<p>Meta，这家背后拥有 Facebook、Instagram、WhatsApp 等平台的科技巨头，最近陷入了争议的中心——不仅因为首席执行官马克·扎克伯格对唐纳德·特朗普总统及某些 MAGA 理念的支持转变，还因为其在今年一月对被指控表现不佳的员工进行的激进清洗。</p>
<p>根据最近的一份报告，这些员工中的许多人在不知情的情况下被加入了 Meta 的非正式 “禁止再雇用” 名单。</p>
<p>公司实际上将一些前员工——其中一些有着良好业绩记录——列入黑名单的揭露，进一步加深了扎克伯格日益负面的声誉，使他不再是曾经的远见卓识的科技巨头，而更像是一个严厉的硅谷人物。</p>
<p>报告强调，即使是被现任高管重新招聘到关键岗位的前员工，也因这一有争议的做法而受到阻碍。</p>
<p>Meta 的有争议的禁止再雇用名单的一个典型例子是一位在 2022 年裁员中成为牺牲品的高级工程师，这是自 2020 年以来大规模裁减 35,600 个职位的一部分。</p>
<p>尽管在他四年的任期内获得了高度评价，但这位工程师在 Meta 内部申请的 20 多个职位的申请被突然拒绝，即使在招聘人员和招聘经理最初热情的回应之后。</p>
<p>当他询问态度突然变化的原因时，被告知 Meta 已将他标记为 “禁止再雇用”，因为他被列入了公司的前员工黑名单。</p>
<p>《商业内幕》（BI）报道：</p>
<blockquote>
<p>“前员工和经理确认，Meta 使用多个系统来跟踪再雇用不合格，包括 ‘非遗憾离职’ 的标记和 ‘禁止再雇用’ 的标记，尽管具体机制和受影响员工的数量仍不清楚。对五位来自不同部门的前员工的采访，以及 BI 查看的内部电子邮件和消息，揭示了多起被裁员工在申请新职位时发现自己被禁止重新加入 Meta 的情况，尽管他们在之前的工作中表现良好。”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>这一黑名单系统的揭露，虽然并非 Meta 独有，但由于其在公司内部的广泛影响而引起了重大关注。</p>
<blockquote>
<p>新消息：一些前员工发现很难在 Meta 重新被雇用，有时通过人力资源公司得知自己不合格。一些 Meta 的经理在尝试重新雇用前员工时也遇到了系统性障碍。 https://t.co/lbOqUtEUaC</p>
<p>— ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ (@PranavDixit) 2025 年 3 月 5 日</p>
</blockquote>
<p>这一披露恰逢扎克伯格在一月宣布裁员时，他称被解雇的 3,600 名员工为 “低绩效者”。</p>
<p>在他的声明中，扎克伯格还表达了希望改变 Meta 文化的愿望，强调一种庆祝 “攻击性” 和 “男性能量” 的新方向，这一立场与他之前的 MAGA 风格言论相呼应。</p>
<p>现在，世界看到了这种攻击性思维是如何通过隐秘的禁止雇用名单针对前员工的，为公司的日益严厉形象增添了另一层面。</p>
<p>许多前 Meta 员工震惊地发现自己被列入公司的禁止再雇用名单，尽管他们曾获得积极评价并保持良好的工作关系。</p>
<p>一些人承认，这种企业行为是他们最初犹豫重新申请的原因之一。</p>
<p>这位高级工程师说：</p>
<blockquote>
<p>“这是我工作过的最糟糕的公司。但他们的薪水也是最好的。如果我能再进去几年赚点钱，我会这么做。”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Meta 的禁止再雇用名单实际上使得这一选择变得不可能。</p>
<p>公司代表解释说，维护该名单的系统在员工离职处理过程中会自动将许多离职员工列入其中。</p>
<p>然而，一些高管承认，通常根据合法的工作相关问题或规则违规列出员工的做法常常被忽视。</p>
<p>在某些情况下，经理因个人原因，包括简单的不喜欢而将员工列入黑名单。</p>
<p>虽然这样的黑名单的存在可能看起来小气、报复性，并可能对职业生涯造成损害，但这并不违法。</p>
<blockquote>
<p>前 Meta 员工和现任高管表示，公司的正式禁止再雇用名单有时会因任意或琐碎的原因将有能力的老兵列入黑名单，这几乎是不可能克服的。 https://t.co/Tsuhd2NO7p</p>
<p>— Inc. (@Inc) 2025 年 3 月 7 日</p>
</blockquote>
<p>要使该系统违反反歧视法，它需要特别针对受保护类别的员工。</p>
<p>有趣的是，尽管禁止再雇用名单的常规使用似乎是 Meta 独有的，但轶事证据表明，这一做法比普遍认为的更为广泛。</p>
<p>谷歌前人力资源主管拉兹洛·博克承认，尽管这样的名单 “非常非常少见”，但在某些情况下确实存在。</p>
<p>Reddit 的 r/technology 子版块的用户对 Meta 的禁止再雇用名单的揭露反应冷淡，许多人声称曾遭遇过来自过去雇主的类似黑名单经历。</p>
<p>一些人分享说，他们在离职时被明确警告过禁令，提到的公司从一家大型家居改善连锁店到大型分销商不等。</p>
<p>其他用户则认为，这种做法可能比看起来更为普遍。</p>
<blockquote>
<p>有趣... “Meta 保留前员工的 ‘阻止’ 名单。Meta 的招聘经理有时会追求被裁员工的再雇用。” 我维护着一个客户的阻止名单。我认为任何公司都应该有保护措施。</p>
<p>— Amy Lynn (@AmyLynnOrg) 2025 年 3 月 6 日</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Reddit 用户 TheElusiveFox 写道：</p>
<blockquote>
<p>“很多公司都有 ‘禁止雇用名单’。它们的有效性因公司而异，但在大型公司中是有必要的。”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Travelerdude 表示赞同：</p>
<blockquote>
<p>“我曾在思科工作，他们不会重新雇佣员工，无论他们表现多么优秀，或者是自愿离职还是被解雇。通常被解雇是因为底层 5% 的离职政策，那么他们为什么还会重新雇佣呢。”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>一位评论者 PalebloodPervert 扩展了据称维护此类黑名单的公司名单：</p>
<blockquote>
<p>“还有谁呢？亚马逊、谷歌、微软等等。”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Meta 既没有确认也没有否认该名单的存在，但拒绝了因管理者的个人恩怨而随意添加前员工的说法。</p>
<p>Meta 在一份声明中表示：</p>
<blockquote>
<p>“对于被标记为不适合重新雇佣的员工，有明确的标准，这些标准适用于所有离职员工，并且在这个过程中有检查和平衡机制，以确保单个管理者不能单方面标记某人为不适合而没有支持。我们在离职时确定员工离职的原因——政策违规、绩效终止、自愿辞职等——以及离职前的最后评级和任何其他近期绩效信号，决定员工是否适合重新雇佣。”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>虽然社交媒体上的回应表明 Meta 并不是唯一使用此类名单的公司，但共识很明确：这种做法被广泛认为是不忠、阴险和报复性的。</p>
<p>因此，商业领袖应仔细重新考虑使用不再雇佣名单，权衡对当前和未来员工声誉的潜在长期风险。</p>

META

