<p>在当今快速变化和竞争激烈的商业环境中，投资者和行业爱好者仔细评估公司至关重要。在本文中，我们将对 <strong>ASML Holding (NASDAQ: ASML)</strong> 与其在半导体及半导体设备行业的主要竞争对手进行全面的行业比较。通过分析重要的财务指标、市场地位和增长前景，我们旨在为投资者提供有价值的见解，并揭示公司在行业中的表现。</p>
<h3>ASML Holding 背景</h3>
<p>ASML 是制造半导体的光刻系统市场领导者。光刻是利用光源将电路图案从光掩模曝光到半导体晶圆上的过程。光刻使芯片制造商能够在相同的硅面积上增加晶体管的数量，光刻在制造尖端芯片的成本中历来占据较高比例。ASML 将大部分零部件的制造外包，充当组装商。ASML 的最大客户是台积电、三星和英特尔。</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th><strong>公司</strong></th>
<th><strong>市盈率 (P/E)</strong></th>
<th><strong>市净率 (P/B)</strong></th>
<th><strong>市销率 (P/S)</strong></th>
<th><strong>股本回报率 (ROE)</strong></th>
<th><strong>息税折旧摊销前利润 (EBITDA, 以十亿美元计)</strong></th>
<th><strong>毛利润 (以十亿美元计)</strong></th>
<th><strong>收入增长</strong></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>ASML Holding NV</td>
<td>37.84</td>
<td>18.74</td>
<td>11.12</td>
<td>11.61%</td>
<td>$2.74</td>
<td>$3.88</td>
<td>0.65%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>应用材料公司</td>
<td>29.89</td>
<td>10.05</td>
<td>7.37</td>
<td>9.5%</td>
<td>$2.45</td>
<td>$3.27</td>
<td>-3.48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>拉姆研究公司</td>
<td>36.04</td>
<td>20.12</td>
<td>10.68</td>
<td>15.64%</td>
<td>$2.0</td>
<td>$2.68</td>
<td>27.74%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>KLA 公司</td>
<td>38.43</td>
<td>32.24</td>
<td>13</td>
<td>23.17%</td>
<td>$1.48</td>
<td>$1.97</td>
<td>12.96%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>泰瑞达公司</td>
<td>69.92</td>
<td>11.08</td>
<td>10.83</td>
<td>4.3%</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>$0.45</td>
<td>4.33%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qnity 电子公司</td>
<td>30.11</td>
<td>1.80</td>
<td>3.52</td>
<td>2.6%</td>
<td>$0.38</td>
<td>$0.57</td>
<td>11.15%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Entegris 公司</td>
<td>46.29</td>
<td>3.43</td>
<td>4.15</td>
<td>1.83%</td>
<td>$0.22</td>
<td>$0.35</td>
<td>-0.07%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MKS 公司</td>
<td>37.92</td>
<td>4.04</td>
<td>2.76</td>
<td>2.87%</td>
<td>$0.23</td>
<td>$0.46</td>
<td>10.27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Amkor 科技公司</td>
<td>32.48</td>
<td>2.31</td>
<td>1.55</td>
<td>2.98%</td>
<td>$0.34</td>
<td>$0.28</td>
<td>6.74%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nova 有限公司</td>
<td>41.33</td>
<td>8.06</td>
<td>11.92</td>
<td>5.42%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>25.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Onto 创新公司</td>
<td>43.45</td>
<td>3.83</td>
<td>7.59</td>
<td>1.42%</td>
<td>$0.04</td>
<td>$0.11</td>
<td>-13.49%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Camtek 有限公司</td>
<td>110.21</td>
<td>8.81</td>
<td>11.35</td>
<td>-8.83%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>12.15%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>FormFactor 公司</td>
<td>105.62</td>
<td>4.30</td>
<td>5.74</td>
<td>1.57%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>-2.52%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Enphase 能源公司</td>
<td>21.82</td>
<td>4.19</td>
<td>2.91</td>
<td>7.11%</td>
<td>$0.1</td>
<td>$0.2</td>
<td>7.76%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Axcelis 科技公司</td>
<td>20.36</td>
<td>2.62</td>
<td>3.24</td>
<td>2.54%</td>
<td>$0.04</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>-16.74%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ACM 研究公司</td>
<td>21.59</td>
<td>1.68</td>
<td>2.83</td>
<td>2.97%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.11</td>
<td>31.96%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Photronics 公司</td>
<td>15.07</td>
<td>1.73</td>
<td>2.42</td>
<td>5.38%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>2.56%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Veeco 仪器公司</td>
<td>36.58</td>
<td>2.09</td>
<td>2.69</td>
<td>1.22%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>-10.24%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>平均</strong></td>
<td><strong>43.36</strong></td>
<td><strong>7.2</strong></td>
<td><strong>6.15</strong></td>
<td><strong>4.81%</strong></td>
<td><strong>$0.45</strong></td>
