<p>在当今快速变化且竞争激烈的商业环境中，投资者和行业爱好者进行全面的公司评估至关重要。本文将深入探讨一个广泛的行业比较，评估 <strong>微软 (NASDAQ:MSFT)</strong> 与其在软件行业的主要竞争对手。通过分析关键的财务指标、市场地位和增长潜力，我们的目标是为投资者提供有价值的见解，并深入了解公司在行业中的表现。</p>
<h3>微软背景</h3>
<p>微软开发和许可消费及企业软件。它以其 Windows 操作系统和 Office 办公套件而闻名。公司分为三个规模相当的广泛部门：生产力和业务流程（传统的 Microsoft Office、基于云的 Office 365、Exchange、SharePoint、Skype、LinkedIn、Dynamics）、智能云（基础设施和平台即服务产品 Azure、Windows Server 操作系统、SQL Server）以及更个人化的计算（Windows 客户端、Xbox、Bing 搜索、展示广告以及 Surface 笔记本、平板和台式机）。</p>
<p>通过对微软的详细审查，我们可以推断出以下趋势：</p>
<ul>
<li>股票的市盈率为 38.97，低于行业平均水平 0.28 倍，表明有利的增长潜力。</li>
<li>市净率为 11.5，显著低于行业平均水平 0.82 倍，表明被低估以及未开发的增长前景。</li>
<li>市销率为 14.08，为行业平均水平的 0.78 倍。这表明基于销售表现可能被低估。</li>
<li>股本回报率（ROE）为 8.19%，高于行业平均水平 1.13%，表明公司有效利用股本来产生利润。</li>
<li>息税折旧摊销前利润（EBITDA）为 444.3 亿美元，超过行业平均水平 56.96 倍，突显出更强的盈利能力和稳健的现金流生成。</li>
<li>毛利润为 524.3 亿美元，超过行业的 34.72 倍，突显出更强的盈利能力和核心业务的更高收益。</li>
<li>收入增长为 18.1%，远低于行业平均水平 64.8%，公司在销售扩张方面正经历显著放缓。</li>
</ul>
<h3>债务与股本比率</h3>
<p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1761663633_0.png/query-YXV0bz13ZWJwJmRwcj0yJm9wdGltaXplPW1lZGl1bSZ3aWR0aD0xMDgw?x-oss-process=image/auto-orient,1/interlace,1/resize,w_1440,h_1440/quality,q_95/format,jpg" alt="" original-src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1761663633_0.png/query-YXV0bz13ZWJwJmRwcj0yJm9wdGltaXplPW1lZGl1bSZ3aWR0aD0xMDgw"/></p>
<p>债务与股本比率（D/E）通过评估公司的债务相对于其股本来衡量公司的财务杠杆。</p>
<p>在行业比较中考虑债务与股本比率，可以简明地评估公司的财务健康状况和风险特征，帮助做出明智的决策。</p>
<p>在比较微软与其前四大同行的债务与股本比率时，以下信息变得明显：</p>
<ul>
<li>微软在该行业中表现出比其前四大同行更强的财务状况。</li>
<li>债务与股本比率为 0.18，表明公司对债务融资的依赖较低，保持了债务与股本之间更健康的平衡，这对投资者来说是一个积极的信号。</li>
</ul>
<h3>关键要点</h3>
<p>对于微软在软件行业中的表现，市盈率、市净率和市销率均低于同行，表明潜在的被低估。另一方面，微软的高 ROE、EBITDA 和毛利润表明其强大的盈利能力和运营效率。然而，低收入增长率可能是与行业同行相比未来表现的一个担忧。</p>
<p><em>本文由 Benzinga 的自动内容引擎生成，并由编辑审核。</em></p>

微软

2 倍做多 MSFT ETF - GraniteShares

MSFO

微软每日 1 倍做空 ETF - Direxion

微软每日 2 倍做多 ETF - Direxion

MSFX

MSFY

<p>本文对微软（NASDAQ:MSFT）与其在软件行业的竞争对手进行了评估，分析了财务指标和市场地位。主要发现包括其市盈率（38.97）和市净率（11.5）低于行业平均水平，表明可能被低估。微软展现出强劲的盈利能力，股本回报率为 8.19%，息税折旧摊销前利润（EBITDA）为 444.3 亿美元，但面临 18.1% 的收入增长放缓。该公司保持健康的财务状况，低债务股本比率为 0.18，表明对债务融资的依赖较小</p>