<p>Meta 正面临关于将前员工列入黑名单的指控，尽管他们的绩效评估是积极的，但仍被加入到一个非正式的 “禁止再雇佣” 名单中。报告详细说明了即使是重新被招聘的个人也被禁止返回的情况。首席执行官马克·扎克伯格最近关于裁员和公司文化的评论加剧了对 Meta 对待前员工方式的审查。虽然这种黑名单行为并不违法，但它引发了关于影响职业生涯的任意决定的担忧。这个问题反映了企业实践中的一个更广泛趋势， anecdotal evidence 表明其他公司也有类似的经历</p>

<p>Meta, the tech giant behind Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and other platforms, has recently found itself at the center of controversy—not only for CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s shift in support toward President Donald Trump and certain MAGA ideals, but also for its aggressive purge of alleged underperforming employees this past January.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Meta，这家背后拥有 Facebook、Instagram、WhatsApp 等平台的科技巨头，最近陷入了争议的中心——不仅因为首席执行官马克·扎克伯格对唐纳德·特朗普总统及某些 MAGA 理念的支持转变，还因为其在今年一月对被指控表现不佳的员工进行的激进清洗。</p>
</div><p>Many of these individuals, according to a recent report, have unknowingly been added to Meta’s unofficial &#34;no-rehire&#34; list.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>根据最近的一份报告，这些员工中的许多人在不知情的情况下被加入了 Meta 的非正式 “禁止再雇用” 名单。</p>
</div><p>The revelation that the company effectively blacklists former employees—some with strong track records—adds to Zuckerberg’s increasingly negative reputation, casting him less as the once-visionary tech mogul and more as a harsh Silicon Valley figure.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>公司实际上将一些前员工——其中一些有着良好业绩记录——列入黑名单的揭露，进一步加深了扎克伯格日益负面的声誉，使他不再是曾经的远见卓识的科技巨头，而更像是一个严厉的硅谷人物。</p>
</div><p>The report highlights how even former employees, re-recruited by current executives for key roles, are blocked due to this controversial practice.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>报告强调，即使是被现任高管重新招聘到关键岗位的前员工，也因这一有争议的做法而受到阻碍。</p>
</div><p>A prime example of Meta's controversial no-rehire list is a senior engineer who became a casualty of the company’s 2022 layoff, part of the larger reduction of 35,600 jobs since 2020.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Meta 的有争议的禁止再雇用名单的一个典型例子是一位在 2022 年裁员中成为牺牲品的高级工程师，这是自 2020 年以来大规模裁减 35,600 个职位的一部分。</p>
</div><p>Despite receiving glowing reviews during his four-year tenure, the engineer’s applications for over 20 positions within Meta were abruptly rejected, even after initial enthusiastic responses from recruiters and hiring managers.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>尽管在他四年的任期内获得了高度评价，但这位工程师在 Meta 内部申请的 20 多个职位的申请被突然拒绝，即使在招聘人员和招聘经理最初热情的回应之后。</p>
</div><p>When he inquired about the sudden change in attitude, he was informed that Meta had marked him as “ineligible for rehire” due to being placed on the company’s blacklist of former employees.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>当他询问态度突然变化的原因时，被告知 Meta 已将他标记为 “禁止再雇用”，因为他被列入了公司的前员工黑名单。</p>
</div><p>Business Insider (BI) reported that:</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>《商业内幕》（BI）报道：</p>
</div><blockquote>
<p>“(F) ormer employees and managers confirmed that Meta uses multiple systems to track rehire ineligibility, including a ‘non-regrettable attrition” designation and a “do not rehire” flag, though the exact mechanisms and number of affected employees remain unclear. Interviews with five former employees across different divisions, along with internal emails and messages viewed by BI, revealed multiple instances of workers who were laid off and discovered they were barred from rejoining Meta after applying for new positions at the company despite good performance records in their previous stints.”</p>
