<p>当特朗普总统前往阿拉斯加与俄罗斯总统普京举行重要会晤时，他似乎心中只有一件事——不是乌克兰的和平，而是和平奖的奖赏。</p>
<p>特朗普对获得诺贝尔和平奖的执念已经持续了一段时间。即使那些对总统没有怀疑的人也不得不承认，他结束冲突的外交政策举措更多是为了看起来像是他在结束这些冲突，而不是为了真正结束冲突。</p>
<p>我们将看到特朗普在阿拉斯加对普京提出什么要求，以及乌克兰总统泽伦斯基是否会有机会参与谈判。但我们知道，特朗普非常渴望结束战争，因为他认为如果他做到这一点，诺贝尔委员会就会找上他。</p>
<p>现在，有人可能会争辩，这有什么大不了的？如果特朗普想要这个奖项，并且这让他急于推动解决冲突的方案，那么也许他确实值得这个奖。是的，他可能是出于自私的动机，但最终，我们可以看到乌克兰、加沙、刚果民主共和国、南高加索和南亚等地的冲突结束。这有什么错呢？</p>
<p>好吧，如果这是一个出于恶意的和平，最终会破裂，那么这就有很多问题了。</p>
<p>允许俄罗斯保留其在入侵中夺取的领土，并迫使乌克兰接受，这并不促进和平。它鼓励战争。它让俄罗斯和普京声称他们入侵和夺取领土是正当的。这增强了他们对制裁和禁运的辩解，而这些制裁和禁运使他们成为世界的弃儿。这也会告诉他们，他们可以入侵其他地方（波罗的海国家、波兰、芬兰、中亚国家），夺取领土，然后在他们夺取所需的东西后提名特朗普获得和平奖。</p>
<p>世界领导人已经注意到，并用提名和平奖来调侃特朗普，只是为了让他急于按照他们的条件解决冲突。巴基斯坦和以色列都向特朗普提出了正式提名，尽管他与南亚的停火和加沙的战争没有任何关系。可以期待更多这样的情况。</p>
<p>与此同时，有一位麦凯恩在过去两年里一直在努力为世界各地的饥饿人口提供食物。</p>
<p>辛迪·麦凯恩一直担任联合国世界粮食计划署的执行主任，并一直倡导结束以色列对加沙人民的人道主义援助封锁。她与世界各地的官员会面，包括国务卿马尔科·鲁比奥，推动结束封锁。作为一名共和党人（即使有些人对此不满），麦凯恩在加沙人待遇问题上比许多民主党人更直言不讳。</p>
<p>麦凯恩之所以引人注目，是因为像许多高级政治任命者一样，她最初试图保持安全，不公开谈论巴勒斯坦人的困境。像美国和西欧的许多人一样，她可能觉得必须小心翼翼，以免冒犯以色列政府。她甚至因没有足够发声而受到自己员工的质疑。麦凯恩本可以选择保持安全，但她倾听了自己的员工和内心的声音，推动结束饥荒，不仅在加沙，还在非洲和世界其他地区。</p>
<p>现在，我们都知道她并不是唯一一个。世界中央厨房的创始人何塞·安德烈斯厨师可能更值得获得和平奖。他的组织在以色列空袭中失去了七名员工，帮助缓解了全球灾难、饥荒和战争的影响。</p>
<p>麦凯恩和安德烈斯之间的共同点——以及他们与特朗普的区别在于，他们的行动更有可能确保和平。无论走到哪里，人们只想要安全、食物、水和稳定。世界粮食计划署和世界中央厨房的目标正是如此。特朗普试图强迫停火，而没有解决冲突的根本原因，这意味着冲突最终将继续。</p>
<p>必须说，诺贝尔委员会可能对特朗普的政治手腕感到满意，因为他们只希望世界领导人停止争斗，即使根本问题没有得到解决。他们过去曾将诺贝尔和平奖颁给一些可疑的获奖者。亨利·基辛格、亚西尔·阿拉法特、伊扎克·拉宾和西蒙·佩雷斯都获得了该奖，尽管很难将 “和平” 这个词与他们的名字联系在一起。</p>
<p>奥巴马总统在他任期的早期就获得了该奖，仅仅是因为人们希望他能带来和平。他随后在几个穆斯林占多数的国家创下了无人机空袭的新纪录。而且，诺贝尔奖从未颁发给甘地，尽管他激励了许多诺贝尔奖得主追求和平。</p>
<p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://thehill.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/11/op2.png/query-dz02MDA?x-oss-process=image/auto-orient,1/interlace,1/resize,w_1440,h_1440/quality,q_95/format,jpg" alt="" original-src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://thehill.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/11/op2.png/query-dz02MDA"/></p>
<p>因此，我们不能假装这个奖项不是一个政治奖项。选择获奖者时确实存在很多偏见，围绕这个奖项总会有争议。</p>
<p>但诺贝尔委员会可以关注当前的冲突，并决定什么能确保世界的真正和平。如果是在强迫人们接受不公正与为儿童提供食物、努力为世界带来稳定以便和平能够繁荣之间做出选择，我认为答案是明确的。</p>
<p><em>乔斯·约瑟夫是一位已出版的作家，毕业于哈佛延伸学院和俄亥俄州立大学。他是一名曾在伊拉克服役的海军陆战队退伍军人。目前居住在加利福尼亚州阿纳海姆。</em></p>

CHEF

<p>这篇文章认为特朗普总统更关注赢得诺贝尔和平奖，而不是切实实现和平，特别是在乌克兰。文章将他自私的做法与辛迪·麦凯恩和厨师何塞·安德烈斯的 humanitarian efforts 进行了对比，他们正在积极努力减轻痛苦并促进稳定。文章指出，尽管特朗普寻求停火，但他未能解决冲突的根本原因，这可能导致进一步的暴力。文章呼吁人们认可那些真正促进和平的行动，而不是为了荣誉而进行的政治操弄</p>

<p>As President Trump heads to Alaska for his momentous meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin, he seems to have one thing on his mind — not peace in Ukraine, but a prize for peace.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>当特朗普总统前往阿拉斯加与俄罗斯总统普京举行重要会晤时，他似乎心中只有一件事——不是乌克兰的和平，而是和平奖的奖赏。</p>
