<p>英国高等法院命令自称比特币创始人的克雷格·赖特支付 154.8 万英镑的诉讼费用给播客主持人彼得·麦科马克，赖特曾起诉麦科马克诽谤。法院认定赖特的证词虚假，并仅赔偿麦科马克 1 英镑。这一裁决强调诉讼中的真实性至关重要，尤其是在加密货币行业的知名案件中。赖特现在受到全球冻结令的约束，以支付麦科马克的诉讼费用。</p>
<p>赖特长期声称自己是比特币的匿名发明者中本聪，他在 2016 年对 13 名比特币核心开发者提起诉讼，声称侵犯比特币白皮书和去中心化协议的版权。然而，赖特的主张遭到怀疑，有大量证据证明相反。代表被告的行业团体加密开放专利联盟（COPA）提供了至少 50 份证据，指控赖特伪造。</p>
<p>在法律斗争过程中，曾在推特和 YouTube 视频中指控赖特欺诈声称自己是中本聪的麦科马克成为赖特诽谤的法律诉讼目标。然而，高等法院最终裁定赖特不是中本聪。这一具有里程碑意义的裁决奠定了法律基础，免除了麦科马克诽谤赖特人格和获得法律赔偿的权利，为加密货币行业提供了一则警示。</p>
<p>赖特虚假主张的后果并未就此结束。在高等法院的裁决后，针对赖特资产的全球冻结令颁布，以帮助麦科马克收回近 200 万英镑的诉讼费用。这一命令提醒了在诉讼中做出虚假主张可能带来的潜在财务后果，尤其是在加密货币行业的知名案件中。</p>
<p>总之，克雷格·赖特诉彼得·麦科马克案的最新裁决提醒了加密货币行业中诉讼中真实性的重要性和虚假主张可能带来的潜在后果。随着行业的不断发展，对于所有当事方来说，以透明、诚信和对真相的承诺处理法律事务至关重要。</p>
<p>参考资料：</p>
<p>[1] Cointelegraph. (2022, July 5). United Kingdom High Court Freezes Craig Wright Assets Over Legal Fees. https://cointelegraph.com/news/united-kingdom-high-court-freezes-craig-wright-assets</p>
<p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://lh-prod-oper-pub-opercenter.s3.amazonaws.com/discovery-image/compress-191e3bd056538001.png?x-oss-process=image/auto-orient,1/interlace,1/resize,w_1440,h_1440/quality,q_95/format,jpg" alt="" original-src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://lh-prod-oper-pub-opercenter.s3.amazonaws.com/discovery-image/compress-191e3bd056538001.png"/></p>

GBTC

<p>克雷格·赖特声称自己是比特币创始人的谎言被英国高等法院判令支付 154.8 万英镑的法律费用给彼得·麦科马克。赖特的虚假声明和诽谤诉讼突显了加密货币行业中诚实的重要性。赖特现在受到全球冻结令的约束，以支付麦科马克的法律费用。这一裁决为该行业敲响了警钟</p>