</blockquote>
<div class="lb-trans"><blockquote>
<p>“前员工和经理确认，Meta 使用多个系统来跟踪再雇用不合格，包括 ‘非遗憾离职’ 的标记和 ‘禁止再雇用’ 的标记，尽管具体机制和受影响员工的数量仍不清楚。对五位来自不同部门的前员工的采访，以及 BI 查看的内部电子邮件和消息，揭示了多起被裁员工在申请新职位时发现自己被禁止重新加入 Meta 的情况，尽管他们在之前的工作中表现良好。”</p>
</blockquote>
</div><p>The revelation of this blacklisting system, while not unique to Meta, has drawn significant attention due to its widespread impact within the company.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>这一黑名单系统的揭露，虽然并非 Meta 独有，但由于其在公司内部的广泛影响而引起了重大关注。</p>
</div><blockquote>
<p>New: Some former staffers are finding it tough to get rehired at Meta, sometimes finding out about their ineligibility through staffing agencies. Some managers at Meta are also running into systemic barriers trying to rehire former employees. https://t.co/lbOqUtEUaC</p>
<p>— ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ (@PranavDixit) March 5, 2025</p>
</blockquote>
<div class="lb-trans"><blockquote>
<p>新消息：一些前员工发现很难在 Meta 重新被雇用，有时通过人力资源公司得知自己不合格。一些 Meta 的经理在尝试重新雇用前员工时也遇到了系统性障碍。 https://t.co/lbOqUtEUaC</p>
<p>— ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ (@PranavDixit) 2025 年 3 月 5 日</p>
</blockquote>
</div><p>This disclosure comes on the heels of Zuckerberg's January announcement about the layoffs, where he referred to the 3,600 employees let go as &#34;low performers.&#34;</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>这一披露恰逢扎克伯格在一月宣布裁员时，他称被解雇的 3,600 名员工为 “低绩效者”。</p>
</div><p>In his statements, Zuckerberg also expressed a desire to shift Meta’s culture, emphasizing a new direction that celebrates “aggression” and “masculine energy,” a stance that resonates with his previous MAGA-style rhetoric.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在他的声明中，扎克伯格还表达了希望改变 Meta 文化的愿望，强调一种庆祝 “攻击性” 和 “男性能量” 的新方向，这一立场与他之前的 MAGA 风格言论相呼应。</p>
</div><p>Now, the world sees how that aggressive mindset was directed at ex-employees through a covert no-hire list, adding another layer to the company's increasingly harsh image.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>现在，世界看到了这种攻击性思维是如何通过隐秘的禁止雇用名单针对前员工的，为公司的日益严厉形象增添了另一层面。</p>
</div><p>Many former Meta employees were shocked to discover they had been placed on the company’s no-rehire list, despite having received positive reviews and maintaining strong work relationships.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>许多前 Meta 员工震惊地发现自己被列入公司的禁止再雇用名单，尽管他们曾获得积极评价并保持良好的工作关系。</p>
</div><p>Some admitted that this type of corporate behaviour was one of the reasons they had been hesitant to reapply in the first place.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>一些人承认，这种企业行为是他们最初犹豫重新申请的原因之一。</p>
</div><p>The senior engineer said:</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>这位高级工程师说：</p>
</div><blockquote>
<p>“It’s the worst company I’ve ever worked for. But they also pay the best. If I could get in there for a couple more years and make bank, I would do it.”</p>
</blockquote>
<div class="lb-trans"><blockquote>
<p>“这是我工作过的最糟糕的公司。但他们的薪水也是最好的。如果我能再进去几年赚点钱，我会这么做。”</p>
</blockquote>
</div><p>Meta’s no-rehire list effectively renders that option impossible.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Meta 的禁止再雇用名单实际上使得这一选择变得不可能。</p>