<td><strong>$0.64</strong></td>
<td><strong>6.27%</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>通过对 ASML Holding 的细致分析，我们可以观察到以下趋势：</p>
<ul>
<li>ASML 的市盈率为 37.84，低于行业平均水平 0.87 倍，显示出合理价格下的增长潜力，使其成为市场参与者的有趣选择。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>根据其市净率 18.74，超过行业平均水平 2.6 倍，可能表明其相对于账面价值的交易溢价。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>股票的市销率相对较高，为 11.12，超过行业平均水平 1.81 倍，可能表明在销售表现方面存在高估的情况。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>股本回报率（ROE）为 11.61%，高于行业平均水平 6.8%，突显出有效利用股本来产生利润。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>与行业相比，该公司的息税折旧摊销前利润（EBITDA）为 27.4 亿美元，高于行业平均水平 6.09 倍，表明盈利能力更强和现金流生成能力更强。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>与行业相比，该公司的毛利润为 38.8 亿美元，高于行业平均水平 6.06 倍，表明盈利能力更强和核心业务的收益更高。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>该公司的收入增长为 0.65%，显著低于行业平均水平 6.27%。这表明在增加销售量方面可能面临困难。</li>
</ul>
<h3>债务与股本比率</h3>
<p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1765983621_0.png?x-oss-process=image/auto-orient,1/interlace,1/resize,w_1440,h_1440/quality,q_95/format,jpg" alt="债务与股本" original-src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1765983621_0.png"/></p>
<p>债务与股本比率（D/E）是一个衡量公司相对于其净资产价值所承担债务水平的指标。</p>
<p>在行业比较中考虑债务与股本比率，可以简明地评估公司的财务健康状况和风险特征，帮助做出明智的决策。</p>
<p>在使用债务与股本比率评估 ASML Holding 与其前四大同行时，可以进行以下比较：</p>
<ul>
<li>ASML Holding 在该行业的前四大同行中表现出更强的财务状况。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>该公司的债务与股本比率为 0.14，较低，表明其对债务融资的依赖较小，维持了债务与股本之间更健康的平衡，这对投资者来说是一个积极的信号。</li>
</ul>
<h3>关键要点</h3>
<p>ASML Holding 的市盈率、市净率和市销率表明，与半导体及半导体设备行业的同行相比，其可能被低估。然而，高 ROE、EBITDA、毛利润和低收入增长表明该公司的财务表现良好，并有效利用其资源。总体而言，尽管在收入增长方面面临挑战，ASML Holding 仍显示出强劲的盈利能力和运营效率。</p>
<p><em>本文由 Benzinga 的自动内容引擎生成，并由编辑审核。</em></p>

阿斯麦

半导体 3 倍做多 - Direxion

<p>这篇文章将 ASML 控股的表现与半导体及半导体设备行业的竞争对手进行了比较，分析了市盈率（PE）、市净率（PB）、市销率（PS）、股本回报率（ROE）、息税折旧摊销前利润（EBITDA）和收入增长等财务指标。ASML 展现出强劲的盈利能力和运营效率，但在收入增长方面面临挑战。它的债务与股本比率较低，表明其财务状况更为健康。尽管面临挑战，ASML 相较于同行可能被低估，为投资者提供了潜在的增长机会</p>

<p>In today's rapidly changing and fiercely competitive business landscape, it is vital for investors and industry enthusiasts to carefully evaluate companies. In this article, we will perform a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating <strong>ASML Holding (NASDAQ: ASML)</strong> against its key competitors in the Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment industry. By analyzing important financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, we aim to provide valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在当今快速变化和竞争激烈的商业环境中，投资者和行业爱好者仔细评估公司至关重要。在本文中，我们将对 <strong>ASML Holding (NASDAQ: ASML)</strong> 与其在半导体及半导体设备行业的主要竞争对手进行全面的行业比较。通过分析重要的财务指标、市场地位和增长前景，我们旨在为投资者提供有价值的见解，并揭示公司在行业中的表现。</p>
</div><h3>ASML Holding Background</h3>
<div class="lb-trans"><h3>ASML Holding 背景</h3>
</div><p>ASML is the market leader in lithography systems for manufacturing semiconductors. Lithography is the process in which a light source is used to expose circuit patterns from a photo mask onto a semiconductor wafer. Lithography allows chipmakers to increase the number of transistors on the same area of silicon, with lithography historically representing a high portion of the cost of making cutting-edge chips. ASML outsources the manufacturing of most of its parts, acting like an assembler. ASML's largest clients are TSMC, Samsung, and Intel.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>ASML 是制造半导体的光刻系统市场领导者。光刻是利用光源将电路图案从光掩模曝光到半导体晶圆上的过程。光刻使芯片制造商能够在相同的硅面积上增加晶体管的数量，光刻在制造尖端芯片的成本中历来占据较高比例。ASML 将大部分零部件的制造外包，充当组装商。ASML 的最大客户是台积电、三星和英特尔。</p>
</div><table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th><strong>Company</strong></th>
<th><strong>P/E</strong></th>
<th><strong>P/B</strong></th>
<th><strong>P/S</strong></th>
<th><strong>ROE</strong></th>
<th><strong>EBITDA (in billions)</strong></th>
<th><strong>Gross Profit (in billions)</strong></th>
<th><strong>Revenue Growth</strong></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>ASML Holding NV</td>
<td>37.84</td>
<td>18.74</td>
<td>11.12</td>
<td>11.61%</td>
<td>$2.74</td>
<td>$3.88</td>