<p>Dr. Craig Wright, who falsely claimed to be Bitcoin's founder, has been ordered by the UK High Court to pay £1.548 million in legal expenses to Peter McCormack, a podcaster he sued for defamation. The court found Wright's testimony false and awarded McCormack just £1 in damages. This ruling emphasizes the importance of truthfulness in litigation, especially in high-profile cases within the cryptocurrency industry. Wright is now subject to a Worldwide Freezing Order to cover McCormack's legal costs.</p>
<p>The cryptocurrency industry is known for its dynamic and often contentious landscape, and a recent ruling by the UK High Court serves as a stark reminder of the importance of truthfulness and the potential consequences of false claims in litigation. In a case that has garnered significant attention, computer scientist and businessman Craig Wright, who falsely claimed to be the founder of Bitcoin, has been ordered to pay £1.548 million in legal expenses to Peter McCormack, a podcast host he sued for defamation [1].</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>英国高等法院命令自称比特币创始人的克雷格·赖特支付 154.8 万英镑的诉讼费用给播客主持人彼得·麦科马克，赖特曾起诉麦科马克诽谤。法院认定赖特的证词虚假，并仅赔偿麦科马克 1 英镑。这一裁决强调诉讼中的真实性至关重要，尤其是在加密货币行业的知名案件中。赖特现在受到全球冻结令的约束，以支付麦科马克的诉讼费用。</p>
</div><p>Wright, who has long maintained that he is Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous inventor of Bitcoin, began his legal crusade by filing lawsuits against 13 Bitcoin Core developers in 2016, claiming copyright infringement on the Bitcoin white paper and certain features of the decentralized protocol [1]. Wright's claims, however, were met with skepticism and a mountain of evidence to the contrary. The Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA), an industry group representing several of the defendants, presented at least 50 pieces of evidence accusing Wright of forgery [1].</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>赖特长期声称自己是比特币的匿名发明者中本聪，他在 2016 年对 13 名比特币核心开发者提起诉讼，声称侵犯比特币白皮书和去中心化协议的版权。然而，赖特的主张遭到怀疑，有大量证据证明相反。代表被告的行业团体加密开放专利联盟（COPA）提供了至少 50 份证据，指控赖特伪造。</p>
</div><p>In the course of the legal battle, McCormack, who had accused Wright of fraudulently asserting his identity as Satoshi Nakamoto in several tweets and a YouTube video, became a target of Wright's legal action for defamation [1]. The High Court, however, ultimately ruled that Wright was not Satoshi Nakamoto [1]. This landmark ruling, which established the legal foundation absolving McCormack of defaming Wright's character and the right to legal compensation, serves as a cautionary tale in the crypto industry.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在法律斗争过程中，曾在推特和 YouTube 视频中指控赖特欺诈声称自己是中本聪的麦科马克成为赖特诽谤的法律诉讼目标。然而，高等法院最终裁定赖特不是中本聪。这一具有里程碑意义的裁决奠定了法律基础，免除了麦科马克诽谤赖特人格和获得法律赔偿的权利，为加密货币行业提供了一则警示。</p>
</div><p>The consequences of Wright's false claims have not ended there. Following the High Court's ruling, a Worldwide Freezing Order was issued against Wright's assets to help McCormack recover nearly £2 million in legal fees [1]. This order serves as a stark reminder of the potential financial repercussions of making false claims in litigation, especially in high-profile cases within the cryptocurrency industry.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>赖特虚假主张的后果并未就此结束。在高等法院的裁决后，针对赖特资产的全球冻结令颁布，以帮助麦科马克收回近 200 万英镑的诉讼费用。这一命令提醒了在诉讼中做出虚假主张可能带来的潜在财务后果，尤其是在加密货币行业的知名案件中。</p>
</div><p>In conclusion, the recent ruling in the Craig Wright vs. Peter McCormack case serves as a reminder of the importance of truthfulness and the potential consequences of false claims in litigation within the cryptocurrency industry. As the industry continues to evolve, it is crucial for all parties to approach legal matters with transparency, integrity, and a commitment to the truth.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>总之，克雷格·赖特诉彼得·麦科马克案的最新裁决提醒了加密货币行业中诉讼中真实性的重要性和虚假主张可能带来的潜在后果。随着行业的不断发展，对于所有当事方来说，以透明、诚信和对真相的承诺处理法律事务至关重要。</p>
</div><p>References:</p>
<p>[1] Cointelegraph. (2022, July 5). United Kingdom High Court Freezes Craig Wright Assets Over Legal Fees. https://cointelegraph.com/news/united-kingdom-high-court-freezes-craig-wright-assets</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>参考资料：</p>
<p>[1] Cointelegraph. (2022, July 5). United Kingdom High Court Freezes Craig Wright Assets Over Legal Fees. https://cointelegraph.com/news/united-kingdom-high-court-freezes-craig-wright-assets</p>
</div><p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://lh-prod-oper-pub-opercenter.s3.amazonaws.com/discovery-image/compress-191e3bd056538001.png" alt="" original-src="https://lh-prod-oper-pub-opercenter.s3.amazonaws.com/discovery-image/compress-191e3bd056538001.png"/></p>

克雷格·赖特因在英国法律战中虚假比特币声明被命令支付 154.8 万英镑