<p>一项指控 <strong>苹果公司</strong>（NASDAQ:AAPL）在 iPhone 应用市场垄断的集体诉讼，涉及数百万客户，已被美国联邦法官撤销认证。</p>
<h2>法官称原告模型存在缺陷</h2>
<p>美国地区法官 Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers 撤销了她在 2024 年 2 月的先前集体认证裁决。该裁决允许在过去 17 年中在应用或应用内内容上花费 10 美元或更多的苹果账户持有者以集体身份提起诉讼，路透社报道。</p>
<p>该诉讼于 2011 年 12 月提起，涉及自 2008 年 7 月 10 日以来的 iOS 设备用户群体。</p>
<p>Rogers 撤销集体认证的决定是因为原告未能提供可靠的模型来证明集体伤害和损失。该决定是在一位苹果聘请的专家发现原告模型中存在重大错误后作出的，包括错误识别索赔人和支付记录分组不一致。</p>
<p>原告律师 <strong>Mark Rifkin</strong> 告诉路透社，他们对裁决感到失望，并正在评估下一步的法律措施。原告声称，苹果的垄断行为导致了对应用开发者的 “过高佣金”，这些成本最终通过更高的应用价格转嫁给消费者。</p>
<p>苹果未立即回应 Benzinga 的评论请求。</p>
<h2>全球反垄断压力上升</h2>
<p>这一裁决是在苹果在英国最近败诉的背景下作出的，苹果被指控 “通过其应用商店对应用开发者收取不公平的 30% 佣金，滥用其主导地位。” 英国竞争上诉法庭（CAT）裁定苹果败诉，这一裁决可能会重塑科技行业。</p>
<p>此外，苹果在中国面临新的反垄断诉讼，这是其关键市场之一。这可能会减缓其在该地区的进展。诉讼指控苹果在中国的 iOS 应用生态系统中垄断，通过 “强迫用户仅通过其应用内购买系统购买数字商品”，限制 iOS 应用的下载方式，并对应用内交易收取高达 30% 的佣金。</p>
<p><strong>Benzinga 的边际排名</strong> 将苹果的质量评定为第 76 百分位，价值评定为第 69 百分位，反映了其在这两个领域的强劲表现。查看详细报告。</p>
<p><strong>接下来阅读：</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>分析师称苹果即将推出的可折叠 iPhone 模型将带来重大上行空间</strong></li>
</ul>
<p><em>图片来源于 Shutterstock</em></p>

苹果

2 倍做多 AAPL ETF - GraniteShares

苹果每日 1 倍做空 ETF - Direxion

苹果每日 2 倍做多 ETF - Direxion

AAPX

AAPY

APLY

<p>一名美国联邦法官已取消对苹果公司的集体诉讼，该诉讼指控该公司在 iPhone 应用市场上垄断。法官发现原告用于证明集体伤害和损害赔偿的模型存在缺陷。此裁决是在苹果公司最近在英国关于其应用商店佣金的败诉以及在中国的新反垄断诉讼之后作出的。原告在裁决后正在考虑下一步的法律行动</p>

