<p>伦敦，12 月 18 日（路透社）- 台湾科技公司宏碁和华硕以及中国的海信在周四获得了伦敦高等法院的裁决，解决了与诺基亚之间关于视频编码技术的全球专利争端。</p>
<p>这三家公司获得了一项声明，认为诺基亚作为一个愿意授权的许可方，会同意在法院决定专利许可的 “合理和非歧视” 条款之前，签署一份临时许可协议。</p>
<p>法官詹姆斯·梅勒表示，临时许可将要求宏碁、华硕和海信每销售一台设备向诺基亚支付 0.365 美元，超过了宏碁和华硕提议的每单位 0.03 美元，但低于诺基亚要求的 0.69 美元。</p>
<p>英国法院最近允许各方在审判期间追求短期专利许可，包括亚马逊与诺基亚的争端以及联想与爱立信的斗争，最终双方都达成了和解。</p>
<p>三星在 6 月也在与中兴的诉讼中赢得了一项临时许可，尽管该许可在上诉中被推翻。</p>
<p>关于专利许可的公平、合理和非歧视（FRAND）条款的争议在电信行业中经常导致全球法律斗争。</p>
<p>英国法院可以设定全球 FRAND 条款，依据 2020 年英国最高法院的里程碑裁决，中国的法院也可以这样做。</p>
<p>然而，梅勒在其判决中表示，诺基亚已表达出 “坚决上诉” 的意愿，包括向最高法院上诉，试图推翻该裁决。</p>
<p>宏碁、华硕、海信和诺基亚没有立即回应置评请求。</p>
<p>诺基亚今年早些时候在美国单独提起诉讼，指控宏碁和华硕的电脑以及海信的电视侵犯其与提高流媒体视频效率和质量相关的专利。</p>
<p>该公司还在欧洲对同样的公司提起了相关投诉，并与亚马逊达成了一项单独的流媒体视频专利争端的和解。</p>
<p>（萨姆·托宾报道；基尔斯滕·多诺万编辑）</p>

NOA3

诺基亚

<p>宏碁、华硕和海信在与诺基亚关于视频编码技术的专利争议中赢得了英国高等法院的裁决。法院裁定，诺基亚必须同意一项临时许可协议，费用为每个设备 0.365 美元，直到最终条款确定。此裁决是电信行业关于公平、合理和非歧视（FRAND）条款的全球法律斗争的一部分。诺基亚计划对此裁决提出上诉</p>

<p>LONDON, Dec 18 (Reuters) - Taiwanese tech companies Acer and Asus and China-based Hisense won a ruling from London's High Court on ​Thursday in their global patent dispute with Nokia over video coding ‌technology.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>伦敦，12 月 18 日（路透社）- 台湾科技公司宏碁和华硕以及中国的海信在周四获得了伦敦高等法院的裁决，解决了与诺基亚之间关于视频编码技术的全球专利争端。</p>
</div><p>The three companies obtained a declaration that a willing licensor in Nokia's position would agree ‌to an interim licence until the &#34;reasonable and non-discriminatory&#34; terms of a patent licence were decided by the court.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>这三家公司获得了一项声明，认为诺基亚作为一个愿意授权的许可方，会同意在法院决定专利许可的 “合理和非歧视” 条款之前，签署一份临时许可协议。</p>
</div><p>Judge James Mellor said the interim licence would require Acer, Asus and Hisense to pay Nokia $0.365 per device sold, more ⁠than the $0.03 per unit proposed ‌by Acer and Asus but less than the $0.69 sought by Nokia.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>法官詹姆斯·梅勒表示，临时许可将要求宏碁、华硕和海信每销售一台设备向诺基亚支付 0.365 美元，超过了宏碁和华硕提议的每单位 0.03 美元，但低于诺基亚要求的 0.69 美元。</p>
</div><p>English courts have recently permitted parties to pursue short-term ‍patent licences pending trial, including in Amazon's dispute with Nokia and Lenovo's battle with Ericsson, before both ultimately settled.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>英国法院最近允许各方在审判期间追求短期专利许可，包括亚马逊与诺基亚的争端以及联想与爱立信的斗争，最终双方都达成了和解。</p>
</div><p>Samsung in June also won an interim licence in ​its litigation with ZTE, though that was overturned on appeal.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>三星在 6 月也在与中兴的诉讼中赢得了一项临时许可，尽管该许可在上诉中被推翻。</p>
</div><p>Disputes over the ‌fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms of a patent licence have frequently led to global legal battles in the telecom industry.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>关于专利许可的公平、合理和非歧视（FRAND）条款的争议在电信行业中经常导致全球法律斗争。</p>
</div><p>English courts can set global FRAND terms, following a landmark 2020 UK Supreme Court ruling, as can courts in China.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>英国法院可以设定全球 FRAND 条款，依据 2020 年英国最高法院的里程碑裁决，中国的法院也可以这样做。</p>
</div><p>Mellor said in his judgment, however, that Nokia had expressed &#34;a firm ⁠resolve to appeal&#34; a ruling against it, ​including to the Supreme Court in an ​attempt to overturn that decision.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>然而，梅勒在其判决中表示，诺基亚已表达出 “坚决上诉” 的意愿，包括向最高法院上诉，试图推翻该裁决。</p>
</div><p>Acer, Asus, Hisense and Nokia did not immediately respond to requests for comment.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>宏碁、华硕、海信和诺基亚没有立即回应置评请求。</p>
</div><p>Nokia separately filed lawsuits ‍in the United States ⁠earlier this year, alleging Acer and Asus' computers and Hisense's televisions violate its patents relating to standards which improve the efficiency and ⁠quality of streaming video.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>诺基亚今年早些时候在美国单独提起诉讼，指控宏碁和华硕的电脑以及海信的电视侵犯其与提高流媒体视频效率和质量相关的专利。</p>
</div><p>The company also filed related complaints in Europe against the same ‌companies and settled a separate streaming-video patent dispute with Amazon.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>该公司还在欧洲对同样的公司提起了相关投诉，并与亚马逊达成了一项单独的流媒体视频专利争端的和解。</p>
</div><p>(Reporting by ‌Sam Tobin; Editing by Kirsten Donovan )</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>（萨姆·托宾报道；基尔斯滕·多诺万编辑）</p>
</div>

宏碁、华硕和海信在与诺基亚的视频流专利纠纷中赢得了英国法院的裁决