<p>特朗普政府将针对 DOGE 削减和跨性别问题</p><p>特朗普官员 “在每个案件中” 重返地区法院</p><p>民主党总检察长在最高法院裁决中看到有限的范围</p><p>作者：杰夫·梅森，丹尼尔·维斯纳和内特·雷蒙德</p><p>华盛顿，7 月 1 日（路透社）——美国总统唐纳德·特朗普的团队正在迅速挑战阻碍其社会政策和解雇联邦员工实施的禁令，此前最高法院限制了下级法院阻止这些政策的权力。</p><p>周五的裁决被广泛视为总统的胜利，因为它将权力从司法部门转移到了行政部门。但特朗普的对手表示，他们仍然有法律途径来阻碍他的议程。</p><p>一位白宫官员告诉路透社，政府正在立即返回下级法院寻求变更，引用由政府效率部（DOGE）推动的联邦机构裁员作为一个被禁令阻止的首要优先事项的例子。</p><p>该官员补充说，DOGE 和政府效率对总统来说 “极其重要”。</p><p>自 1 月上任以来，特朗普共和党人一直试图通过减少联邦劳动力、实施更严格的移民规则以及削减他不喜欢的公共和私营部门项目的资金来重塑美国社会。下级法院通过发布全国性禁令阻碍了这些努力。</p><p>最高法院的裁决将大大停止这种做法，使特朗普感到满意。</p><p>在周五的白宫新闻发布会上，总统列出了改革出生公民权、停止对庇护城市的资金、暂停难民安置以及停止与性别转变相关的纳税人资助手术作为他在最高法院行动后的首要目标。</p><p>“多亏了这个决定，我们现在可以迅速申请继续推进许多被错误地全国性禁令的政策，” 他说。</p><p>战略家们表示，他们预计特朗普将继续推进右倾的社会议程，包括消除多样性、公平和包容性项目，以及限制对跨性别青少年的护理。</p><p>“我预计白宫会利用这一点，在他们认为公众强烈支持的文化问题上更加激进：移民、性别认同和 DEI，” 佛罗里达州的共和党前国会议员卡洛斯·库尔贝洛说。</p><h3>仍然存在的选项</h3><p>最高法院周五批准了特朗普政府的请求，以缩小联邦法官发布的三项所谓 “普遍” 禁令的范围。</p><p>但挑战特朗普削减开支、加大驱逐力度和限制跨性别青少年治疗的民主党州检察长和团体表示，尽管这一决定令人失望，但并未阻止他们获得任何全国性裁决。</p><p>该裁决仍允许在某些情况下发布全国性禁令，包括代表一群人提起的一些集体诉讼案件。它还允许下级法院在违反管理法的情况下全国性地推翻行动，管理法规范联邦机构的工作。</p><p>华盛顿州检察长尼克·布朗预测，该决定对民主党主导的各州在挑战特朗普议程的案件中已经赢得的各种裁决影响有限，他表示：“我们只要求并获得了少数几个全国性禁令。”</p><p>在最高法院裁决几个小时后，挑战特朗普出生公民权命令的两起不同诉讼的律师抓住这一机会，寻求将他们的案件视为涵盖那些如果特朗普的命令生效将被拒绝公民身份的儿童的集体诉讼。</p><p>对最高法院裁决的初步反应反映了对其范围的广泛误解，诺曼·艾森表示，他是一名参与挑战特朗普多项政策（包括取消出生公民权）的律师。</p><p>“法院为使用其他途径发布全国性命令留下了空间，” 艾森说。</p><p>其他人表示，该决定将阻止 “论坛购物”，即原告在他们认为更可能迅速获胜的法院提起诉讼，并允许更多政策在面临法律挑战时得以实施。</p><p>“通常在这些高度政治化的诉讼中，有人希望立即获得救济。这不再可用，” 德克萨斯州前总检察长贾德·斯通说，他在 2021 年至 2023 年期间代表共和党主导的州挑战拜登政府的政策。“这是对普遍救济的重大削减。”</p>

特朗普媒体科技集团

<p>特朗普政府计划在最高法院裁决之后推进其社会议程和联邦劳动力削减，该裁决限制了下级法院对其政策发布全国性禁令的能力。这一裁决被视为特朗普的胜利，使他能够推进诸如削减联邦职位、加强移民规则以及限制跨性别医疗保健等倡议。尽管民主党检察长计划继续进行法律挑战，但该裁决缩小了他们阻止特朗普议程的选择。政府旨在积极实施其政策，特别是在移民和性别认同问题上</p>