<td>0.65%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Applied Materials Inc</td>
<td>29.89</td>
<td>10.05</td>
<td>7.37</td>
<td>9.5%</td>
<td>$2.45</td>
<td>$3.27</td>
<td>-3.48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Lam Research Corp</td>
<td>36.04</td>
<td>20.12</td>
<td>10.68</td>
<td>15.64%</td>
<td>$2.0</td>
<td>$2.68</td>
<td>27.74%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>KLA Corp</td>
<td>38.43</td>
<td>32.24</td>
<td>13</td>
<td>23.17%</td>
<td>$1.48</td>
<td>$1.97</td>
<td>12.96%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Teradyne Inc</td>
<td>69.92</td>
<td>11.08</td>
<td>10.83</td>
<td>4.3%</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>$0.45</td>
<td>4.33%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qnity Electronics Inc</td>
<td>30.11</td>
<td>1.80</td>
<td>3.52</td>
<td>2.6%</td>
<td>$0.38</td>
<td>$0.57</td>
<td>11.15%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Entegris Inc</td>
<td>46.29</td>
<td>3.43</td>
<td>4.15</td>
<td>1.83%</td>
<td>$0.22</td>
<td>$0.35</td>
<td>-0.07%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MKS Inc</td>
<td>37.92</td>
<td>4.04</td>
<td>2.76</td>
<td>2.87%</td>
<td>$0.23</td>
<td>$0.46</td>
<td>10.27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Amkor Technology Inc</td>
<td>32.48</td>
<td>2.31</td>
<td>1.55</td>
<td>2.98%</td>
<td>$0.34</td>
<td>$0.28</td>
<td>6.74%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nova Ltd</td>
<td>41.33</td>
<td>8.06</td>
<td>11.92</td>
<td>5.42%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>25.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Onto Innovation Inc</td>
<td>43.45</td>
<td>3.83</td>
<td>7.59</td>
<td>1.42%</td>
<td>$0.04</td>
<td>$0.11</td>
<td>-13.49%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Camtek Ltd</td>
<td>110.21</td>
<td>8.81</td>
<td>11.35</td>
<td>-8.83%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>12.15%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>FormFactor Inc</td>
<td>105.62</td>
<td>4.30</td>
<td>5.74</td>
<td>1.57%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>-2.52%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Enphase Energy Inc</td>
<td>21.82</td>
<td>4.19</td>
<td>2.91</td>
<td>7.11%</td>
<td>$0.1</td>
<td>$0.2</td>
<td>7.76%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Axcelis Technologies Inc</td>
<td>20.36</td>
<td>2.62</td>
<td>3.24</td>
<td>2.54%</td>
<td>$0.04</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>-16.74%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ACM Research Inc</td>
<td>21.59</td>
<td>1.68</td>
<td>2.83</td>
<td>2.97%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.11</td>
<td>31.96%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Photronics Inc</td>
<td>15.07</td>
<td>1.73</td>
<td>2.42</td>
<td>5.38%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>2.56%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Veeco Instruments Inc</td>
<td>36.58</td>
<td>2.09</td>
<td>2.69</td>
<td>1.22%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>-10.24%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Average</strong></td>
<td><strong>43.36</strong></td>
<td><strong>7.2</strong></td>
<td><strong>6.15</strong></td>
<td><strong>4.81%</strong></td>
<td><strong>$0.45</strong></td>
<td><strong>$0.64</strong></td>
<td><strong>6.27%</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="lb-trans"><table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th><strong>公司</strong></th>
<th><strong>市盈率 (P/E)</strong></th>
<th><strong>市净率 (P/B)</strong></th>
<th><strong>市销率 (P/S)</strong></th>
<th><strong>股本回报率 (ROE)</strong></th>
<th><strong>息税折旧摊销前利润 (EBITDA, 以十亿美元计)</strong></th>
<th><strong>毛利润 (以十亿美元计)</strong></th>
<th><strong>收入增长</strong></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>ASML Holding NV</td>
<td>37.84</td>
<td>18.74</td>
<td>11.12</td>
<td>11.61%</td>
<td>$2.74</td>
<td>$3.88</td>
<td>0.65%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>应用材料公司</td>
<td>29.89</td>
<td>10.05</td>
<td>7.37</td>
<td>9.5%</td>