<p>A class action lawsuit that alleged <strong>Apple Inc.</strong>‘s (NASDAQ:AAPL) monopoly over the iPhone app market involving millions of customers has been decertified by a U.S. federal judge.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>一项指控 <strong>苹果公司</strong>（NASDAQ:AAPL）在 iPhone 应用市场垄断的集体诉讼，涉及数百万客户，已被美国联邦法官撤销认证。</p>
</div><h2>Plaintiffs’ Model Flawed, Judge Says</h2>
<div class="lb-trans"><h2>法官称原告模型存在缺陷</h2>
</div><p>U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers reversed her previous class certification ruling from February 2024. This ruling had allowed Apple account holders who had spent $10 or more on app or in-app content in the last 17 years to sue as a group, reported Reuters.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>美国地区法官 Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers 撤销了她在 2024 年 2 月的先前集体认证裁决。该裁决允许在过去 17 年中在应用或应用内内容上花费 10 美元或更多的苹果账户持有者以集体身份提起诉讼，路透社报道。</p>
</div><p>The lawsuit was filed in December 2011 and involved a class of users of iOS devices dating back to July 10, 2008.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>该诉讼于 2011 年 12 月提起，涉及自 2008 年 7 月 10 日以来的 iOS 设备用户群体。</p>
</div><p>Rogers’ decision to decertify the class came after the plaintiffs failed to present a reliable model demonstrating classwide injury and damages. This decision was made after an Apple-hired expert found significant errors in the plaintiffs’ model, including misidentification of claimants and inconsistent grouping of payment records.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Rogers 撤销集体认证的决定是因为原告未能提供可靠的模型来证明集体伤害和损失。该决定是在一位苹果聘请的专家发现原告模型中存在重大错误后作出的，包括错误识别索赔人和支付记录分组不一致。</p>
</div><p><strong>Mark Rifkin</strong>, the plaintiffs' attorney, told Reuters they were disappointed with the ruling and are now evaluating their next legal steps. The plaintiffs claimed Apple's alleged monopoly led to &#34;excessive commissions&#34; on app developers, costs that were ultimately passed on to consumers through higher app prices.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>原告律师 <strong>Mark Rifkin</strong> 告诉路透社，他们对裁决感到失望，并正在评估下一步的法律措施。原告声称，苹果的垄断行为导致了对应用开发者的 “过高佣金”，这些成本最终通过更高的应用价格转嫁给消费者。</p>
</div><p>Apple did not immediately respond to Benzinga‘s request for comment.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>苹果未立即回应 Benzinga 的评论请求。</p>
</div><h2>Rising Global Antitrust Pressure</h2>
<div class="lb-trans"><h2>全球反垄断压力上升</h2>
</div><p>This decision comes in the wake of a recent loss for Apple in the U.K., where the tech giant was accused of “abusing its dominant position by charging app developers an unfair 30% commission through its app store.” The U.K.'s Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruled against Apple, a decision that could potentially reshape the tech industry.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>这一裁决是在苹果在英国最近败诉的背景下作出的，苹果被指控 “通过其应用商店对应用开发者收取不公平的 30% 佣金，滥用其主导地位。” 英国竞争上诉法庭（CAT）裁定苹果败诉，这一裁决可能会重塑科技行业。</p>
</div><p>Additionally, Apple is facing a new antitrust suit in China, one of its key markets. This could potentially slow down its progress in the region. The lawsuit alleges that Apple holds a monopoly over its iOS app ecosystem in China by &#34;forcing users to purchase digital goods only through its in-app purchase system,&#34; limiting how iOS apps can be downloaded, and charging commissions of up to 30% on in-app transactions.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>此外，苹果在中国面临新的反垄断诉讼，这是其关键市场之一。这可能会减缓其在该地区的进展。诉讼指控苹果在中国的 iOS 应用生态系统中垄断，通过 “强迫用户仅通过其应用内购买系统购买数字商品”，限制 iOS 应用的下载方式，并对应用内交易收取高达 30% 的佣金。</p>
</div><p><strong>Benzinga's Edge Rankings</strong> place Apple in the 76th percentile for quality and the 69th percentile for value, reflecting its strong performance in both areas. Check the detailed report here.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>Benzinga 的边际排名</strong> 将苹果的质量评定为第 76 百分位，价值评定为第 69 百分位，反映了其在这两个领域的强劲表现。查看详细报告。</p>
</div><p><strong>READ NEXT:</strong></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>接下来阅读：</strong></p>
</div><ul>
<li><strong>Apple’s Upcoming Foldable iPhone Model Will Drive Major Upside: Analyst</strong></li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li><strong>分析师称苹果即将推出的可折叠 iPhone 模型将带来重大上行空间</strong></li>
</ul>
</div><p><em>Image via Shutterstock</em></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><em>图片来源于 Shutterstock</em></p>
</div>

Apple Escapes Major Payout As US Judge Overturns Longstanding App Store Lawsuit

- 美国联邦法官撤销了对苹果公司垄断 iPhone 应用市场的集体诉讼资格。  
- 法官指出原告未能提供可靠的模型证明集体损害。  
- 苹果在全球面临反垄断压力，包括英国和中国的新诉讼。

苹果逃过重大赔偿，美国法官推翻了长期存在的应用商店诉讼