</div><p>Company representatives explained that the system for maintaining the list automatically places many departing employees on it during exit processing.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>公司代表解释说，维护该名单的系统在员工离职处理过程中会自动将许多离职员工列入其中。</p>
</div><p>However, some executives acknowledged that the usual practice of listing employees based on legitimate work-related issues or rule violations was often disregarded.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>然而，一些高管承认，通常根据合法的工作相关问题或规则违规列出员工的做法常常被忽视。</p>
</div><p>In some cases, managers had blacklisted employees for personal reasons, including simple disliking.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在某些情况下，经理因个人原因，包括简单的不喜欢而将员工列入黑名单。</p>
</div><p>While the existence of such a blacklist may seem petty, vindictive, and potentially damaging to careers, it is not illegal.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>虽然这样的黑名单的存在可能看起来小气、报复性，并可能对职业生涯造成损害，但这并不违法。</p>
</div><blockquote>
<p>Former Meta staff and current executives say the company’s formal no-rehire list sometimes blackballs capable veterans for arbitrary or petty reasons that are virtually impossible to overcome. https://t.co/Tsuhd2NO7p</p>
<p>— Inc. (@Inc) March 7, 2025</p>
</blockquote>
<div class="lb-trans"><blockquote>
<p>前 Meta 员工和现任高管表示，公司的正式禁止再雇用名单有时会因任意或琐碎的原因将有能力的老兵列入黑名单，这几乎是不可能克服的。 https://t.co/Tsuhd2NO7p</p>
<p>— Inc. (@Inc) 2025 年 3 月 7 日</p>
</blockquote>
</div><p>For the system to violate anti-discrimination laws, it would need to specifically target protected categories of employees.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>要使该系统违反反歧视法，它需要特别针对受保护类别的员工。</p>
</div><p>Interestingly, while the routine use of no-rehire lists may seem unique to Meta, anecdotal evidence suggests that this practice is more widespread than commonly believed.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>有趣的是，尽管禁止再雇用名单的常规使用似乎是 Meta 独有的，但轶事证据表明，这一做法比普遍认为的更为广泛。</p>
</div><p>Laszlo Bock, former head of people operations at Google, acknowledged that while such lists are &#34;very, very rare,&#34; they do exist in certain cases.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>谷歌前人力资源主管拉兹洛·博克承认，尽管这样的名单 “非常非常少见”，但在某些情况下确实存在。</p>
</div><p>Redditors in the r/technology subreddit reacted with indifference to the revelation about Meta’s no-rehire list, with many claiming to have faced similar blacklisting experiences from past employers.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Reddit 的 r/technology 子版块的用户对 Meta 的禁止再雇用名单的揭露反应冷淡，许多人声称曾遭遇过来自过去雇主的类似黑名单经历。</p>
</div><p>Some shared that they were explicitly warned about the ban when leaving, citing companies ranging from a major home improvement chain to large distributors.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>一些人分享说，他们在离职时被明确警告过禁令，提到的公司从一家大型家居改善连锁店到大型分销商不等。</p>
</div><p>Other users argued that this practice may be more widespread than it appears.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>其他用户则认为，这种做法可能比看起来更为普遍。</p>
</div><blockquote>
<p>Interesting... &#34;Meta keeps “block” lists of ex-employees. Hiring managers at Meta sometimes pursue laid-off workers for rehire.&#34; I maintain a block list of clients. I would think any company would have protections in place.</p>
<p>— Amy Lynn (@AmyLynnOrg) March 6, 2025</p>
</blockquote>
<div class="lb-trans"><blockquote>
<p>有趣... “Meta 保留前员工的 ‘阻止’ 名单。Meta 的招聘经理有时会追求被裁员工的再雇用。” 我维护着一个客户的阻止名单。我认为任何公司都应该有保护措施。</p>
<p>— Amy Lynn (@AmyLynnOrg) 2025 年 3 月 6 日</p>
