a lonely but important campaign for better transparency and against poor corporate governance in the Asian financial hub. His encyclopedic memory, clarity of thought, and strongly held views made him a valuable resource for other investors - and for financial journalists. Hudson Lockett’s obituary is a fitting tribute to the man, who would doubtless have appreciated its sharp conclusion. Want to receive The Week in Breakingviews in your inbox every Saturday? Sign up for the newsletter here. Follow Peter Thal Larsen on Bluesky and LinkedIn.
Wall Street titans have surpassed their former valuation glory
<img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://www.reuters.com/graphics/BRV-BRV/BRV-BRV/znpnqogyyvl/chart.png?x-oss-process=image/auto-orient,1/interlace,1/resize,w_1440,h_1440/quality,q_95/format,jpg" alt="" width="1420" height="920" original-src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://www.reuters.com/graphics/BRV-BRV/BRV-BRV/znpnqogyyvl/chart.png"/>
(Editing by George Hay; Production by Pranav Kiran)

The latest Breakingviews newsletter discusses various economic insights and market reactions amidst geopolitical tensions. Key highlights include TSMC's capital spending increase, the growth of local-currency debt in frontier markets, and the performance of Eli Lilly shares compared to Novo Nordisk. Despite significant political events, including Trump's actions, the S&P 500 remains stable, suggesting investors are either skeptical of the threats or believe they won't impact inflation or corporate earnings. The newsletter also notes Wall Street banks' higher trading multiples compared to pre-crisis levels, despite lower returns on equity.

- The article discusses the resilience of economies and financial markets amidst significant geopolitical events and political decisions in the U.S.  
- Despite numerous threats and actions from President Trump, the S&P 500 Index shows minimal reaction, indicative of investors' belief that these will not precipitate significant economic changes.  
- The author concludes that major financial shifts require time for investors to reassess asset allocations, exemplified by the actions of notable fund managers like Pimco diversifying away from the U.S. market.

BREAKINGVIEWS-The Week in Breakingviews: Darkness and light