<p>Amidst today's fast-paced and highly competitive business environment, it is crucial for investors and industry enthusiasts to conduct comprehensive company evaluations. In this article, we will delve into an extensive industry comparison, evaluating <strong>Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT)</strong> in comparison to its major competitors within the Software industry. By analyzing critical financial metrics, market position, and growth potential, our objective is to provide valuable insights for investors and offer a deeper understanding of company's performance in the industry.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在当今快速变化且竞争激烈的商业环境中，投资者和行业爱好者进行全面的公司评估至关重要。本文将深入探讨一个广泛的行业比较，评估 <strong>微软 (NASDAQ:MSFT)</strong> 与其在软件行业的主要竞争对手。通过分析关键的财务指标、市场地位和增长潜力，我们的目标是为投资者提供有价值的见解，并深入了解公司在行业中的表现。</p>
</div><h3>Microsoft Background</h3>
<div class="lb-trans"><h3>微软背景</h3>
</div><p>Microsoft develops and licenses consumer and enterprise software. It is known for its Windows operating systems and Office productivity suite. The company is organized into three equally sized broad segments: productivity and business processes (legacy Microsoft Office, cloud-based Office 365, Exchange, SharePoint, Skype, LinkedIn, Dynamics), intelligence cloud (infrastructure- and platform-as-a-service offerings Azure, Windows Server OS, SQL Server), and more personal computing (Windows Client, Xbox, Bing search, display advertising, and Surface laptops, tablets, and desktops).</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>微软开发和许可消费及企业软件。它以其 Windows 操作系统和 Office 办公套件而闻名。公司分为三个规模相当的广泛部门：生产力和业务流程（传统的 Microsoft Office、基于云的 Office 365、Exchange、SharePoint、Skype、LinkedIn、Dynamics）、智能云（基础设施和平台即服务产品 Azure、Windows Server 操作系统、SQL Server）以及更个人化的计算（Windows 客户端、Xbox、Bing 搜索、展示广告以及 Surface 笔记本、平板和台式机）。</p>
</div><p>Through a detailed examination of Microsoft, we can deduce the following trends:</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>通过对微软的详细审查，我们可以推断出以下趋势：</p>
</div><ul>
<li>At 38.97, the stock's Price to Earnings ratio is 0.28x less than the industry average, suggesting favorable growth potential.</li>
<li>With a Price to Book ratio of 11.5, significantly falling below the industry average by 0.82x, it suggests undervaluation and the possibility of untapped growth prospects.</li>
<li>The Price to Sales ratio is 14.08, which is 0.78x the industry average. This suggests a possible undervaluation based on sales performance.</li>
<li>With a Return on Equity (ROE) of 8.19% that is 1.13% above the industry average, it appears that the company exhibits efficient use of equity to generate profits.</li>
<li>The Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $44.43 Billion is 56.96x above the industry average, highlighting stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.</li>
<li>The gross profit of $52.43 Billion is 34.72x above that of its industry, highlighting stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.</li>
<li>With a revenue growth of 18.1%, which is much lower than the industry average of 64.8%, the company is experiencing a notable slowdown in sales expansion.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>股票的市盈率为 38.97，低于行业平均水平 0.28 倍，表明有利的增长潜力。</li>
<li>市净率为 11.5，显著低于行业平均水平 0.82 倍，表明被低估以及未开发的增长前景。</li>
<li>市销率为 14.08，为行业平均水平的 0.78 倍。这表明基于销售表现可能被低估。</li>
<li>股本回报率（ROE）为 8.19%，高于行业平均水平 1.13%，表明公司有效利用股本来产生利润。</li>
<li>息税折旧摊销前利润（EBITDA）为 444.3 亿美元，超过行业平均水平 56.96 倍，突显出更强的盈利能力和稳健的现金流生成。</li>
<li>毛利润为 524.3 亿美元，超过行业的 34.72 倍，突显出更强的盈利能力和核心业务的更高收益。</li>
<li>收入增长为 18.1%，远低于行业平均水平 64.8%，公司在销售扩张方面正经历显著放缓。</li>
</ul>
</div><h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<div class="lb-trans"><h3>债务与股本比率</h3>
</div><p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1761663633_0.png/query-YXV0bz13ZWJwJmRwcj0yJm9wdGltaXplPW1lZGl1bSZ3aWR0aD0xMDgw" alt="" original-src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1761663633_0.png?optimize=medium&amp;dpr=2&amp;auto=webp&amp;width=1080"/></p>
<p>The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio measures the financial leverage of a company by evaluating its debt relative to its equity.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>债务与股本比率（D/E）通过评估公司的债务相对于其股本来衡量公司的财务杠杆。</p>
</div><p>Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在行业比较中考虑债务与股本比率，可以简明地评估公司的财务健康状况和风险特征，帮助做出明智的决策。</p>
</div><p>When examining Microsoft in comparison to its top 4 peers with respect to the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following information becomes apparent:</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在比较微软与其前四大同行的债务与股本比率时，以下信息变得明显：</p>
</div><ul>
<li>Microsoft demonstrates a stronger financial position compared to its top 4 peers in the sector.</li>
<li>With a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.18, the company relies less on debt financing and maintains a healthier balance between debt and equity, which can be viewed positively by investors.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>微软在该行业中表现出比其前四大同行更强的财务状况。</li>
<li>债务与股本比率为 0.18，表明公司对债务融资的依赖较低，保持了债务与股本之间更健康的平衡，这对投资者来说是一个积极的信号。</li>
</ul>
</div><h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
<div class="lb-trans"><h3>关键要点</h3>
</div><p>For Microsoft in the Software industry, the PE, PB, and PS ratios are all low compared to peers, indicating potential undervaluation. On the other hand, Microsoft's high ROE, EBITDA, and gross profit suggest strong profitability and operational efficiency. However, the low revenue growth rate may be a concern for future performance compared to industry peers.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>对于微软在软件行业中的表现，市盈率、市净率和市销率均低于同行，表明潜在的被低估。另一方面，微软的高 ROE、EBITDA 和毛利润表明其强大的盈利能力和运营效率。然而，低收入增长率可能是与行业同行相比未来表现的一个担忧。</p>
</div><p><em>This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.</em></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><em>本文由 Benzinga 的自动内容引擎生成，并由编辑审核。</em></p>
</div>

Evaluating Microsoft Against Peers In Software Industry

- 微软在软件行业的市盈率、账面价值比和销售比均低于同行，显示出潜在低估。  
- 公司的高股本回报率、EBITDA 和毛利润表明其盈利能力强。  
- 然而，18.1% 的收入增长率低于行业平均 64.8%，可能影响未来表现。  

评估微软在软件行业中的竞争表现