<td>$2.45</td>
<td>$3.27</td>
<td>-3.48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>拉姆研究公司</td>
<td>36.04</td>
<td>20.12</td>
<td>10.68</td>
<td>15.64%</td>
<td>$2.0</td>
<td>$2.68</td>
<td>27.74%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>KLA 公司</td>
<td>38.43</td>
<td>32.24</td>
<td>13</td>
<td>23.17%</td>
<td>$1.48</td>
<td>$1.97</td>
<td>12.96%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>泰瑞达公司</td>
<td>69.92</td>
<td>11.08</td>
<td>10.83</td>
<td>4.3%</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>$0.45</td>
<td>4.33%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qnity 电子公司</td>
<td>30.11</td>
<td>1.80</td>
<td>3.52</td>
<td>2.6%</td>
<td>$0.38</td>
<td>$0.57</td>
<td>11.15%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Entegris 公司</td>
<td>46.29</td>
<td>3.43</td>
<td>4.15</td>
<td>1.83%</td>
<td>$0.22</td>
<td>$0.35</td>
<td>-0.07%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MKS 公司</td>
<td>37.92</td>
<td>4.04</td>
<td>2.76</td>
<td>2.87%</td>
<td>$0.23</td>
<td>$0.46</td>
<td>10.27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Amkor 科技公司</td>
<td>32.48</td>
<td>2.31</td>
<td>1.55</td>
<td>2.98%</td>
<td>$0.34</td>
<td>$0.28</td>
<td>6.74%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nova 有限公司</td>
<td>41.33</td>
<td>8.06</td>
<td>11.92</td>
<td>5.42%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>25.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Onto 创新公司</td>
<td>43.45</td>
<td>3.83</td>
<td>7.59</td>
<td>1.42%</td>
<td>$0.04</td>
<td>$0.11</td>
<td>-13.49%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Camtek 有限公司</td>
<td>110.21</td>
<td>8.81</td>
<td>11.35</td>
<td>-8.83%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>12.15%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>FormFactor 公司</td>
<td>105.62</td>
<td>4.30</td>
<td>5.74</td>
<td>1.57%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>-2.52%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Enphase 能源公司</td>
<td>21.82</td>
<td>4.19</td>
<td>2.91</td>
<td>7.11%</td>
<td>$0.1</td>
<td>$0.2</td>
<td>7.76%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Axcelis 科技公司</td>
<td>20.36</td>
<td>2.62</td>
<td>3.24</td>
<td>2.54%</td>
<td>$0.04</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>-16.74%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ACM 研究公司</td>
<td>21.59</td>
<td>1.68</td>
<td>2.83</td>
<td>2.97%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.11</td>
<td>31.96%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Photronics 公司</td>
<td>15.07</td>
<td>1.73</td>
<td>2.42</td>
<td>5.38%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>2.56%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Veeco 仪器公司</td>
<td>36.58</td>
<td>2.09</td>
<td>2.69</td>
<td>1.22%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>-10.24%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>平均</strong></td>
<td><strong>43.36</strong></td>
<td><strong>7.2</strong></td>
<td><strong>6.15</strong></td>
<td><strong>4.81%</strong></td>
<td><strong>$0.45</strong></td>
<td><strong>$0.64</strong></td>
<td><strong>6.27%</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div><p>Through a meticulous analysis of ASML Holding, we can observe the following trends:</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>通过对 ASML Holding 的细致分析，我们可以观察到以下趋势：</p>
</div><ul>
<li>With a Price to Earnings ratio of 37.84, which is 0.87x less than the industry average, the stock shows potential for growth at a reasonable price, making it an interesting consideration for market participants.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>ASML 的市盈率为 37.84，低于行业平均水平 0.87 倍，显示出合理价格下的增长潜力，使其成为市场参与者的有趣选择。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>It could be trading at a premium in relation to its book value, as indicated by its Price to Book ratio of 18.74 which exceeds the industry average by 2.6x.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>根据其市净率 18.74，超过行业平均水平 2.6 倍，可能表明其相对于账面价值的交易溢价。