<p>Trump administration to target DOGE cuts, transgender issues</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>特朗普政府将针对 DOGE 削减和跨性别问题</p>
</div><p>Trump officials going back to district courts “in each case”</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>特朗普官员 “在每个案件中” 重返地区法院</p>
</div><p>Democratic AGs see limited scope in Supreme Court ruling</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>民主党总检察长在最高法院裁决中看到有限的范围</p>
</div><p>By Jeff Mason, Daniel Wiessner and Nate Raymond</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>作者：杰夫·梅森，丹尼尔·维斯纳和内特·雷蒙德</p>
</div><p>WASHINGTON, July 1 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump’s team is moving quickly to challenge injunctions that thwarted implementation of his policies on social issues and firing federal workers after the Supreme Court limited lower courts’ powers to block them.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>华盛顿，7 月 1 日（路透社）——美国总统唐纳德·特朗普的团队正在迅速挑战阻碍其社会政策和解雇联邦员工实施的禁令，此前最高法院限制了下级法院阻止这些政策的权力。</p>
</div><p>Friday’s ruling was widely viewed as a victory for the president because it shifted power from the judicial to the executive branch. But Trump opponents said they still have legal options to impede his agenda.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>周五的裁决被广泛视为总统的胜利，因为它将权力从司法部门转移到了行政部门。但特朗普的对手表示，他们仍然有法律途径来阻碍他的议程。</p>
</div><p>One White House official told Reuters the administration was moving immediately to go back to the lower level courts to seek changes, citing layoffs at federal agencies driven by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) as one example of a top priority that an injunction had blocked.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>一位白宫官员告诉路透社，政府正在立即返回下级法院寻求变更，引用由政府效率部（DOGE）推动的联邦机构裁员作为一个被禁令阻止的首要优先事项的例子。</p>
</div><p>DOGE and government efficiency were “extremely important” to the president, the official added.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>该官员补充说，DOGE 和政府效率对总统来说 “极其重要”。</p>
</div><p>Since coming into office in January, Republican Trump has sought to remake American society by enacting reductions in the federal workforce, harsher immigration rules and funding cuts to programs he does not like in both the public and private sectors. Lower courts have stymied those efforts in a number of areas by issuing nationwide injunctions to block them.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>自 1 月上任以来，特朗普共和党人一直试图通过减少联邦劳动力、实施更严格的移民规则以及削减他不喜欢的公共和私营部门项目的资金来重塑美国社会。下级法院通过发布全国性禁令阻碍了这些努力。</p>
</div><p>The Supreme Court’s ruling will largely put a stop to that practice, pleasing Trump.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>最高法院的裁决将大大停止这种做法，使特朗普感到满意。</p>
</div><p>During a press conference at the White House on Friday, the president listed overhauling birthright citizenship, ending funding for sanctuary cities, suspending resettlement of refugees and stopping taxpayer-funded surgeries related to gender transitions as his top goals after the Supreme Court’s move.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在周五的白宫新闻发布会上，总统列出了改革出生公民权、停止对庇护城市的资金、暂停难民安置以及停止与性别转变相关的纳税人资助手术作为他在最高法院行动后的首要目标。</p>
</div><p>“Thanks to this decision, we can now promptly file to proceed with numerous policies that have been wrongly enjoined on a nationwide basis,” he said.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“多亏了这个决定，我们现在可以迅速申请继续推进许多被错误地全国性禁令的政策，” 他说。</p>
</div><p>Strategists said they expected Trump to press forward with a right-leaning social agenda, including eliminating diversity, equity and inclusion programs and curbing care for transgender youth.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>战略家们表示，他们预计特朗普将继续推进右倾的社会议程，包括消除多样性、公平和包容性项目，以及限制对跨性别青少年的护理。</p>
