Geopolitical conflicts continue to escalate, and Wall Street's optimistic expectations for a &#34;quick resolution&#34; are unraveling.
On Friday, Goldman Sachs' top trader Shawn Tuteja pointed out in the latest client report that the market narrative is undergoing a critical shift—from a firm belief that the conflict will quickly subside to pricing in &#34;indefinite continuation of uncertainty.&#34;
Tuteja noted that for the past few weeks, the mainstream narrative among Goldman Sachs' client base has been that the geopolitical conflict would be &#34;resolved,&#34; but as the situation drags on, this confidence is wavering. Last weekend, market sentiment shifted sharply, with clients beginning to heavily short low-quality stock portfolios and European assets while betting on rising oil prices. Meanwhile, the Federal Reserve's hawkish stance on Wednesday further suppressed risk sentiment—clients generally believe that the Fed had an opportunity to soothe the market but chose to focus on the strong economy, exacerbating bearish sentiment.
Currently, the S&amp;P 500 index has fallen about 5% from its historical peak and is roughly flat compared to six months ago. Tuteja believes that the current risk-reward has become more symmetrical than before, but he also warns that if the AI sector or momentum longs decline, the market will face tail risks that clients have not fully hedged.
<h2>Narrative Shift: From &#34;Quick Resolution&#34; to &#34;No Solution&#34;</h2>
Tuteja pointed out that in client conversations over the past few weeks, &#34;the conflict will be resolved&#34; was almost an overwhelming consensus, although clients often spoke vaguely about the path to resolution. However, as the situation drags on, the credibility of this narrative is being eroded.
Last weekend, there was a clear turning point in market sentiment. Clients began to worry that oil supplies would be in crisis within weeks, and that solutions might not arrive in time. This expectation drove massive shorting of low-quality stock portfolios (including the Russell 2000 index RTY and Goldman Sachs' low-quality stock basket GSXULOWQ) and new short positions in Europe.
Entering this week, the market's movements have also made bears uncomfortable—stocks rebounded without clear resolution signals, leaving fast-money clients who adjusted their positions caught in a bind. Tuteja described that the first four trading days of this week exhibited two-way flows, with sentiment clearly divided.
Currently, the client base has formed two distinctly different judgments about the market outlook: one, that the conflict will be resolved within one to two weeks; two, that the situation will become stagnant, and the market will digest this in two ways—either a sharp drop triggered by rapid deleveraging or a slow decline similar to 2022. The latter two pessimistic scenarios have been expressed through VIX call options, S&amp;P 500 tail put options, and VKO and other derivative tools.
In the face of uncertainty, funds are seeking a safety net. Goldman Sachs' client communications indicate that the consensus median for &#34;blindly buying&#34; the S&amp;P 500 index is in the range of 6100 to 6200, suggesting there is still a 6% to 7% downside from current levels.
<img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://wpimg-wscn.awtmt.com/039f9c3a-919e-4de2-bf46-28b641df3b58.png?x-oss-process=image/auto-orient,1/interlace,1/resize,w_1440,h_1440/quality,q_95/format,jpg" alt="" original-src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://wpimg-wscn.awtmt.com/039f9c3a-919e-4de2-bf46-28b641df3b58.png"/>
<h2>Federal Reserve's Hawkish Stance Intensifies Market Vulnerability</h2>
The Federal Reserve's statements on Wednesday became an additional suppressive factor this week. Tuteja pointed out that clients generally believed the Fed had an opportunity to release soothing signals amid the current turmoil, but its choice to emphasize the strength of the economy was interpreted by the market as a hawkish stance, further dampening risk sentiment.
In this context, the movements in the interest rate market are particularly noteworthy. At the beginning of the year, yields rose alongside the strength of cyclical stocks relative to defensive stocks, reflecting the market's expectations for an economic re-acceleration. However, this correlation has clearly broken down recently—while cyclical stocks have significantly underperformed defensive stocks, the market has instead priced in higher terminal rates and reduced expectations for interest rate cuts.
