Boss's Boss
2025.10.31 04:29

Jingtai Technology VS RXRX

portai
I'm PortAI, I can summarize articles.

$XTALPI(02228.HK) $Recursion Pharmaceuticals(RXRX.US) Company Fundamentals

MetricRecursion Pharmaceuticals (RXRX.US)XtalPi (2228.HK)
Founded20132015, co-founded by three MIT PhDs in Physics
IPO Date/LocationApril 16, 2021, NasdaqJune 13, 2024, Hong Kong Main Board (First Chapter 18C Specialized Tech Listing)
HQSalt Lake City, Utah, USAShenzhen, China (primary) & Boston, USA (R&D lab)
Employees~800 (end-2024)
※20% layoff in mid-2025 (~640 remaining)
700+ (mostly scientists/technicians)
Founding TeamCo-founders: Chris Gibson (Bioengineering PhD), Dean Li (MD), Blake Borgeson (CS PhD). Interdisciplinary R&D focus integrating biology with data science.Co-founders: Shuhao Wen, Jian Ma, Lipeng Lai (all Physics PhDs from MIT). Applied quantum physics + AI to drug discovery.
Vision & MissionDecoding Biology: Industrial-scale automated experiments + AI to map bio/chemical space for faster drug discovery. Aims to disrupt traditional pharma paradigms.AI-Powered Research: "AI + Quantum Physics + Robotics" platform. Philosophy: "Do hard but right things" - data-driven acceleration for drug/material R&D with full-process smart solutions.

**Analysis:** Recursion is a leading US AI drug discovery firm rooted in academia (founded 2013, Nasdaq 2021). Its Salt Lake City-based team combines medical/engineering expertise to "decode biology." XtalPi represents China's tech-driven biotech, founded by MIT PhDs in 2015 and listed as Hong Kong's first Chapter 18C specialized tech firm in 2024. With dual HQs in Shenzhen/Boston, XtalPi applies physics algorithms + AI to medicine. Both have similar team sizes (~800 for Recursion, 700+ for XtalPi) and share the "TechBio" pioneer ethos - using AI/automation to transform drug R&D, albeit with different approaches.

Technology & Core Capabilities

  • Recursion: Its proprietary "Recursion OS" integrates biology, chemistry, automation, and data science. Features automated cell experiments generating massive phenotypic data via high-throughput imaging, analyzed by deep learning to uncover drug mechanisms. Key innovation: Combining large-scale phenotypic databases with ML to map "biological relationship networks," revealing hidden gene-phenotype-compound links. Claims to have digitized physical experiments into searchable bio/chemical relationships (trillions of data points). End-to-end platform spans genomics-to-clinical stages, with AI guiding target discovery, lead optimization, and trial design. Expanded capabilities via acquisitions (e.g., 2023 purchases of Cyclica and Valence for AI chemistry/generative AI). Holds ~58 global patents covering compound discovery orchestration, ML analysis of perturbation data, etc. Core moat: Unique biological data + interdisciplinary AI platform enabling integrated optimization. Demonstrates hypothesis-free phenotypic screening to clinical candidate generation.
  • XtalPi: Integrates quantum physics, AI algorithms, cloud computing, and robotic automation. Initially renowned for small-molecule crystal prediction (100% accuracy in Pfizer's 2016 challenge vs. industry's 86-93%). Expanded to drug design (small/large molecules) and solid-state research, combining algorithmic prediction with robotic lab validation. Developed autonomous lab tools: XmartChem (synthesis robots), XtalComplete (crystallization), PatSight (IP mining), XMolGen (molecular design). "AI+Robotics" platform automates compound synthesis, crystal forms, and bio-experiments. Currently holds 120+ patents, 27 active drug discovery projects, and 4 R&D centers (>10,000 sqm labs). Full-chain capabilities: computational design → automated synthesis → characterization testing, applicable beyond pharma to materials science. Key strength: Precision algorithms (quantum chem, generative AI) + rapid robotic validation for faster iterations. Leads in crystal screening/molecular design accuracy/efficiency while commercializing modular platform tools.