</div><p>Trump has been obsessed with winning the Nobel Peace Prize for some time now. Even those not cynical about the president must concede that his foreign policy moves to end conflicts are less about ending the conflicts and more about looking like is the one ending them.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>特朗普对获得诺贝尔和平奖的执念已经持续了一段时间。即使那些对总统没有怀疑的人也不得不承认，他结束冲突的外交政策举措更多是为了看起来像是他在结束这些冲突，而不是为了真正结束冲突。</p>
</div><p>We will see what Trump demands of Putin in Alaska and if Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky will even have a seat at the table. But we do know that Trump is very keen to end the war because he thinks that the Nobel Committee will come calling if he does.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>我们将看到特朗普在阿拉斯加对普京提出什么要求，以及乌克兰总统泽伦斯基是否会有机会参与谈判。但我们知道，特朗普非常渴望结束战争，因为他认为如果他做到这一点，诺贝尔委员会就会找上他。</p>
</div><p>Now some might argue, what’s the big deal? If Trump wants the prize and it makes him eager to force solutions to end conflicts, then maybe he does deserve it. Yeah, he might be self-serving, but ultimately, we can see an end to conflicts in places like Ukraine, Gaza, the Democratic Republic of Congo, the Caucasus and South Asia. And what would be wrong with that?</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>现在，有人可能会争辩，这有什么大不了的？如果特朗普想要这个奖项，并且这让他急于推动解决冲突的方案，那么也许他确实值得这个奖。是的，他可能是出于自私的动机，但最终，我们可以看到乌克兰、加沙、刚果民主共和国、南高加索和南亚等地的冲突结束。这有什么错呢？</p>
</div><p>Well, if it’s a peace made in bad faith that will ultimately break apart, then there is a lot wrong with it.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>好吧，如果这是一个出于恶意的和平，最终会破裂，那么这就有很多问题了。</p>
</div><p>Allowing Russia to keep the territory it seized in its invasion and forcing Ukraine to go along with it, doesn’t promote peace. It encourages war. It lets Russia and Putin claim that they were justified to invade and take territory. It bolsters their arguments against the sanctions and embargoes that have made them the pariah of the world. And it would also tell them that they could invade other places (Baltic states, Poland, Finland, Central Asian states) take territory and just nominate Trump for a peace prize when he tells them to stop, after they have taken what they wanted.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>允许俄罗斯保留其在入侵中夺取的领土，并迫使乌克兰接受，这并不促进和平。它鼓励战争。它让俄罗斯和普京声称他们入侵和夺取领土是正当的。这增强了他们对制裁和禁运的辩解，而这些制裁和禁运使他们成为世界的弃儿。这也会告诉他们，他们可以入侵其他地方（波罗的海国家、波兰、芬兰、中亚国家），夺取领土，然后在他们夺取所需的东西后提名特朗普获得和平奖。</p>
</div><p>World leaders have noticed and teased Trump with nominations for the peace prize just to get him eager to settle conflicts on their terms. The Pakistanis and the Israelis have presented Trump with official nominations, even though he had nothing to do with the cessation of hostilities in South Asia and the war in Gaza. Expect to see more of this.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>世界领导人已经注意到，并用提名和平奖来调侃特朗普，只是为了让他急于按照他们的条件解决冲突。巴基斯坦和以色列都向特朗普提出了正式提名，尽管他与南亚的停火和加沙的战争没有任何关系。可以期待更多这样的情况。</p>