</blockquote>
</div><p>Redditor TheElusiveFox wrote:</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Reddit 用户 TheElusiveFox 写道：</p>
</div><blockquote>
<p>“Lots of companies have ‘do not hire lists.’ How useful they are is different from company to company, but they are kind of necessary, especially in large companies.”</p>
</blockquote>
<div class="lb-trans"><blockquote>
<p>“很多公司都有 ‘禁止雇用名单’。它们的有效性因公司而异，但在大型公司中是有必要的。”</p>
</blockquote>
</div><p>Travelerdude concurred:</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Travelerdude 表示赞同：</p>
</div><blockquote>
<p>“I worked for Cisco and they don’t rehire employees no matter how good they are or if they left on their own accord or were let go. Usually when they’re let go it is the bottom 5% attrition policy so then why would they rehire.”</p>
</blockquote>
<div class="lb-trans"><blockquote>
<p>“我曾在思科工作，他们不会重新雇佣员工，无论他们表现多么优秀，或者是自愿离职还是被解雇。通常被解雇是因为底层 5% 的离职政策，那么他们为什么还会重新雇佣呢。”</p>
</blockquote>
</div><p>One commenter, PalebloodPervert, expanded the list of companies allegedly maintaining such blacklists:</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>一位评论者 PalebloodPervert 扩展了据称维护此类黑名单的公司名单：</p>
</div><blockquote>
<p>“Guess who else. Amazon, Google, Microsoft, etc.”</p>
</blockquote>
<div class="lb-trans"><blockquote>
<p>“还有谁呢？亚马逊、谷歌、微软等等。”</p>
</blockquote>
</div><p>Meta neither confirmed nor denied the existence of the list but rejected the notion that ex-employees were arbitrarily added due to personal vendettas from managers.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Meta 既没有确认也没有否认该名单的存在，但拒绝了因管理者的个人恩怨而随意添加前员工的说法。</p>
</div><p>Meta said in a statement:</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Meta 在一份声明中表示：</p>
</div><blockquote>
<p>“There are clear criteria for when someone is marked ineligible for rehire that are applied to all departing employees and there are checks and balances in the process so that a single manager cannot unilaterally tag someone ineligible without support. We determine, at the time of separation, the reason for the employee’s departure – policy violation, performance termination, voluntary resignation, etc. – and that, along with the last rating prior to separation and any other recent performance signals, determines whether an employee is eligible for rehire or not.”</p>
</blockquote>
<div class="lb-trans"><blockquote>
<p>“对于被标记为不适合重新雇佣的员工，有明确的标准，这些标准适用于所有离职员工，并且在这个过程中有检查和平衡机制，以确保单个管理者不能单方面标记某人为不适合而没有支持。我们在离职时确定员工离职的原因——政策违规、绩效终止、自愿辞职等——以及离职前的最后评级和任何其他近期绩效信号，决定员工是否适合重新雇佣。”</p>
</blockquote>
</div><p>While responses on social media suggested that Meta is not alone in using such lists, the consensus was clear: the practice is widely regarded as disloyal, underhanded, and vindictive.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>虽然社交媒体上的回应表明 Meta 并不是唯一使用此类名单的公司，但共识很明确：这种做法被广泛认为是不忠、阴险和报复性的。</p>
</div><p>For this reason, business leaders should carefully reconsider the use of no-rehire lists, weighing the potential long-term risks to their reputation among current and future employees.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>因此，商业领袖应仔细重新考虑使用不再雇佣名单，权衡对当前和未来员工声誉的潜在长期风险。</p>
</div>

Meta Under Fire Again as Allegations of Blacklisting Former Workers Come Hot on its Heels

- Meta 因 CEO 扎克伯格的支持转变及裁员引发争议。  
- 公司被指存在 “禁止再雇” 名单，影响前员工再就业。  
- 此做法引发对公司文化和管理方式的广泛批评。  

Meta 再次受到抨击，因被指控将前员工列入黑名单而面临新的指责