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>The stock's relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 11.12, surpassing the industry average by 1.81x, may indicate an aspect of overvaluation in terms of sales performance.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>股票的市销率相对较高，为 11.12，超过行业平均水平 1.81 倍，可能表明在销售表现方面存在高估的情况。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>The Return on Equity (ROE) of 11.61% is 6.8% above the industry average, highlighting efficient use of equity to generate profits.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>股本回报率（ROE）为 11.61%，高于行业平均水平 6.8%，突显出有效利用股本来产生利润。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>Compared to its industry, the company has higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $2.74 Billion, which is 6.09x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>与行业相比，该公司的息税折旧摊销前利润（EBITDA）为 27.4 亿美元，高于行业平均水平 6.09 倍，表明盈利能力更强和现金流生成能力更强。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>Compared to its industry, the company has higher gross profit of $3.88 Billion, which indicates 6.06x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>与行业相比，该公司的毛利润为 38.8 亿美元，高于行业平均水平 6.06 倍，表明盈利能力更强和核心业务的收益更高。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>The company's revenue growth of 0.65% is significantly below the industry average of 6.27%. This suggests a potential struggle in generating increased sales volume.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>该公司的收入增长为 0.65%，显著低于行业平均水平 6.27%。这表明在增加销售量方面可能面临困难。</li>
</ul>
</div><h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<div class="lb-trans"><h3>债务与股本比率</h3>
</div><p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1765983621_0.png" alt="debt to equity" original-src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1765983621_0.png"/></p>
<p>The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is a measure that indicates the level of debt a company has taken on relative to the value of its assets net of liabilities.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>债务与股本比率（D/E）是一个衡量公司相对于其净资产价值所承担债务水平的指标。</p>
</div><p>Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在行业比较中考虑债务与股本比率，可以简明地评估公司的财务健康状况和风险特征，帮助做出明智的决策。</p>
</div><p>When assessing ASML Holding against its top 4 peers using the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following comparisons can be made:</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在使用债务与股本比率评估 ASML Holding 与其前四大同行时，可以进行以下比较：</p>
</div><ul>
<li>ASML Holding demonstrates a stronger financial position compared to its top 4 peers in the sector.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>ASML Holding 在该行业的前四大同行中表现出更强的财务状况。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>With a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.14, the company relies less on debt financing and maintains a healthier balance between debt and equity, which can be viewed positively by investors.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>该公司的债务与股本比率为 0.14，较低，表明其对债务融资的依赖较小，维持了债务与股本之间更健康的平衡，这对投资者来说是一个积极的信号。</li>
</ul>
</div><h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
<div class="lb-trans"><h3>关键要点</h3>
</div><p>The PE, PB, and PS ratios for ASML Holding indicate that it may be undervalued compared to its peers in the Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment industry. However, the high ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and low revenue growth suggest that the company is performing well financially and efficiently utilizing its resources. Overall, ASML Holding shows strong profitability and operational efficiency despite facing challenges in revenue growth compared to its industry peers.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>ASML Holding 的市盈率、市净率和市销率表明，与半导体及半导体设备行业的同行相比，其可能被低估。然而，高 ROE、EBITDA、毛利润和低收入增长表明该公司的财务表现良好，并有效利用其资源。总体而言，尽管在收入增长方面面临挑战，ASML Holding 仍显示出强劲的盈利能力和运营效率。</p>
</div><p><em>This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.</em></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><em>本文由 Benzinga 的自动内容引擎生成，并由编辑审核。</em></p>
</div>

阿斯麦控股与半导体及半导体设备行业竞争对手的性能比较