</div><p>Meanwhile, there is a McCain who has been working for the last two years to feed starving populations around the world.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>与此同时，有一位麦凯恩在过去两年里一直在努力为世界各地的饥饿人口提供食物。</p>
</div><p>Cindy McCain has been the executive director of the United Nations’ World Food Program and has been advocating for the end of the blockade of humanitarian aid by the Israelis on the people of Gaza. She has met with officials around the world, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio to push for the end of the blockade. A Republican (even if some people aren’t happy about it), McCain has been more outspoken about the treatment of Gazans than many Democrats.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>辛迪·麦凯恩一直担任联合国世界粮食计划署的执行主任，并一直倡导结束以色列对加沙人民的人道主义援助封锁。她与世界各地的官员会面，包括国务卿马尔科·鲁比奥，推动结束封锁。作为一名共和党人（即使有些人对此不满），麦凯恩在加沙人待遇问题上比许多民主党人更直言不讳。</p>
</div><p>What makes McCain interesting is that, like many high-level political appointees, she initially sought to play it safe and not overtly talk about the plight of the Palestinians. Like many in the U.S. and Western Europe, she probably felt she had to walk a fine line, so as to not insult the Israeli government. She was even confronted by her own staff for not having spoken out enough. McCain could have just played it safe, but she listened to her staff and her own heart and has pushed for the end to famine, not just in Gaza but in Africa and other parts of the world.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>麦凯恩之所以引人注目，是因为像许多高级政治任命者一样，她最初试图保持安全，不公开谈论巴勒斯坦人的困境。像美国和西欧的许多人一样，她可能觉得必须小心翼翼，以免冒犯以色列政府。她甚至因没有足够发声而受到自己员工的质疑。麦凯恩本可以选择保持安全，但她倾听了自己的员工和内心的声音，推动结束饥荒，不仅在加沙，还在非洲和世界其他地区。</p>
</div><p>Now, we all know she isn’t the only one. Chef José Andrés, the founder of the World Central Kitchen, may be even more deserving of the Peace Prize. His organization, which lost seven employees in an Israeli airstrike has helped mitigate the fallout from worldwide disasters, famines and wars.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>现在，我们都知道她并不是唯一一个。世界中央厨房的创始人何塞·安德烈斯厨师可能更值得获得和平奖。他的组织在以色列空袭中失去了七名员工，帮助缓解了全球灾难、饥荒和战争的影响。</p>
</div><p>The common denominator between McCain and Andrés — and what separates them from Trump — is that their actions are more likely to ensure peace. Go anywhere in the world and people just want to have security, food, water and stability. The aims of the World Food Program and the World Central Kitchen do just that. Trump is trying to force ceasefires without solving the underlying reasons for conflicts which means the conflicts will eventually go on.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>麦凯恩和安德烈斯之间的共同点——以及他们与特朗普的区别在于，他们的行动更有可能确保和平。无论走到哪里，人们只想要安全、食物、水和稳定。世界粮食计划署和世界中央厨房的目标正是如此。特朗普试图强迫停火，而没有解决冲突的根本原因，这意味着冲突最终将继续。</p>