</div><p>“I expect the White House to take advantage of this by being even more aggressive on the culture issues where they believe the public is strongly behind them: immigration, gender identity and DEI,” said Carlos Curbelo, a Republican former U.S. congressman from Florida.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“我预计白宫会利用这一点，在他们认为公众强烈支持的文化问题上更加激进：移民、性别认同和 DEI，” 佛罗里达州的共和党前国会议员卡洛斯·库尔贝洛说。</p>
</div><h3>OPTIONS STILL ON THE TABLE</h3>
<div class="lb-trans"><h3>仍然存在的选项</h3>
</div><p>The Supreme Court on Friday granted the Trump administration’s request to narrow the scope of three so-called “universal” injunctions issued by federal judges.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>最高法院周五批准了特朗普政府的请求，以缩小联邦法官发布的三项所谓 “普遍” 禁令的范围。</p>
</div><p>But Democratic state attorneys general and groups challenging Trump’s efforts to slash spending, ramp up deportations and restrict treatment for transgender youth said that while the decision was a disappointment, it did not bar them from obtaining any nationwide ruling.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>但挑战特朗普削减开支、加大驱逐力度和限制跨性别青少年治疗的民主党州检察长和团体表示，尽管这一决定令人失望，但并未阻止他们获得任何全国性裁决。</p>
</div><p>The ruling still allowed for nationwide injunctions in certain situations, including some class action cases brought on behalf of a group of people. It also allowed lower courts to strike down actions nationwide when they violate administrative law, which governs work by federal agencies.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>该裁决仍允许在某些情况下发布全国性禁令，包括代表一群人提起的一些集体诉讼案件。它还允许下级法院在违反管理法的情况下全国性地推翻行动，管理法规范联邦机构的工作。</p>
</div><p>Washington state Attorney General Nick Brown predicted the decision would have minimal impact on the various rulings Democratic-led states have already won in cases challenging Trump’s agenda, saying “it’s only been a small handful where we’ve asked and received nationwide injunctions.”</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>华盛顿州检察长尼克·布朗预测，该决定对民主党主导的各州在挑战特朗普议程的案件中已经赢得的各种裁决影响有限，他表示：“我们只要求并获得了少数几个全国性禁令。”</p>
</div><p>Just hours after the Supreme Court ruled, lawyers in two different lawsuits challenging Trump’s birthright citizenship order seized on that opening by seeking to have their cases treated as class actions covering children who would be denied citizenship if Trump’s order took effect.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在最高法院裁决几个小时后，挑战特朗普出生公民权命令的两起不同诉讼的律师抓住这一机会，寻求将他们的案件视为涵盖那些如果特朗普的命令生效将被拒绝公民身份的儿童的集体诉讼。</p>
</div><p>Initial reactions to the Supreme Court decision reflected a widespread misunderstanding of its scope, said Norman Eisen, a lawyer involved in challenges to several Trump policies, including the elimination of birthright citizenship.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>对最高法院裁决的初步反应反映了对其范围的广泛误解，诺曼·艾森表示，他是一名参与挑战特朗普多项政策（包括取消出生公民权）的律师。</p>
</div><p>“The court leaves a place for nationwide orders using other vehicles,” Eisen said.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“法院为使用其他途径发布全国性命令留下了空间，” 艾森说。</p>
</div><p>Others said the decision will deter “forum shopping,” in which plaintiffs file lawsuits in courts where they believe a quick win is more likely, and allow more policies to be implemented even as they are challenged in court.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>其他人表示，该决定将阻止 “论坛购物”，即原告在他们认为更可能迅速获胜的法院提起诉讼，并允许更多政策在面临法律挑战时得以实施。</p>
</div><p>“Usually in these highly politicized lawsuits, someone wants relief instantly. That’s no longer available,” said Judd Stone, who as the solicitor general of Texas from 2021 to 2023 represented the Republican-led state in challenges to Biden administration policies. “It’s a major, major paring back of universal relief.”</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“通常在这些高度政治化的诉讼中，有人希望立即获得救济。这不再可用，” 德克萨斯州前总检察长贾德·斯通说，他在 2021 年至 2023 年期间代表共和党主导的州挑战拜登政府的政策。“这是对普遍救济的重大削减。”</p>
</div>

Buoyed by the Supreme Court, Trump to press forward on firings and social agenda

- 特朗普政府迅速挑战阻碍其社会政策的禁令。  
- 最高法院裁定限制下级法院的权力，特朗普对此表示满意。  
- 民主党检察长称仍有法律途径阻止特朗普的议程。

在最高法院的支持下，特朗普将继续推进解雇和社会议程