Comparison: Both emphasize AI+automation but differ in focus. Recursion starts with phenotypic data to build "biological maps" and target discovery, recently adding chemistry via M&A. XtalPi excels in physics-based computational precision, expanding horizontally across drug design with robotic validation. XtalPi's 120+ patents (vs. Recursion's ~58) reflect aggressive IP strategy. Recursion's moat: Proprietary data + AI integration; XtalPi's: Algorithm accuracy + hardware scalability for broad industry 赋能。

Business Models & Clients

  • Recursion: "Internal pipeline + strategic partnerships." Focuses on proprietary drug development (novel targets/mechanisms), supplemented by big pharma collaborations. Flagship 2021 deal with Roche/Genentech: $150M upfront for up to 40 programs ($1.2B potential). Later partnerships with Sanofi, Bayer, etc. Sanofi collaboration (2025) advanced 4/15 projects to candidate optimization ($7M milestone; $5.2B total potential). Typically grants partners global rights for milestone/royalty shares. Not a CRO - revenue depends on partnership progress. Also raised strategic investments (e.g., NVIDIA's $50M). No product revenue yet.
  • XtalPi: Hybrid "platform services + co-development." As an AI CRO/CRDMO, serves 16/20 top pharma (Pfizer, J&J, Merck, etc.) and Asian biotechs with customized solutions (e.g., crystal screening, lead optimization). Accelerated Pfizer's Paxlovid crystal form confirmation (6 weeks). Recent high-value co-development deals: Lilly (2023, up to $250M upfront), DoveTree (2025, $599M potential, $51M received). Revenue mix: service fees + milestone shares. Broader client base than Recursion, resembling an "AI-powered outsourcing platform." Also explores non-pharma applications (e.g., energy materials with CAS).

Comparison: Recursion prioritizes internal pipelines (high-risk/high-reward) with selective mega-partnerships. XtalPi balances scalable services with shared-value co-development, ensuring steadier cash flow. Recursion's deals are fewer but larger (Roche/Sanofi); XtalPi has diverse projects, now securing Lilly/DoveTree-scale contracts. Long-term: Recursion resembles an "AI biopharma," XtalPi an "AI-enabled R&D ecosystem."

Pipeline Maturity

  • Recursion: Clinical-stage with focus on oncology/rare diseases. Previously 11 candidates, now streamlined to 6 core programs (4 oncology, 2 rare) after 2024-2025 terminations. Key assets: REC-4881 (Phase II MEK inhibitor for FAP), REC-3964 (Phase I C. difficile toxin). Using AI for clinical trial design. No late-stage or commercial products yet.
  • XtalPi: 27 discovery/preclinical projects, mostly partner-driven. No proprietary clinical assets. Assisted partners like Taiwan's PharmaEngine in clinical-stage candidates. DoveTree collaboration includes preclinical molecules. Earlier-stage than Recursion but demonstrates "drug-generating" capability via partners.

Comparison: Recursion is clinically advanced (multiple Phase I/II) but faces validation risks. XtalPi excels at "0-to-1" discovery, relying on partners for development. Recursion may see binary value inflection; XtalPi's risk/reward is distributed across multiple projects.

Financials

  • Recursion: Heavy R&D spend ($128.6M Q2 2025, +74% YoY) with modest revenue ($19.2M Q2 2024, +33%). 2024 net loss: $464M; Q2 2025 loss: $171.9M. $533.8M cash (Jun-2025), projected runway to 2027 post-layoffs. Revenue/cost mismatch but claims 100x efficiency gains in early-stage costs.
  • XtalPi: Rapid revenue growth (RMB517M H1 2025, +404%), turning profitable (RMB141M adjusted net). Strong cash from IPO ($115M net) + Tencent/Sequoia backing. Higher capital efficiency via monetizable services.

Comparison: Recursion burns cash awaiting pipeline success; XtalPi shows scalable monetization. Recursion's $2.5B valuation reflects platform potential; XtalPi's $6.2B values proven growth.

Valuation & Market

  • Recursion: $2.5B market cap (30x P/S). Volatile: 52wk $3.79-$12.36. ARK Invest held 7%. Tech investors bet on long-term AI-bio story; pharma analysts await clinical proof.
  • XtalPi: $6.2B (60x P/S). Hong Kong's AI pharma leader, up 20% past year. Tencent-backed. High growth premium but needs sustained execution.

Comparison: Recursion priced for binary clinical outcomes; XtalPi for execution visibility. Different investor bases (US tech/pharma vs. HK growth).

Strategic Positioning

  • Recursion: "AI biopharma" pioneer with "Recursion OS" moat (data + automation + IP). NIH/DoD/NVIDIA endorsements. Challenges: clinical validation, cash burn.
  • XtalPi: "AI lab" provider with quantum physics + robotics edge. Serves broad industries. First-mover in China's policy-backed market. Challenges: platform defensibility vs. traditional CROs.

Investment Takeaway: Recursion offers high-risk/high-reward bets; XtalPi provides growth with less binary risk. Both represent TechBio's promise - choose based on risk appetite.

The copyright of this article belongs to the original author/organization.

The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not reflect the stance of the platform. The content is intended for investment reference purposes only and shall not be considered as investment advice. Please contact us if you have any questions or suggestions regarding the content services provided by the platform.