Tuteja views this &#34;sharp volatility in the bond market&#34; occurring against the backdrop of weaker non-farm payroll data and skepticism surrounding the AI narrative as a concentrated manifestation of cross-asset positioning vulnerability. He noted that the rapid switching in the interest rate market is likely a result of position-driven factors rather than a fundamental shift in the underlying economy.
<h2>AI Narrative Remains a Market Pillar, but Constitutes Potential Tail Risk</h2>
Despite market turbulence, the AI narrative remains intact. Goldman Sachs' proprietary trading data shows that AI-related positions are at historical highs, and the holdings of the Magnificent Seven (Mag7) are also close to historical peaks—as the market develops doubts about growth prospects, funds have refocused on these names.
From a relative performance perspective, Goldman Sachs' AI long basket GSTMTAIP relative to the S&amp;P 500 non-AI index SPXXAI is near historical highs, and the magnitude of past pullbacks has shown a trend of becoming shallower.
However, Tuteja views this highly concentrated AI position as a potential risk point. He noted that if one is looking for signals of a comprehensive market capitulation, the AI sector should be closely monitored—currently, it is clear that we have not yet reached that stage, but this indicates that clients are inadequately prepared for the downside risks of AI and momentum longs.
Goldman Sachs' proprietary trading data also shows that clients' overall exposure to momentum factors is at a five-year high. Tuteja suggests that the optimal hedging tool for tail risks is a combination of down options on GSTMTAIP and Goldman Sachs' mid-term momentum factor long basket GSX1BFML—the former's two-month 80/95% put spread costs about 2.62%, while the latter's same-term 75/90% put spread costs about 2.67%.
<h2>Valuation Contraction is Underway, Risk-Return Becoming Symmetrical</h2>
From a broader macro perspective, the S&amp;P 500 index has been essentially flat since mid-September last year, with a zero increase over the past six months. Goldman Sachs' research department maintains its earnings per share forecast of $309 for 2026 and $342 for 2027, believing that the impact of GDP growth rate downgrades will be offset by rising AI investment spending.
Tuteja pointed out that in the context of upward revisions to earnings expectations, the index's six-month stagnation essentially means that valuation multiples are contracting. Although U.S. stocks are still considered expensive by historical standards at the beginning of the year, the compression of the NTM price-to-earnings ratio over the past six months has been significant in the context of the past 45 years of historical data.
<img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://wpimg-wscn.awtmt.com/1f333988-e4be-4ee1-a6b2-1a1fe9e37115.png?x-oss-process=image/auto-orient,1/interlace,1/resize,w_1440,h_1440/quality,q_95/format,jpg" alt="" original-src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://wpimg-wscn.awtmt.com/1f333988-e4be-4ee1-a6b2-1a1fe9e37115.png"/>
In this context, Tuteja believes that the current risk-reward ratio has become more symmetrical compared to before. He stated that when the index is at a higher level, the market is hotly discussing &#34;how much increase can the ceasefire news bring&#34;; whereas at the current level, the upside potential has become more meaningful.
He summarized that at the net position level, clients have hedged against a slight decline in the stock market, thus they are not inclined to be overly bearish at the current position. However, he emphasized that clients are clearly unprepared for a decline driven by AI or momentum long positions, which is the tail risk that is most concerning in the current market

GS-C

GS-A

GS-D

Goldman Sachs' top trader Tuteja warns that the market has shifted to pricing "indefinite uncertainty"—clients are rushing to short low-quality stocks and European assets, and the Federal Reserve's hawkish stance adds to the woes. Currently, the risk-reward ratio in the U.S. stock market is becoming symmetrical, but AI positions are at historical peaks, and momentum long exposure has reached a five-year high. Once a collapse occurs, it may trigger tail risks

- Geopolitical tensions are eroding Wall Street's optimism for a quick resolution, as highlighted by Goldman Sachs trader Shawn Tuteja.  
- The market narrative has shifted from expecting a resolution to pricing in prolonged uncertainty, leading to significant short positions in low-quality stocks and European assets.  
- The Federal Reserve's hawkish stance further dampens risk sentiment, with investors seeking safety and indicating potential further declines in the S&P 500 index.

Market pricing is shifting from "rapid end of the war" to "spreading uncertainty"