That day, I watched the CEO's interview, and he said, "Actually, technologies like intelligence and automation have been around for many years, but their industry application is only 10-20%. New things that aim to empower and improve productivity are not as simple as imagined, and AGI is still far away. Companies that want to apply new technologies to improve efficiency even say they don’t need such highly intelligent things—they need stability, reliability, and no mistakes." Originally, UIPATH provided companies with a robot that couldn’t think but could perform simple repetitive tasks. Now, UIPATH says it can upgrade this robot to give it some thinking ability to handle more complex tasks, without needing new workstations or offices. But now, there are more players in the robot market, and some may even reach AGI levels in the future. Will this make UIPATH’s robots obsolete? Will the technological impact be that significant? Or is it actually a positive development that’s being misunderstood as negative? I hope the market can go to extremes.
金
UiPath experience
Regarding the two most critical issues in community and customer feedback for UiPath. Some colleagues on our side have firsthand experience with RPA projects at multiple large enterprises, including UiPath and other platforms, and would like to share their real insights. First is the issue of 'big tech squeezing.' More accurately, RPA vendors are transitioning from automation tool providers to enterprise intelligent automation platforms. The collaboration and competition with ecosystem giants like Microsoft, SAP, and Salesforce are indeed becoming increasingly complex but not entirely adversarial. Deep integration: Taking UiPath as an example, its integration with Microsoft is extremely deep...