</div><p>It must be said that the Nobel Committee can just be content with Trump’s politicking because they just want world leaders to just stop fighting, even if the underlying issues are not addressed. They have awarded the Nobel Peace Prize to dubious recipients in the past. Henry Kissinger, Yassir Arafat, Yitzak Rabin and Shimon Peres all got the award, even though it’s hard to attach the word peace to their names.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>必须说，诺贝尔委员会可能对特朗普的政治手腕感到满意，因为他们只希望世界领导人停止争斗，即使根本问题没有得到解决。他们过去曾将诺贝尔和平奖颁给一些可疑的获奖者。亨利·基辛格、亚西尔·阿拉法特、伊扎克·拉宾和西蒙·佩雷斯都获得了该奖，尽管很难将 “和平” 这个词与他们的名字联系在一起。</p>
</div><p>President Obama received the award early in his first term on the mere hope that he would bring peace. He went on to set new records with drone strikes in several Muslim-majority countries. And infamously, the Nobel was never awarded to Mahatma Gandhi, who inspired quite a few Nobel Laureates in their own quests for peace.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>奥巴马总统在他任期的早期就获得了该奖，仅仅是因为人们希望他能带来和平。他随后在几个穆斯林占多数的国家创下了无人机空袭的新纪录。而且，诺贝尔奖从未颁发给甘地，尽管他激励了许多诺贝尔奖得主追求和平。</p>
</div><p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://thehill.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/11/op2.png/query-dz02MDA" alt="" original-src="https://thehill.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/11/op2.png?w=600"/></p>
<p>So, we can’t pretend that the award isn’t a political award. There is definitely a lot of bias that comes to selecting the winner, and there will always be a controversy around the award.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>因此，我们不能假装这个奖项不是一个政治奖项。选择获奖者时确实存在很多偏见，围绕这个奖项总会有争议。</p>
</div><p>But the Nobel Committee can look at the current conflicts and decide what will ensure proper peace in the world. If it’s a choice between bullying people into accepting injustice, or feeding children and working to bring stability to the world so that peace can prosper, I think the answer is clear.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>但诺贝尔委员会可以关注当前的冲突，并决定什么能确保世界的真正和平。如果是在强迫人们接受不公正与为儿童提供食物、努力为世界带来稳定以便和平能够繁荣之间做出选择，我认为答案是明确的。</p>
</div><p><em>Jos Joseph is a published writer and is a graduate of the Harvard Extension School and Ohio State University. He is a Marine veteran who served in Iraq. He currently lives in Anaheim, Calif</em>.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><em>乔斯·约瑟夫是一位已出版的作家，毕业于哈佛延伸学院和俄亥俄州立大学。他是一名曾在伊拉克服役的海军陆战队退伍军人。目前居住在加利福尼亚州阿纳海姆。</em></p>
</div>

应该把诺贝尔和平奖颁给麦凯恩，而不是特朗普